WV Cowboy;4973614 said:
No, displaying ignorance .. is not knowing the many many instances of football players, coaches, or any athlete in general that have gone on and played in a game following a death, or severe illness to a family member or friend.
Except, in this instance, when we talk about his abysmal performance in the national championship game, we're not talking about a player playing a game in the immediate aftermath of a death or severe illness to a family member or friend. We're talking about a guy who knew the national media was about to blow his hoax situation wide open and it would have permanent consequences on his life.
WV Cowboy;4973614 said:
You say twice earlier in the thread that you don't watch the news much, .. perhaps you should before you speak to something that you obviously don't know anything about, .. which actually is the definition of ignorance.
Now now. Don't get all pissy just because I accurately called you out on your ignorance. I gladly admit I don't watch the news much, but I follow sports - especially football -
constantly. When I say "I don't watch the news" I mean things like politics, not things like SportsCenter. So that explains why I was unaware Congress repealed the concept of people in this country being innocent until proven guioty beyond a reasonable doubt.
WV Cowboy;4973614 said:
To suggest that Te'O was embarassed in the National Championship game because of the lies that he has perpetuated sounds like something that he, his agent, or Notre Dame would come up with as an excuse, .. and it is lame.
What we had in late December was a guy whose life was falling to pieces and whose hoax, perpretated on the national level, was about to be blown wide open.
Anyone who denies the idea that such a life-altering calamity would affect preparation for the biggest game of the year is demonstrating the height of ignorance and idiocy.