Market for T.O. will be surprisingly hot

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Two teams are going to the Super Bowl, and 30 teams are thinking about Terrell Owens.

Well, maybe not exactly, but at least indirectly. Change is imperative in the offseason, and nobody represents change more than the forgotten-but-not-gone Owens.

Still technically property of the Philadelphia Eagles, Owens will have a new address next season. In that regard, he is like many other players. And after the Super Bowl, the Seattle Seahawks and Pittsburgh Steelers will be like all the other teams.

Win or lose, they will change their lineups. Free-agent defections dictate change, but it is more than a necessity. Change is also the desire of any team trying to get to a Super Bowl.

Stability has its rewards. The Seahawks and Steelers spent time assembling the core of their Super Bowl teams. Nobody in the NFC has been coach of his team longer than Seattle’s Mike Holmgren. Pittsburgh’s Bill Cowher is dean of all NFL coaches.

But constantly tweaking the lineup is the blueprint for improvement. Any team that stands pat stands to lose. The Eagles had been improving for years, getting to the NFC title game four years in a row. Not until they added Owens did they get to a Super Bowl. This year didn’t work out, so there will be more change.

Who will be next on Owens’ travels? Denver center Tom Nalen already has expressed his idea for improvement: “I’d take T.O. If it would work anywhere, I think it would work here because of the guys in the locker room. Guys would keep him straight. ... I think he’d conform. He’d fit in here.”

Famous first words, not without merit. As much as the Eagles suffered as Owens wore out his welcome, they benefited in 2004. Now Owens must start over in a new place, and if he has a lick of sense left — debatable, perhaps — he will be on his best behavior for at least a year. He has no chance to earn what he thinks he’s worth if he isn’t a model citizen.

Most teams won’t think twice of touching him, but every team is bound to think at least once, if to do no more than reject him out of hand. Owens represents the ultimate in change, and every team knows it must somehow change.

The Seahawks have been in the playoffs three years in a row. The Steelers have been in three AFC title games in the past five seasons. So both have been knocking on the Super Bowl door longer than most also-rans. Yet neither counted entirely on improvement from within this season.
The Seahawks plugged rookie linebackers Lofa Tatupu and LeRoy Hill into their starting lineup.

The Seahawks had eight new starters on defense.
Last year, the Steelers’ five offensive linemen never missed a game as the team went 15-1 and fell one game short of the Super Bowl. But two of the five were let go in free agency because the Steelers correctly figured on upgrading.

The Seahawks signed free-agent receiver Joe Jurevicius and he led the team with 10 touchdown catches.

The Steelers signed free-agent receiver Cedric Wilson and he helped beat Cincinnati and Denver in the playoffs with touchdown catches. Plaxico Burress led Steelers receivers in touchdown catches last season and was let go in free agency.

The Seahawks signed free-agent pass rusher Bryce Fisher, and he led the team in sacks.

The Steelers switched from power to speed in their running game, turning to undrafted second-year man Willie Parker ahead of veterans Jerome Bettis and Duce Staley.

Change can come from within, as it did in Pittsburgh with the return from injury by Pittsburgh guard Kendall Simmons and nose tackle Casey Hampton or in Seattle with linebacker D.D. Lewis.

More often, change comes from outside, via the draft, trade, or free agency.
Tight end Miller was picked 30th in the first round of the draft. Linebackers Tatupu and Hill were selected 45th and 98th. All played immediate, productive roles.

The Seahawks didn’t like losing cornerback Ken Lucas to the Panthers, but they signed free agents Andre Dyson and Kelly Herndon to make up the difference.

They were saddened when former No. 1 draft choice Koren Robinson had to spend time in alcohol rehabilitation and was released, but they haven’t missed him.

The Steelers let cornerback Chad Scott and linebacker Kendrell Bell go last offseason. Scott was a former No. 1 draft pick, Bell a former No. 2. The defense got along fine without them.

The New England Patriots won three of the past four Super Bowls and made significant changes every time.

They added running back Corey Dillon and nose tackle Keith Traylor before the 2004 season and drafted defensive tackle Vince Wilfork and tight end Ben Watson. They used Traylor for one year, and he played a big role.
Before the 2003 season, the Patriots signed free-agent safety Rodney Harrison and linebacker Rosevelt Colvin and traded for nose tackle Ted Washington. Then they released their all-pro safety Lawyer Milloy the week before the season started.

