Maybe the right move is to trade Micah

Mac_MaloneV1

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,437
Reaction score
5,729
What about this front office makes you think we can execute a trade and get anything worthwhile back?
Why do people say this?

The front office of any team has really no say in the return they get for a player. There's no negotiating - the offers are the offers.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,197
Reaction score
20,438
Imagine watching how bad this defense is at rushing the passer and saying “lets trade a top-5 pass rusher in the league”
How many games is Parsons going to win playing with 10 JAGs playing with him on defense? Because that’s what the future looks like after paying Parsons with the bloated Diggs, Martin, Dak, Steele and CeeDee contracts already on the books.
 

Daillest88

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,481
Reaction score
15,337
Hell throw in Diggs too.. he keeps playing soft u trade him and pay bland .. that’s if bland keeps playing at a high level.. 10 million saved as a post June trade. This soft/weak crap pisses me off more than anything
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,391
Reaction score
14,800
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The right move would be to offer Micah up as trade bait, actually make some calls don't just sit there and then see what comes of it. What they can't do is pay top dollar for a guy who can't always impact the game. I'd love to keep him but you can do with with a few draft picks and lower priced free agents than you can with 1 guy.
 

Hadenough

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,991
Reaction score
13,444
I’ve never been a fan of this idea and not even sure that I am right now but the Cowboys are in big big trouble with Dak and some of the other veterans they paid.

We have so many holes and a front office that does nothing to improve in free agency.

I think anyone that can be traded for valuable picks has to be considered.

We have no RB’s, WR’s are mediocre, holes on the OL coming up, front 7 on defense is atrocious, and Diggs is only good against the pass.

Also, this offense goes through Dak’s arm and that’s just not a winning recipe.

The Cowboys need to dump as many contracts as they can, get picks, and get younger and faster.

If Parsons gets you multiple firsts then you have to really consider it.

The Lions are where they are now because they made bold moves that got them a ton of draft picks.
The Cowboys can't get better until they get rid of Dak. Complete waste of money paying him.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,580
Reaction score
85,998
How many games is Parsons going to win playing with 10 JAGs playing with him on defense? Because that’s what the future looks like after paying Parsons with the bloated Diggs, Martin, Dak, Steele and CeeDee contracts already on the books.
Exactly.

They have screwed this team up bigtime.

We paid a QB that needs a ton of help and we don’t have the resources to help him.

It’s absolutely moronic how they played this.

It’s like one of these delusional homers on this site run the team.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,580
Reaction score
85,998
The Cowboys can't get better until they get rid of Dak. Complete waste of money paying him.
I think they can but they need to get very young around him.

Parsons may have to go unfortunately.

If they just keep doing what they’re doing then Dallas is just going to be mediocre for years.
 

IceStar-D7

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,286
Reaction score
8,352
I say trade anybody on this team making good money and start over-rebuild.. But you still have the idiot running the draft and trades etc. So, what would change?? In 3 years we'd be right back here. Jerry Jones...the anti-Cowboy gift that gives year-round.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,334
Reaction score
11,286
There is not a bunch i would bet on when it comes to the Cowboys..i will bet on the fact Jerry will sign #11 to a very long large deal next because thats HIS pick...and he likes Micah he isnt trying to build a winning team he is building a collection of players he picked and likes...period.
 

Teague31

Defender of the Star
Messages
18,192
Reaction score
22,779
It’s the smart move. Which is why it’ll never happen. Instead big and little will make him the highest paid defensive player in history and keep right on being mediocre
 

Syron

Well-Known Member
Messages
788
Reaction score
869
Why do people say this?

The front office of any team has really no say in the return they get for a player. There's no negotiating - the offers are the offers.
You think that's how negotiation works. Offers come in with no ability to counter or reject the offer? Really?

You literally know what the minimum for Adams is right now. Sure, no one is willing to take that deal, but the Raiders put it out there. He didn't get traded because of his contract and age.
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,351
Reaction score
33,288
I’ve never been a fan of this idea and not even sure that I am right now but the Cowboys are in big big trouble with Dak and some of the other veterans they paid.

