Memo to Garrett

[Tommy]

No we all know it is Dak winning the games, linehan has done good, and even marinelli.
But lets see what happens when they pull Dak.

It used to be that Garrett couldn't win without Romo.

Now he cant win with Dak.

 

[Jarv]

you are correct. let me rephrase that, my fault.

At the end of the season, Garrett haters or supporters should have owned up. Personal attacks aside, no one should have called you an idiot. Even if i did it, than i owe some people apologies.
The big thread of ownership and gloating should come at the end of the season.

I know what happened to me personally, even when the record backed me up. Thats a personal thing tho.

I've been anti Garrett for years, since he was the OC. If a winning trend turns around and his is leading us to the promised land, my opinion may evolve.... He is still in the "prove it" mode now to me, but I'm receptive.

If he does take us to the promise land, then I will humbly eat crow to @Idgit and his minions

 

[Idgit]

I've been anti Garrett for years, since he was the OC. If a winning trend turns around and his is leading us to the promised land, my opinion may evolve.... He is still in the "prove it" mode now to me, but I'm receptive.

If he does take us to the promise land, then I will humbly eat crow to @Idgit and his minions

Dude. I have *minions*? That's awesome.

For the record, if board opinion swings around on Jason Garrett, I won't be calling on anybody to eat crow about it. Though I will probably use it as further evidence for not overreacting in whatever the next debate becomes. That'll probably be when people turn on Dak or Elliott for something negative ESPN runs with at this point.

 

[Jarv]

Dude. I have *minions*? That's awesome.

For the record, if board opinion swings around on Jason Garrett, I won't be calling on anybody to eat crow about it. Though I will probably use it as further evidence for not overreacting in whatever the next debate becomes. That'll probably be when people turn on Dak or Elliott for something negative ESPN runs with at this point.

You won't have to call me out, if you're right and for the sake of the team going forward I really hope you are, I and some others will give you well deserved pats on the back.

 

[NEODOG]

How about this: Do what you've been doing the past 4 games (i.e. The ones that you won).

The voice of reason strikes

 

[Idgit]

You won't have to call me out, if you're right and for the sake of the team going forward I really hope you are, I and some others will give you well deserved pats on the back.

Garrett's a polarizing dude because he's definitely made his share of mistakes, and he's definitely not got the Cowboys back to where they need to be yet. It's easy to put that on him because, with a great QB in place, if the issue is not the coach and it's not the QB, then it's a lot harder to pin the issue on something specific. I just happen to think our biggest issues under the Jerry Jones haven't been all that specific recently. The problems have been subtle, but they're stubborn, and they're institutional.

 

[ShiningStar]

You won't have to call me out, if you're right and for the sake of the team going forward I really hope you are, I and some others will give you well deserved pats on the back.

yes and a lot of us on this board are stand up people. The question is, when do people admit things? Does Garrett get 20 years to prove himself? Does he get less than 1 game? Im being sarcastic with the last one, but im sure you get the impression im saying.

What is the game this season that says Dallas is legit and WE has a board can agree on something?

 

[ShiningStar]

Garrett's a polarizing dude because he's definitely made his share of mistakes, and he's definitely not got the Cowboys back to where they need to be yet. It's easy to put that on him because, with a great QB in place, if the issue is not the coach and it's not the QB, then it's a lot harder to pin the issue on something specific. I just happen to think our biggest issues under the Jerry Jones haven't been all that specific recently. The problems have been subtle, but they're stubborn, and they're institutional.

thats when you have to bring out the flame throwers and aim at the FO.

 

[AbeBeta]

Garrett's response: Thank you. 4-1 with our #1 QB out, #1 WR missing time, Best CB missing time, LT missing time and or best pass rusher missing time. Shut up!

If he had followed this advice we would easily be 8-0 right now.

 

[DandyDon52]

I'm thinking you might be serious. But no, that can't possibly be.
You don't think the league's top running game is helping just a little?
"Dak" (and Dak alone from your comment) is winning the games?
really?

And the defense shut out Cincy for a good bit of last game as well.

It is all revolving around dak, take him out and see how it goes.

 

[DandyDon52]

Dandy has made some really dumb comments on here, so I'm thinking he's serious

I was serious, and dumb comments, are dumb only to some.
I said before seattle game Dak should be the starter , and I was one of the very few who thought dak was ready to be a starter.
Many thought that was dumb, but now not so much?

 

[DandyDon52]

It used to be that Garrett couldn't win without Romo.

Now he cant win with Dak.

Well no he is winning with Dak, and he may be contributing to that I dont know.
The key is will he make a stand to stay with dak, or go along with inserting Romo ??

Dak prepares himself for the games, and is the main reason they are winning these games.