Before the 2001 season, they signed running back Antowain Smith and drafted defensive lineman Richard Seymour and offensive tackle Matt Light, both of whom started most of their rookie seasons, including the Super Bowl.
Whether the Steelers or Seahawks prevail, more change is certain. Even league MVP Shaun Alexander of Seattle could become a free agent, though not likely. In Pittsburgh, receiver-punt returner Antwaan Randle El is scheduled for free agency and the Steelers are expected to need a replacement for Bettis, who is contemplating retirement.

Will either the Seahawks or Steelers consider Owens? Ironically, both got to the Super Bowl after losing top receivers Robinson and Burress, so they demonstrate that a player of Owens’ caliber isn’t necessary. Yet conversely, both teams could find room for help at the position.

When Owens officially hits the open market, it will be interesting to see which teams are willing to even consider taking the chance. It’s liable to be a bigger market than you expect.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11024553/
 

1fisher

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
120
Doomsday101 said:
Two teams are going to the Super Bowl, and 30 teams are thinking about Terrell Owens.

Well, maybe not exactly, but at least indirectly. Change is imperative in the offseason, and nobody represents change more than the forgotten-but-not-gone Owens.

Still technically property of the Philadelphia Eagles, Owens will have a new address next season. In that regard, he is like many other players. And after the Super Bowl, the Seattle Seahawks and Pittsburgh Steelers will be like all the other teams.

Win or lose, they will change their lineups. Free-agent defections dictate change, but it is more than a necessity. Change is also the desire of any team trying to get to a Super Bowl.

Stability has its rewards. The Seahawks and Steelers spent time assembling the core of their Super Bowl teams. Nobody in the NFC has been coach of his team longer than Seattle’s Mike Holmgren. Pittsburgh’s Bill Cowher is dean of all NFL coaches.

But constantly tweaking the lineup is the blueprint for improvement. Any team that stands pat stands to lose. The Eagles had been improving for years, getting to the NFC title game four years in a row. Not until they added Owens did they get to a Super Bowl. This year didn’t work out, so there will be more change.

Who will be next on Owens’ travels? Denver center Tom Nalen already has expressed his idea for improvement: “I’d take T.O. If it would work anywhere, I think it would work here because of the guys in the locker room. Guys would keep him straight. ... I think he’d conform. He’d fit in here.”

Famous first words, not without merit. As much as the Eagles suffered as Owens wore out his welcome, they benefited in 2004. Now Owens must start over in a new place, and if he has a lick of sense left — debatable, perhaps — he will be on his best behavior for at least a year. He has no chance to earn what he thinks he’s worth if he isn’t a model citizen.

Most teams won’t think twice of touching him, but every team is bound to think at least once, if to do no more than reject him out of hand. Owens represents the ultimate in change, and every team knows it must somehow change.

The Seahawks have been in the playoffs three years in a row. The Steelers have been in three AFC title games in the past five seasons. So both have been knocking on the Super Bowl door longer than most also-rans. Yet neither counted entirely on improvement from within this season.
The Seahawks plugged rookie linebackers Lofa Tatupu and LeRoy Hill into their starting lineup.

The Seahawks had eight new starters on defense.
Last year, the Steelers’ five offensive linemen never missed a game as the team went 15-1 and fell one game short of the Super Bowl. But two of the five were let go in free agency because the Steelers correctly figured on upgrading.

The Seahawks signed free-agent receiver Joe Jurevicius and he led the team with 10 touchdown catches.

The Steelers signed free-agent receiver Cedric Wilson and he helped beat Cincinnati and Denver in the playoffs with touchdown catches. Plaxico Burress led Steelers receivers in touchdown catches last season and was let go in free agency.

The Seahawks signed free-agent pass rusher Bryce Fisher, and he led the team in sacks.

The Steelers switched from power to speed in their running game, turning to undrafted second-year man Willie Parker ahead of veterans Jerome Bettis and Duce Staley.

Change can come from within, as it did in Pittsburgh with the return from injury by Pittsburgh guard Kendall Simmons and nose tackle Casey Hampton or in Seattle with linebacker D.D. Lewis.