We have so many holes and a front office that does nothing to improve in free agency.

I think anyone that can be traded for valuable picks has to be considered.

We have no RB’s, WR’s are mediocre, holes on the OL coming up, front 7 on defense is atrocious, and Diggs is only good against the pass.

Also, this offense goes through Dak’s arm and that’s just not a winning recipe.

The Cowboys need to dump as many contracts as they can, get picks, and get younger and faster.

If Parsons gets you multiple firsts then you have to really consider it.

The Lions are where they are now because they made bold moves that got them a ton of draft picks.
“Maybe”? LOL

Been saying this since last year
He is a total tool
He needs a 3-4 defense or hes not worth the money or the mouth
 

Mac_MaloneV1

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,437
Reaction score
5,729
You think that's how negotiation works. Offers come in with no ability to counter or reject the offer? Really?

You literally know what the minimum for Adams is right now. Sure, no one is willing to take that deal, but the Raiders put it out there. He didn't get traded because of his contract and age.
In the NFL, pretty much. Teams are willing to pay what they're willing to pay - they all have "grades" on players, it doesn't matter who the selling team is.

So in other words the Raiders have tried to negotiate and failed. Just like the 49ers and Aiyuk.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,580
Reaction score
85,998
Imagine watching how bad this defense is at rushing the passer and saying “lets trade a top-5 pass rusher in the league”
Oh we need Parsons. I’m thinking big picture.

Signing these vets and putting nothing but rookies and scrubs around them is not the way though.

Dallas has trapped themselves in a dead end scenario with the Dak Prescott signing and Parsons as the highest paid non-QB will do nothing but cement that.
 

WillieBeamen

BoysfanfromNY
Messages
16,134
Reaction score
47,073
How many games is Parsons going to win playing with 10 JAGs playing with him on defense? Because that’s what the future looks like after paying Parsons with the bloated Diggs, Martin, Dak, Steele and CeeDee contracts already on the books.
So why single out Micah? Hes the best player on that side of the ball.

Id rather trade Diggs than Micah
 

HungryLion

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,551
Reaction score
64,396
I’ve never been a fan of this idea and not even sure that I am right now but the Cowboys are in big big trouble with Dak and some of the other veterans they paid.

We have so many holes and a front office that does nothing to improve in free agency.

I think anyone that can be traded for valuable picks has to be considered.

We have no RB’s, WR’s are mediocre, holes on the OL coming up, front 7 on defense is atrocious, and Diggs is only good against the pass.

Also, this offense goes through Dak’s arm and that’s just not a winning recipe.

The Cowboys need to dump as many contracts as they can, get picks, and get younger and faster.

If Parsons gets you multiple firsts then you have to really consider it.

The Lions are where they are now because they made bold moves that got them a ton of draft picks.


It is what it is.

But I don’t think it’ll make a difference. Honestly. They’ll blow some of the picks. Some of the guys will come in and play well.

It won’t lead to a championship though.

The only chance this FO wins a title is if they fall *** backwards into an elite QB. I’m talking Mahomes, Brady or Manning type elite.
 

Whyjerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,314
Reaction score
26,554
I’ve never been a fan of this idea and not even sure that I am right now but the Cowboys are in big big trouble with Dak and some of the other veterans they paid.

We have so many holes and a front office that does nothing to improve in free agency.

I think anyone that can be traded for valuable picks has to be considered.

We have no RB’s, WR’s are mediocre, holes on the OL coming up, front 7 on defense is atrocious, and Diggs is only good against the pass.

Also, this offense goes through Dak’s arm and that’s just not a winning recipe.

The Cowboys need to dump as many contracts as they can, get picks, and get younger and faster.

If Parsons gets you multiple firsts then you have to really consider it.

The Lions are where they are now because they made bold moves that got them a ton of draft picks.
100 pct it is.
 
Top