Marinelli and Pass Rushing

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,711
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I wonder if Marinelli will ever have a great pass rush.

He might have a decent overall defense, but I wonder if his scheme will ever produce a great pass rush even with better players.

He loves the DL stunt. The Cowboys DL appears to stunt more than half of the time. Most teams use the stunt as a surprise tactic but Marinelli uses it almost as his base strategy.

The problem with stunting is that is takes away the possibility of the DL just beating his man immediately off the snap because 1 DL is generally slamming into an OL at an angle while the other DL loops around. They often double-stunt with both DE/DT pairs doing it. This takes time. It often "works" but unfortunately it usually works about 1 second after the QB has thrown the ball.

They try not to stunt when they think it is going to be a run. We've seen a few times this season where DT Irving has beat the OL on a run play to tackle the RB in the backfield. This type of shooting the gap play is basically impossible on a stunt. If the Cowboys had Aaron Donald at DT I wonder if he would just be average because his best move (shooting the gap) would not be an option on most snaps.

It's not just the DT shooting the gap that is an issue. When the DE crashes down on a stunt it takes him out of play to just beat the OT around the outside. Often the DE is not even threatening the OT to the inside either because they have the DEs "crash" into the OG in an attempt to get the DT space to loop around or they have the DE going all the way to the Guard-Center gap.

Another issue with stunting is that it can cause problems with run defense. Several of the big runs the Cowboys have allowed came when the DL was stunting. In some games they will struggle against the run for awhile and then suddenly they'll start shutting down the run. One of the reasons that this happens is because Marinelli will quit stunting after they've been gashed by the run several times.

The great thing about Marinelli is that he teaches fundamentals like tackling and playing with leverage, etc.. Teaching fundamentals should result in young players developing over time. Compare that to a D-Coordinator like Rob Ryan who is totally focused on complex scheming and not focused on teaching fundamentals. Even if Ryan's defense is great one game or one year, it might not be the following game or year because he is not focused on teaching fundamentals and is instead dependent on himself to call a great game every week.

I'm curious about the average time that QBs held the ball back when Marinelli was coaching on the Super Bowl Tampa Bay team as compared to now. Maybe more QBs were holding the ball longer and the stunt was more effective. I'm not saying that is definite, just throwing out a possibility of why he is so attached to stunting. Once a coach has had success with something it is often difficult for them to get away from doing it.

I do think any new D-Coordinator would be happy to inherit a Marinelli defense because they have been coached on fundamentals and discipline. On the other hand a DC that inherits a Rob Ryan defense would likely want to clean house because players have likely developed a lot of bad habits.

Maybe if Marinelli had a great DE he would not stunt as much but I'm not certain that's true. Marinelli was the DL coach in Ware's last year with the Cowboys and he had Ware "crashing" down inside often. Ware did struggle with injuries that year, IIRC, so maybe that was an issue.

The Cowboys are on an unprecedented winning streak so the defense must be good enough. Maybe sacks and turnovers are not required if you also are not giving up big plays. I do know that as a fan it would be fun to see more sacks and turnovers.
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
20,235
Reaction score
16,883
I thought I read an article earlier in the season talking about how they were going to have to do a lot of stunting in order try to free people up because there were no pure pass rushers on the team. I think they were hoping Lawrence would help with that, but he really hasn't generated much pressure on his own.
 

cowboys1981

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,524
Reaction score
4,484
I think if he had a more consistent DE that could get pressure he wouldn't use stunts as much. I personally don't care for the stunts since we still don't produce as much pressure.
 

noshame

I'm not dead yet......
Messages
14,960
Reaction score
13,446
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I think the only time his DLs ever got consistent pressure was with Sapp.

Going on memory here so cut some slack lol
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,711
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I thought I read an article earlier in the season talking about how they were going to have to do a lot of stunting in order try to free people up because there were no pure pass rushers on the team. I think they were hoping Lawrence would help with that, but he really hasn't generated much pressure on his own.
One of the possibilities that I listed was that he might not do it as much with better talent; although, he still did it in 2013 when Ware was still here.
 

robbieruff

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,709
Reaction score
5,108
What is this mythical pass rush you speak of?
That's where I'm at bro!?!

"Pass Rush? What is this pass rush? I don't know a pass rush you speak of." I picture a man wearing a fedora hat in a dark smoky bar saying this to another man over a drink.
 

robbieruff

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,709
Reaction score
5,108
I wonder if Marinelli will ever have a great pass rush.

He might have a decent overall defense, but I wonder if his scheme will ever produce a great pass rush even with better players.

He loves the DL stunt. The Cowboys DL appears to stunt more than half of the time. Most teams use the stunt as a surprise tactic but Marinelli uses it almost as his base strategy.

The problem with stunting is that is takes away the possibility of the DL just beating his man immediately off the snap because 1 DL is generally slamming into an OL at an angle while the other DL loops around. They often double-stunt with both DE/DT pairs doing it. This takes time. It often "works" but unfortunately it usually works about 1 second after the QB has thrown the ball.