More often, change comes from outside, via the draft, trade, or free agency.
Tight end Miller was picked 30th in the first round of the draft. Linebackers Tatupu and Hill were selected 45th and 98th. All played immediate, productive roles.

The Seahawks didn’t like losing cornerback Ken Lucas to the Panthers, but they signed free agents Andre Dyson and Kelly Herndon to make up the difference.

They were saddened when former No. 1 draft choice Koren Robinson had to spend time in alcohol rehabilitation and was released, but they haven’t missed him.

The Steelers let cornerback Chad Scott and linebacker Kendrell Bell go last offseason. Scott was a former No. 1 draft pick, Bell a former No. 2. The defense got along fine without them.

The New England Patriots won three of the past four Super Bowls and made significant changes every time.

They added running back Corey Dillon and nose tackle Keith Traylor before the 2004 season and drafted defensive tackle Vince Wilfork and tight end Ben Watson. They used Traylor for one year, and he played a big role.
Before the 2003 season, the Patriots signed free-agent safety Rodney Harrison and linebacker Rosevelt Colvin and traded for nose tackle Ted Washington. Then they released their all-pro safety Lawyer Milloy the week before the season started.

Before the 2001 season, they signed running back Antowain Smith and drafted defensive lineman Richard Seymour and offensive tackle Matt Light, both of whom started most of their rookie seasons, including the Super Bowl.
Whether the Steelers or Seahawks prevail, more change is certain. Even league MVP Shaun Alexander of Seattle could become a free agent, though not likely. In Pittsburgh, receiver-punt returner Antwaan Randle El is scheduled for free agency and the Steelers are expected to need a replacement for Bettis, who is contemplating retirement.

Will either the Seahawks or Steelers consider Owens? Ironically, both got to the Super Bowl after losing top receivers Robinson and Burress, so they demonstrate that a player of Owens’ caliber isn’t necessary. Yet conversely, both teams could find room for help at the position.

When Owens officially hits the open market, it will be interesting to see which teams are willing to even consider taking the chance. It’s liable to be a bigger market than you expect.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11024553/

I hope Denver takes him! I personally don't want him anywhere near the Cowboys. I know a lot of you will not agree but oh, well. Just say NO to TO..:D
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
1fisher said:
I hope Denver takes him! I personally don't want him anywhere near the Cowboys. I know a lot of you will not agree but oh, well. Just say NO to TO..:D

I agree with you. It is a shame to see a guy with his talent be such as bonehead.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
Doomsday101 said:
Two teams are going to the Super Bowl, and 30 teams are thinking about Terrell Owens.

Well, maybe not exactly, but at least indirectly. Change is imperative in the offseason, and nobody represents change more than the forgotten-but-not-gone Owens.

Still technically property of the Philadelphia Eagles, Owens will have a new address next season. In that regard, he is like many other players. And after the Super Bowl, the Seattle Seahawks and Pittsburgh Steelers will be like all the other teams.

Win or lose, they will change their lineups. Free-agent defections dictate change, but it is more than a necessity. Change is also the desire of any team trying to get to a Super Bowl.

Stability has its rewards. The Seahawks and Steelers spent time assembling the core of their Super Bowl teams. Nobody in the NFC has been coach of his team longer than Seattle’s Mike Holmgren. Pittsburgh’s Bill Cowher is dean of all NFL coaches.

But constantly tweaking the lineup is the blueprint for improvement. Any team that stands pat stands to lose. The Eagles had been improving for years, getting to the NFC title game four years in a row. Not until they added Owens did they get to a Super Bowl. This year didn’t work out, so there will be more change.

Who will be next on Owens’ travels? Denver center Tom Nalen already has expressed his idea for improvement: “I’d take T.O. If it would work anywhere, I think it would work here because of the guys in the locker room. Guys would keep him straight. ... I think he’d conform. He’d fit in here.”

Famous first words, not without merit. As much as the Eagles suffered as Owens wore out his welcome, they benefited in 2004. Now Owens must start over in a new place, and if he has a lick of sense left — debatable, perhaps — he will be on his best behavior for at least a year. He has no chance to earn what he thinks he’s worth if he isn’t a model citizen.

Most teams won’t think twice of touching him, but every team is bound to think at least once, if to do no more than reject him out of hand. Owens represents the ultimate in change, and every team knows it must somehow change.

