Matthew Golden should probably be our pick

I like Golden. Is he that much better than Tolbert day 1?I'm not sure yet. Which receiver in the draft is like Justin Jefferson or a Randy Moss type? Tet? I think I might rather want Luther Burden or a late rd guy like Arian Smith from Georgia if we want pure speed. We have Turpin and that's it as far as speed goes. We desperately need team speed at the skill positions. Need to get much bigger and nasty in the trenches. Athletic upside players do us little good.
 
All the Golden slander is just a way to push the agenda of wanting to go in a different direction with the first pick
 
CATCH17 said:
Problem is this draft sucks.

You’re just trying to draft good players.

Even the high upside guys are gross.

This guy and Lamb playing off each other would be fun to watch.
Click to expand...
Tight ends usually have a steep developmental curve and take time to make an impact. Those oversized receivers make an earlier impact like Bowers/Kincaid.

Warren needs some development as a route runner and as an inline blocker, and think he is a 600-700 yard player as a rookie, to me that isn’t worth the 12th pick, even in this draft. Usually you can find quality te’s after rd 1. Gronk, Kittle, Witten all weren’t 1st rd picks either
 
Cowboyny said:
Tight ends usually have a steep developmental curve and take time to make an impact. Those oversized receivers make an earlier impact like Bowers/Kincaid.

Warren needs some development as a route runner and as an inline blocker, and think he is a 600-700 yard player as a rookie, to me that isn’t worth the 12th pick, even in this draft. Usually you can find quality te’s after rd 1. Gronk, Kittle, Witten all weren’t 1st rd picks either
Click to expand...
Here's interesting nugget by Dana on RBs......this got me to thinking. If we miss on Jeanty......maybe trade down to get our 4th back and double dip the 4th and 5th round.

Brugler: If Dallas focuses on the prospect who will make the greatest impact at No. 12, then Jeanty should absolutely be on the very short list of potential Cowboys. His vision and contact balance make him a tough guy to get on the ground. What I love the most about his game is the reactionary reads — he won’t predetermine his path, he has the instincts to read, sort and cut. Want a big-play creator? Jeanty had 12 carries of 50-plus yards in 2024. No other FBS player had more than five. He is a true every-down back and does much of his best work on passing downs, catching the football or blocking in pass pro.

For me, the No. 1 reason not to take Jeanty is the volume of backs available in the subsequent rounds. Tennessee’s Dylan Sampson on Day 2 would be a great fit in Dallas. Oregon’s Jordan James early on Day 3? Yes, please. The Cowboys could wait until the fifth round and still land a quality player like Texas Tech’s Tahj Brooks or Kansas State’s DJ Giddens. The options are plentiful and likely why I would look elsewhere than running back in the first round, even if Jeanty has special all over him.
 
Hawkeye0202 said:
The only problem is we would have burned a 12th overall AND 4th rounder on WR position.........

BTW......take it for what it's worth
Click to expand...

,,, and we would STILL be getting punked on the OL and DL :mad:
I'm soooo happy that we decided to go all out and win those meaningless games with players on the field we knew we weren't keeping. Just two or three spots higher and we would have our choice of top OL/DL. :angry:
 
Hawkeye0202 said:
Here's interesting nugget by Dana on RBs......this got me to thinking. If we miss on Jeanty......maybe trade down to get our 4th back and double dip the 4th and 5th round.

Brugler: If Dallas focuses on the prospect who will make the greatest impact at No. 12, then Jeanty should absolutely be on the very short list of potential Cowboys. His vision and contact balance make him a tough guy to get on the ground. What I love the most about his game is the reactionary reads — he won’t predetermine his path, he has the instincts to read, sort and cut. Want a big-play creator? Jeanty had 12 carries of 50-plus yards in 2024. No other FBS player had more than five. He is a true every-down back and does much of his best work on passing downs, catching the football or blocking in pass pro.

For me, the No. 1 reason not to take Jeanty is the volume of backs available in the subsequent rounds. Tennessee’s Dylan Sampson on Day 2 would be a great fit in Dallas. Oregon’s Jordan James early on Day 3? Yes, please. The Cowboys could wait until the fifth round and still land a quality player like Texas Tech’s Tahj Brooks or Kansas State’s DJ Giddens. The options are plentiful and likely why I would look elsewhere than running back in the first round, even if Jeanty has special all over him.
Click to expand...
I’m hearing that the Cowboys love Miami’s Martinez and might even take him on day 2
 
Cowboyny said:
Tight ends usually have a steep developmental curve and take time to make an impact. Those oversized receivers make an earlier impact like Bowers/Kincaid.

Warren needs some development as a route runner and as an inline blocker, and think he is a 600-700 yard player as a rookie, to me that isn’t worth the 12th pick, even in this draft. Usually you can find quality te’s after rd 1. Gronk, Kittle, Witten all weren’t 1st rd picks either
Click to expand...

Again, the problem is this draft sucks and this guy is absolute quality.
 
CATCH17 said:
Again, the problem is this draft sucks and this guy is absolute quality.
Click to expand...
At 12, you have a chance to get a 1st rd graded player where there may just be 12 of them in this years draft. Overdrafting a te makes little sense, if you are going to overdraft you take a valued position
 
Cowboyny said:
At 12, you have a chance to get a 1st rd graded player where there may just be 12 of them in this years draft. Overdrafting a te makes little sense, if you are going to overdraft you take a valued position
Click to expand...
I don’t think 12 is overdrafting for Warren.


If he is there at pick 12 I think most would view it as he fell.
 
atlantacowboy said:
We just paid CD. We can't spend a first round pick on a #2 WR.
Click to expand...

Why?

This team has no weapons to speak of besides CD.

WRs are extremely expensive and if Lamb gets hurt we got nothing.

There isn’t a position that Dallas could take besides QB that this team doesn’t need. We suck and lack talent all over.
 
CATCH17 said:
Why?

This team has no weapons to speak of besides CD.

WRs are extremely expensive and if Lamb gets hurt we got nothing.

There isn’t a position that Dallas could take besides QB that this team doesn’t need. We suck and lack talent all over.
Click to expand...
The path forward here defense. Last years defense was historically bad and one of the worst in the NFL, particularly against the run. We have gaping holes at DT, LB, CB, and S............... you don't build a team through the WR position.
 
WillieBeamen said:
All the Golden slander is just a way to push the agenda of wanting to go in a different direction with the first pick
Click to expand...
The cracker munchers toss at talk. Golden is not the pot stiring crap load.

McMillan adds, "I don't like watching film either. I don't ever need to watch it by myself because we go over it as a receiver group." Of course, that may have changed over the past two years, when he posted monster numbers with the Wildcats. But the big-bodied receiver's love of the game and study habits will certainly be called into question now as a presumed first-round call awaits.

https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/st...escott-stephen-jones-free-agency/82750308007/

Just tell them to buy a new German car and play they are on the Autobahn... :popcorn:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

Total: 8,520 (members: 96, guests: 8,424)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,236
Messages
13,860,116
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top