Woods said:
I don't think it's racist whatsoever using the term "well spoken". In my opinion, "well spoken" means not only to using grammer correctly, but speaking intelligently and thoughtfully.
I've used that term when referring to white, black, Asian, European, Christian, non-Christian (you get the picture) people equally.
I'm not saying that there aren't exceptions (some of which were provided above) just that last year when I tried to informally collect some sort of statistical anaylysis I found that the numbers were so heavily skewed to be considered very suspicious. I polled (I believe) three different websites that collected scouting reports on pre-draft players and measured the incidence of "well spoken" vs race in both the samples as a whole and for specific positions. Black players overwhemingly were given the tag compared to white players.
That you have a different definition of "well spoken" is fine and assuming it becomes consistent enough across scouts to be considered the norm in interpretation, that would be good. But I haven't found that to be the case, and considering the discrepencies in usuage, I think the numbers suggest that either a much greater percentage of black players entering the league are "speaking intelligently and thoughtfully" or that scouts aren't currently using it that way either.
(for those that would reply, It's what I think the word means and I'll use is that way, remember that English, unlike French, is a fluid language that is defined by it's standard usuage and not by an organized body. What most people think the word means is the best definition of what the word actually means.)
Perhaps in a few years I"ll take some time and rerun my searches on the then incomming draft class to see if things have changed.