The Seahawks have been in the playoffs three years in a row. The Steelers have been in three AFC title games in the past five seasons. So both have been knocking on the Super Bowl door longer than most also-rans. Yet neither counted entirely on improvement from within this season.
The Seahawks plugged rookie linebackers Lofa Tatupu and LeRoy Hill into their starting lineup.

The Seahawks had eight new starters on defense.
Last year, the Steelers’ five offensive linemen never missed a game as the team went 15-1 and fell one game short of the Super Bowl. But two of the five were let go in free agency because the Steelers correctly figured on upgrading.

The Seahawks signed free-agent receiver Joe Jurevicius and he led the team with 10 touchdown catches.

The Steelers signed free-agent receiver Cedric Wilson and he helped beat Cincinnati and Denver in the playoffs with touchdown catches. Plaxico Burress led Steelers receivers in touchdown catches last season and was let go in free agency.

The Seahawks signed free-agent pass rusher Bryce Fisher, and he led the team in sacks.

The Steelers switched from power to speed in their running game, turning to undrafted second-year man Willie Parker ahead of veterans Jerome Bettis and Duce Staley.

Change can come from within, as it did in Pittsburgh with the return from injury by Pittsburgh guard Kendall Simmons and nose tackle Casey Hampton or in Seattle with linebacker D.D. Lewis.

More often, change comes from outside, via the draft, trade, or free agency.
Tight end Miller was picked 30th in the first round of the draft. Linebackers Tatupu and Hill were selected 45th and 98th. All played immediate, productive roles.

The Seahawks didn’t like losing cornerback Ken Lucas to the Panthers, but they signed free agents Andre Dyson and Kelly Herndon to make up the difference.

They were saddened when former No. 1 draft choice Koren Robinson had to spend time in alcohol rehabilitation and was released, but they haven’t missed him.

The Steelers let cornerback Chad Scott and linebacker Kendrell Bell go last offseason. Scott was a former No. 1 draft pick, Bell a former No. 2. The defense got along fine without them.

The New England Patriots won three of the past four Super Bowls and made significant changes every time.

They added running back Corey Dillon and nose tackle Keith Traylor before the 2004 season and drafted defensive tackle Vince Wilfork and tight end Ben Watson. They used Traylor for one year, and he played a big role.
Before the 2003 season, the Patriots signed free-agent safety Rodney Harrison and linebacker Rosevelt Colvin and traded for nose tackle Ted Washington. Then they released their all-pro safety Lawyer Milloy the week before the season started.

Before the 2001 season, they signed running back Antowain Smith and drafted defensive lineman Richard Seymour and offensive tackle Matt Light, both of whom started most of their rookie seasons, including the Super Bowl.
Whether the Steelers or Seahawks prevail, more change is certain. Even league MVP Shaun Alexander of Seattle could become a free agent, though not likely. In Pittsburgh, receiver-punt returner Antwaan Randle El is scheduled for free agency and the Steelers are expected to need a replacement for Bettis, who is contemplating retirement.

Will either the Seahawks or Steelers consider Owens? Ironically, both got to the Super Bowl after losing top receivers Robinson and Burress, so they demonstrate that a player of Owens’ caliber isn’t necessary. Yet conversely, both teams could find room for help at the position.

When Owens officially hits the open market, it will be interesting to see which teams are willing to even consider taking the chance. It’s liable to be a bigger market than you expect.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11024553/
Very few teams would touch this guy BEFORE he went to Philly, I can't believe any more would be willing to mess with him now.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
jimmy40 said:
Very few teams would touch this guy BEFORE he went to Philly, I can't believe any more would be willing to mess with him now.

I agree but you know there is always someone out there who thinks he will be the man to turn a problem player around.
 

Jarv

Loud pipes saves lives.
Messages
13,792
Reaction score
8,662
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
jimmy40 said:
Very few teams would touch this guy BEFORE he went to Philly, I can't believe any more would be willing to mess with him now.

It will be interesting to watch and see how this turns out.

