Michael Irvin explains how INTs vs Packers were not Dak's fault

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Don't care about any of that. One critical difference. The routes were working across the field. The QB could clearly see what was happening (ie, the congestion) on the first interception. There was every reason not to throw the ball.

2nd one - pass needed to be released while the receiver was going up field and trust he would break across the safety. Two completely different scenarios.

Again, he's throwing the ball before Lamb breaks. Hey but what does Irvin know about coverages and route running...lol
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Fine. I'll give Dak a pass on both INTs. He's paid 40 mil per and he had two chances to take the team on his back and take us down the field with the game on the line, on the last possession of regulation and after the coin toss. He failed.

You mean the penalties after big plays?
 

TheSport78

The Excellence of Execution
Messages
10,472
Reaction score
3,766
Fine. I'll give Dak a pass on both INTs. He's paid 40 mil per and he had two chances to take the team on his back and take us down the field with the game on the line, on the last possession of regulation and after the coin toss. He failed.
Like he usually does. See the Niners playoff game from last year. Dude is a fraud.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,910
Reaction score
51,483
You can try to rationalize and justify all you want BUT guess who is stuck with the INT and who it goes against.
And? Are you happy? Seriously. Are you ecstatic that INTs, including those cause because of the receiver, goes against a QB? What exactly are you trying to say here?
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,910
Reaction score
51,483
Same clowns who complain about Dak holding on to the ball and not anticipate are now complaining he should have held on to the ball until he saw the receiver become fully open. :facepalm:

You can't make this stuff up.
Hypocrites. Then again, they don't care. They are simply here to incessantly hate on Dak.
 

Bigrandrn

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,334
Reaction score
1,339
You can try to rationalize and justify all you want BUT guess who is stuck with the INT and who it goes against.
I have my reservations about Dak, but if it’s a timing route and the ball is supposed to be thrown early, before a break, it totally matters if the receiver runs a crappy route, they are more to blame than the QB. That’s why Aikman and Irvin put all them reps in…timing.
 

lukemartin79

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,079
Reaction score
1,189
Those picks were killers, especially the strip/sack fumble recovery that gave us the ball on the 10 right after getting the TD. I was impressed that Dak put it behind him and made some great plays after those and had us up 14 in the 4th quarter even with the 2 picks. What happened to the GREAT DEFENSE today?
 

Cmac

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,214
Reaction score
9,417
I really dont care who is to blame to be honest. Its the same BS every year. Big games the Cowboys as an entire team fold.
The jokes will come.....and we should be used to it by now. No need to get mad at Stephen A or Shannon........and no need to listen to Skip come up with excuses.
 
Top