Michigan vs. that small team from that small city in Ohio GAME THREAD

Whether you like or hate either team...that was one of the BIG games that actually lived up to the hype.

Great game to watch.
 
burmafrd;1169418 said:
Illinois, Northwestern, Minnesota, Iowa are huge games? Really?


You wouldnt know anything about conference play, would you?
 
JustSayNotoTO;1169417 said:
Im so happy that ******* has no more eligibility left. Who is behind him?

Maybe LLLLLoyd will get lucky next year.

You have a better chance if Tressel would move on.:cool:

Guy is a great coach IMO.
 
I bet Navy this year would beat everyone in the big ten except OSU, Mich, Wisconsin and probably Penn State. Purdue would be interesting. So one of your so called cupcakes would be better then half the big ten. Of course the big ten was down this year after the top two. But that sort of destroys your case as well, doesnt it?
 
Just to clear up things a little- Iam a a Hawkeye Alum and I have lived and died Iowa football almost as much as ND. This year has really SUCKED for Iowa. So yes I follow the big ten,. Anything else dumb you want to say?
 
burmafrd;1169423 said:
I bet Navy this year would beat everyone in the big ten except OSU, Mich, Wisconsin and probably Penn State. Purdue would be interesting. So one of your so called cupcakes would be better then half the big ten. Of course the big ten was down this year after the top two. But that sort of destroys your case as well, doesnt it?

So you think, Golden homer.

So you think.

Navy sucks, get over it.


The Big 10 was down? Going into today they had 3 in the top 10.
 
Navy this year would have beaten Iowa and Minnesota and Illinois and probably Northwestern and Indiana.
 
burmafrd;1169429 said:
Navy this year would have beaten Iowa and Minnesota and Illinois and probably Northwestern and Indiana.

Whatever makes you sleep better at night.
 
Wisconsin does not belong in the top 10- just like Rutgers.
And your ignorance is showing more and more.
 
burmafrd;1169431 said:
Wisconsin does not belong in the top 10- just like Rutgers.
And your ignorance is showing more and more.


They dont belong, but yet voters and computers think they do.

Quit talking down to me.
 
But yet ND are totally top 10 worthy, right?

That one win against Gtech was amazing, wasnt it?
 
By the way I have seen several Iowa games, 2 Illinois games, and 2 Northwestern games. ALso Minnesota and Purdue and Penn State and Indiana. Have you watched Navy? If you haven't, then you have nothing to say about them.
 
Purdue was 8-4; So was Penn State. Navy is 8-3. Georgia Tech could win their conference. We play USC still. We have just as many quality wins as any team in the top 10 and more then Wisconsin or Rutgers.
 
burmafrd;1169444 said:
Purdue was 8-4; So was Penn State. Navy is 8-3. Georgia Tech could win their conference. We play USC still. We have just as many quality wins as any team in the top 10 and more then Wisconsin or Rutgers.

:lmao2:
 
Interesting that the only real quality win Michigan has is ND. Wisconsin is kind of questionable.
 
burmafrd;1169451 said:
Interesting that the only real quality win Michigan has is ND. Wisconsin is kind of questionable.


Questionable win against a team in the top 10.

How many of those had the Domers had?
 
Just what quality wins did Michigan have. Wisconsin beat no one. And you claim that ND is nothing. So what did Michigan do to rate being #2?
 
Notre Dame beat Georgia Tech AT Georgia Tech. And that team looks like it will win their BCS conference championship. That means that Michigan has not beaten any BCS conference champs. Wisconsin beat no one to earn any rep; so what did michigan do?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,215
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top