I personally hopes he is kept out of Dallas.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
it's not really about trying to change him. it's about talent. the guy is one of the top wr's in the nfl and someone is gonna give him a shot and a big pay day.if you can play someone will give you the chance.every team knows he has game changing ability, and will put up with the bad for the good
 

AMERICAS_FAN

Active Member
Messages
7,198
Reaction score
0
Jerry Jones will evaluate the situation and see a receiver that plays well in Texas Stadium. He will present it as such to Parcells. And Parcells will look at it objectively as he said before "I don't know that much about the player". When BP said that I thought he was laying the foundation to say to the Dallas media, upon talking to TO "As I said before, I don't know much about the player and it's my responsibility to find out for the sake of improving this footsbll team. As far as some of the off-field troubles, I wasn't there so I can't say. All I know is that we already have a receiver here (i.e. Keyshawn Johnson) who had issues with his former organization and that situation has worked out for us pretty good".

**
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
No way BP wants to put up with TO and his crap.
Any team that picks him will regret it.
TYPIFIES CANCER.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
Doomsday101 said:
I agree but you know there is always someone out there who thinks he will be the man to turn a problem player around.
Yep, you're right about that.
 

JackMagist

The Great Communicator
Messages
5,726
Reaction score
0
Someone will give him a job; I certainly hope it is not us. Pittsburg would be a good home for him. It would get him out of the NFC and I hate the Steelers so it would be nice to see them in disarray.
 

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,560
Reaction score
4,451
AMERICAS_FAN said:
Jerry Jones will evaluate the situation and see a receiver that plays well in Texas Stadium. He will present it as such to Parcells. And Parcells will look at it objectively as he said before "I don't know that much about the player". When BP said that I thought he was laying the foundation to say to the Dallas media, upon talking to TO "As I said before, I don't know much about the player and it's my responsibility to find out for the sake of improving this footsbll team. As far as some of the off-field troubles, I wasn't there so I can't say. All I know is that we already have a receiver here (i.e. Keyshawn Johnson) who had issues with his former organization and that situation has worked out for us pretty good".

**

Apples and oranges.

Key was never the problem TO was in Philly.

Parcells had knowledge of Key and KNEW he could control him.

TO will not be a Dallas Cowboy, much of the media hype linking him to us is wishful thinking. This team is on the cusp of being back and many national media would like nothing more than for TO to put an end to that trip back to the top.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
CactusCowboy said:
Moss went to Raiders and has been on best behavior....It can happen.
I think Moss is about a 2 on the TO 1-10 jackass scale.
 

JackMagist

The Great Communicator
Messages
5,726
Reaction score
0
jimmy40 said:
I think Moss is about a 2 on the TO 1-10 jackass scale.
I think you are being kind to Moss...I'd give him a 5 on that scale. He is at least half as bad as TO but he has been injured this year and that takes some of the starch out of them.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
JackMagist said:
I think you are being kind to Moss...I'd give him a 5 on that scale. He is at least half as bad as TO but he has been injured this year and that takes some of the starch out of them.
TO personally turned a Super Bowl team into a joke. Moss hasn't gotten to that level yet. But I wouldn't argue too much against a 5 rating except that it's my damn scale.:D
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,995
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Some team will pay him, but if they are smart they will set up the contract so it is very bad for him to act out and easy for the team to get out of the contract at a drop of a dime.

You can also bet that if a team is smart they will document every little thing TO does like the eagles did.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
BrAinPaiNt said:
Some team will pay him, but if they are smart they will set up the contract so it is very bad for him to act out and easy for the team to get out of the contract at a drop of a dime.

You can also bet that if a team is smart they will document every little thing TO does like the eagles did.
The problem is it's not just about the contract and how to get out from under it WHEN TO blows up, it's what it does to the team WHEN TO blows up. You're right though, some team will pay him.
 

JIGGYFLY

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
61
jimmy40 said:
TO personally turned a Super Bowl team into a joke. Moss hasn't gotten to that level yet. But I wouldn't argue too much against a 5 rating except that it's my damn scale.:D
You leave out the fact that TO was one of the main reasons they went to the superbowl. To say TO personally turned that team into a joke is in my opinion wrong it has more to do with injuries and the fact that Philly has been so heavy handed in dealing with players contracts (westbrook, Simon, Trotter) coming home to roost, in my opinion the Westbrook negotiations took a lot out of that team and letting Simon walk did not help either, players notice these things.
 
Top