This is my problem with trading Parsons.......
It’s sad and I don’t understand why teams do this.
We’ll have to draft a young player who can play at a high level for cheap.
I can't disagree, but you have to find a way to open up cap space and acquire some extra picks somehow. They're going to have to get creative in upgrading this team. It doesnt really have to be moving Parsons, but it really does feel like they need to take a step back before they can move forward.
You don't. If you trade Parsons you completely re-think your approach to defense.
The only reason I do it is because I can get at least two first rounders. If I can’t get that I’m not trading him. Trading Micah is stupid but if I can hit on two first rounders for him I’d think about it.
We wouldn’t have to do it but the front office created a mess with Prescott.
I think it’s stupid to trade him but the idea is if you get something like two first round picks for him? You’d have to think about it especially when the guy if I’m not mistaken has gone on record saying he won’t play in this league long.
I see what you are saying, but drafting defensive ends can be tricky, especially if you expect them to have an immediate impact. Look at the last 2 we drafted high ( Mazi and Taco ).
We have to make bold moves.
Me trading Micah is irrelevant from Dak. The salary cap is going up and guys like Martin, Steele and Lawrence will be off our books. My concern with Micah is for one I don’t think he’s gonna play in this league very long and I have a chance to get in front of it by getting draft picks for him.
He is legit, legit now, but I have this sinking feeling we are getting ready to see the beginning of his decline due to injuries. The way we use him and the way he plays the game with power and leverage against much larger OL, he is sure to start seeing smaller injuries rack up and soon become more serious injuries. It may not happen, but it is this underlying feeling I'm getting.
You’re asking a GM to change how he operates when there’s no incentive to do it. He has a Hall of Game jacket, he has rings, he’s worth a billion….he has no inventing to change his team got destroyed on his birthday and went on about his life.
The Cowboys would be better off spreading the wealth around on the D-Line and signing numerous players who have something left in the tank. Parsons is proving to be a player that would be better off on a team like the 9ers or Lions, who have a group of players that can get to the QB at any point during the game or can be a disrupter against an opponent's run game. The Cowboys have too much dead weight on their D-Line for Parsons to be affective anymore, he needs to be playing next to other linemen who can pull their weight against both an opponent's passing and run game, without that he's being neutralized game after game by the opponent's Offensive Coordinator.
It makes zero sense that they re-hitched that wagon. Dak is going to end up being a progress stopper to the rebuild that needs to happen.
Is Jerry going to bring in pieces to maximize him? If not it's dumb to pay him just like it was dumb to pay dak. Pieces meaning other all pro defenders with toughness/leadership because 11 sure has none of it. Which is why dlaw told him to his face what he can do and he did nothing. Dlaw knows dude is soft so wasn't tryna heat none of that. There's plenty of people dlaw wouldn't have said that to around the NFL.
Hes on a HOF trajectory. Hes 1 of only 2 players maybe 3 (Ceedee) that has a shot at the Hall, but we are going to trade him for the unknown?
I knew this was a Dak thread, but I don't understand why people keep saying this nonsense? Do you actually watch any other football? Have you seen the Chiefs, Bills and Chargers this year? The Bengals early in the season? Can someone please explain to me how these QBs have the same exact issues when they don't have talent at WR but the logic only applies to Dak?