They try not to stunt when they think it is going to be a run. We've seen a few times this season where DT Irving has beat the OL on a run play to tackle the RB in the backfield. This type of shooting the gap play is basically impossible on a stunt. If the Cowboys had Aaron Donald at DT I wonder if he would just be average because his best move (shooting the gap) would not be an option on most snaps.

It's not just the DT shooting the gap that is an issue. When the DE crashes down on a stunt it takes him out of play to just beat the OT around the outside. Often the DE is not even threatening the OT to the inside either because they have the DEs "crash" into the OG in an attempt to get the DT space to loop around or they have the DE going all the way to the Guard-Center gap.

Another issue with stunting is that it can cause problems with run defense. Several of the big runs the Cowboys have allowed came when the DL was stunting. In some games they will struggle against the run for awhile and then suddenly they'll start shutting down the run. One of the reasons that this happens is because Marinelli will quit stunting after they've been gashed by the run several times.

The great thing about Marinelli is that he teaches fundamentals like tackling and playing with leverage, etc.. Teaching fundamentals should result in young players developing over time. Compare that to a D-Coordinator like Rob Ryan who is totally focused on complex scheming and not focused on teaching fundamentals. Even if Ryan's defense is great one game or one year, it might not be the following game or year because he is not focused on teaching fundamentals and is instead dependent on himself to call a great game every week.

I'm curious about the average time that QBs held the ball back when Marinelli was coaching on the Super Bowl Tampa Bay team as compared to now. Maybe more QBs were holding the ball longer and the stunt was more effective. I'm not saying that is definite, just throwing out a possibility of why he is so attached to stunting. Once a coach has had success with something it is often difficult for them to get away from doing it.

I do think any new D-Coordinator would be happy to inherit a Marinelli defense because they have been coached on fundamentals and discipline. On the other hand a DC that inherits a Rob Ryan defense would likely want to clean house because players have likely developed a lot of bad habits.

Maybe if Marinelli had a great DE he would not stunt as much but I'm not certain that's true. Marinelli was the DL coach in Ware's last year with the Cowboys and he had Ware "crashing" down inside often. Ware did struggle with injuries that year, IIRC, so maybe that was an issue.

The Cowboys are on an unprecedented winning streak so the defense must be good enough. Maybe sacks and turnovers are not required if you also are not giving up big plays. I do know that as a fan it would be fun to see more sacks and turnovers.
I mentioned Rod's propensity toward the stunt in another thread that talked about us using more of a nine wide technique to free up the DE's. And he won't do that particularly because of the emphasis on the stunt which creates the issues you've touched on - not to mention the danger of getting gashed in draws and quick traps that have occurred on occasion.

My view is he needs to consider more use of an extra LB like Wilson who has had some success getting home or at least disrupting the play. What we are doing now isn't working AT ALL when it comes to pressuring and TOs and we will pay for it dearly at some point.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
This is really simple.

Do you remember how there were quite a few people who thought Garrett was a suck coach. And now he looks like a freakin genius?

Offensive line, Dez, Dak, Beas, Witten and Zeke.

There are reasons why he suddenly looks like he isn't a kid who can't find his way home.

This next off-season get Marinara some real talented edge rushers and a solid across the line LB, a stud corner and safety and watch how Marinara will become the DC of the year.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,711
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
This is really simple.

Do you remember how there were quite a few people who thought Garrett was a suck coach. And now he looks like a freakin genius?

Offensive line, Dez, Dak, Beas, Witten and Zeke.

There are reasons why he suddenly looks like he isn't a kid who can't find his way home.

This next off-season get Marinara some real talented edge rushers and a solid across the line LB, a stud corner and safety and watch how Marinara will become the DC of the year.

Who is Marinara?
 

Stryker44

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
485
The mistake was treating Kiffin poorly, when he is The Master.
 

Macnalty

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,639
Reaction score
2,162
This is really simple.

Do you remember how there were quite a few people who thought Garrett was a suck coach. And now he looks like a freakin genius?

Offensive line, Dez, Dak, Beas, Witten and Zeke.

There are reasons why he suddenly looks like he isn't a kid who can't find his way home.

This next off-season get Marinara some real talented edge rushers and a solid across the line LB, a stud corner and safety and watch how Marinara will become the DC of the year.

I agree he has had the dregs these last four years to turn into silk purses. Sean Lee is his only player with a pedigree.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,711
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Did people forget he coached the DL and was a D coordinator of a Bears team that crapped all over everyone like 5 years ago?
Good question.

I did say he might have good defenses now and in the future. I just question if those defenses will have good pass rush stats.

What he was really know for in Chicago was turnovers.

Ranking for Sacks in his years as DC for the Bears:
2010 - 17th
2011 - 19th
2012 - 8th (The best year in Chicago for Peppers in terms of sacks)

Ranking for INTs in his years as DC for the Bears:
2010 - 5th
2011 - 6th
2012 - 1st
 
Top