It's not about being "drunk" - it's about HOW drunk you are to the point you can't consent. The "I was drunk!" does not work here, you must prove you lost your cognitive abilities.
This is the exact reason the "I was drunk" often doesn't work in such cases as this or really any case. Also what makes this difficult is the amount of alcohol that gets people THAT drunk differs between person to person.
She better be capable of showing she was incapable of giving consent or this is a big waste of time.
No. That'd be stupid because if she was drunk, she cannot consent. Welcome to the 21st century.
I hope the Network stands behind him, doesn't fire him, and speaks on his character as to the reason why they will wait until proven guilty.
It would be a lot smarter than hoping there's no physical evidence (if he slept with her) and then having to change his story.
did you read the account? Sounds like she passed out and believes he had sex with her.
true but there is no way there wouldn't be some of his DNA on/in her
lol. Only in her dreams?!?did you read the account? Sounds like she passed out and believes he had sex with her.
That's not enough to prove anything. That's a simple accusation. Innocent until proven guilty.
So unless multiple women come forward that have no connection to her and have similar stories, this isn't going anywhere.
You would know..Yes. Always assume a woman is lying.
Boy oh boy, some character defects on display here
Yes. Always assume a woman is lying.
Boy oh boy, some character defects on display here
Women deserve the same presumption of innocence. Irvin has a history of bad behavior.
Irvin deserves the same presumption of innocence and not judged in this case off of his past. Women have a history of bad behavior.Women deserve the same presumption of innocence. Irvin has a history of bad behavior.
That's actually the dumbest claim he could make if he raped her. Of course there would be physical evidence if he slept with her. It would be much smarter to say they had consensual sex from the beginning. Not say that they didn't, and then say oh it was consensual if the lab finds evidence.
This is pretty easy
- Did she get a rape kit done? Yes or no? If no, we move on to the next question
- Any witnesses? Yes or no? If not, we move on to the next question
- Any other women recently coming froward with similar stories?
If no to both, I don't care. I'm not a fan of the court of public opinion, I'm not part of a lynch mob. Let the investigators do their job, if they come up with nothing, move on. If they do, goodbye Irvin and you were always a low IQ hypocrite who were propped up as some kinda God due to 90s nostalgia. Wouldn't say I'm entirely surprised he went down a bad path again.