Micks Mail - 2

BigDFan5 said:
nors I didn't kow u had 2 accounts
Nah. Not even Nors would pretend to be someone famous on another forum. Or is STSINAZ the guy who bought that the other guy was famous?

I lost track.
 
Rack said:
No he didn't. If he had "Sucked" he wouldn't of been starting. Period.





No he isn't. Dat had been injured in the previous years when playing in a 4-3 too.

His injury had nothing to do with what front he played in. Period.





So you're saying Nors is wrong about Shanle? Nors is all over SHanle's jock. You start a thread kissing Nors' butt but then point out one of the things he's wrong about (in your opinion). Strange.





The defense is playing well cuz we have better players. Not cuz the 3-4 is some magical defense.





So now you're claiming Nors is right about something that hasn't occured. Can you look into that crystal ball and tell me tonight's lotto numbers?





You're freakin' delusional. Ask Nors what the difference between a Draw and Delay are and see what "truth" he gives you.
Post of the day.
 
Hey Juke and I have already beaten the confession out of the culprit.

You guys are going to cause a hung jury.
 
By the way, bye weeks suck.

You need diversions like this thread to keep from going batty.
 
Hostile said:
By the way, bye weeks suck.

You need diversions like this thread to keep from going batty.


To keep from going batty? :lmao2:

If this thread isn't proof bye week is harmful to your mental health, I don't know what could be.
 
LaTunaNostra said:
To keep from going batty? :lmao2:

If this thread isn't proof bye week is harmful to your mental health, I don't know what could be.
Believing that Nors actually knows what he's spouting about is harmful to mental health too.
 
I know you live in a desert

Can't believe I'm losing the vote even after Miki admitted to doing it!
 
Nors said:
I know you live in a desert

Can't believe I'm losing the vote even after Miki admitted to doing it!
The price you pay for becoming a troll.
 
STSINAZ said:
Al Singleton did suck bottom line...we are better without him

Dat was and is too small for the 3-4...we are better with him only on nickel

Shanle is ok but we can do better with someone else who plays better inside next year...whether its burnett or someone else we will see

the 3-4 has come as he and i predicted....it is working...the players are bigger...we play bigger...and they are shutting down people

Romo is better than Henson...he has turned the corner and will start one day...whether it is here or not is up to Bledsoe...now a few years ago i never would have thought that but it's here..he is better and key and parcells have said so...

Now I am not a Nors backer I have said most of this stuff for a LONG TIME...i am a fellow believer in the truth...you guys should listen to him when he speaks it...you should listen to anyone who is speaking it....dont fight it...change has been happening and will continue to happen...THE PARCELLS WAY


People fight anything I talk about - even when they are defensing losing issues. Thats what amuses me the most. I'm not teflon, put it out there and all things Parcells - I've been in Ct during his Giant run, was in Boston for his Pat run and LOVING the Dallas era.

We are bigger, we are better. Those with crosshairs on their backs are few now. What a 2 year transformation of talent.

Kudo's on turning this entire organization around. I hope to be playing in January and February.
 
Hostile said:
The price you pay for becoming a troll.


Such an easy put down......
Must suck being wrong SO OFTEN ON ALL THINGS PARCELLS AND CHANGE!

"Bledsoe to back up Henson"
CLASSIC hos!

Better yet the epic Howard is coming/trade and we can't move to a 3-4. Parcells is now 90% THERE! And its good.

I'm laughing my hybrid *** off!

Save yourself the Ty Law reply, we should have traded Rogers for Him! And all those that said he'd never play this year - hello - 4 interceptions in 8 games.....
 
Nors said:
Such an easy put down......
Must suck being wrong SO OFTEN ON ALL THINGS PARCELLS AND CHANGE!

"Bledsoe to back up Henson"
CLASSIC hos!

Better yet the epic Howard is coming/trade and we can't move to a 3-4. Parcells is now 90% THERE! And its good.

I'm laughing my hybrid *** off!

Save yourself the Ty Law reply, we should have traded Rogers for Him! And all those that said he'd never play this year - hello - 4 interceptions in 8 games.....
How many posts about switching to the 3-4 in 2003, and it didn't happen.

How many posts about switching to the 3-4 in 2004 and it didn't happen.

Then in the 2005 off season when EVERYONE acknowledges we're going to make a move in that direction you think you've unearthed a diamond. It's so pathetic it's laughable.

We have to be talking thousands of posts Nors.

Trust me, it's not impressive.

How many posts the last 2 years about the benching of Al Singleton?

How many about his waiver?

Hundreds? At least that.

You look foolish my man. Real foolish.

You don't want me to bring up Ty Law. That's funny because I'd never tell you not to bring up the backup QB issue. You know why? I've got nothing stupid to hide in regards to it. Not one blessed thing Nors. You've got dozens of stupid things to hide from. Ty Law is just the one where you really come off looking foolish because you claimed inside sources.

Then you sit there like Jabba the Hut and try and rag me about 1 or 2 posts that are months old? The funniest thing is you think it actually hurts my feelings. I've said it over and over Nors. No one gives a crap about what I predicted. Except maybe Charles and he's got that as an agenda. Big freaking whoop.

Let's go back to Draw versus Delay for one minute. What was your "reason" for not answering the question? Oh yeah, it was "off topic." Dude you go off topic to thump your skinny chest more than the entire rest of the forum combined. The problem wasn't it was off the topic of the thread. The problem was it was about football and you were lost. For proof you need to look no further than the "70's trivia" angle you feebly tried to throw out there to save face.

You object to being a troll? It's real simple, stop trolling. The only reason you haven't been banned from this site is you're amusing. That's right, you're nothing but a punchline. Deal with it.
 
None in 2003 - That was the QC playoff team

I started calling for it as we went into 2004

And you fought the 3-4 right up to the draft. Get off the damn fence. That son of a ***** piece of wood deserves a better lot in life. Started whistling a new tune after it all collapsed on you.
 
Nors said:
None in 2003 - That was the QC playoff team

I started calling for it as we went into 2004

And you fought the 3-4 right up to the draft. Get off the damn fence. That son of a ***** piece of wood deserves a better lot in life. Started whistling a new tune after it all collapsed on you.
Take a guess what it means when people post this in response to your threads.

"The sun will rise in the East tomorrow."

Go ahead and guess. It's fun.
 
STSINAZ said:
Al Singleton did suck bottom line...we are better without him

Dat was and is too small for the 3-4...we are better with him only on nickel

Shanle is ok but we can do better with someone else who plays better inside next year...whether its burnett or someone else we will see

the 3-4 has come as he and i predicted....it is working...the players are bigger...we play bigger...and they are shutting down people

Romo is better than Henson...he has turned the corner and will start one day...whether it is here or not is up to Bledsoe...now a few years ago i never would have thought that but it's here..he is better and key and parcells have said so...

Now I am not a Nors backer I have said most of this stuff for a LONG TIME...i am a fellow believer in the truth...you guys should listen to him when he speaks it...you should listen to anyone who is speaking it....dont fight it...change has been happening and will continue to happen...THE PARCELLS WAY
thanks I'll try to remember that:rolleyes:
 
Also 2004 I called for 3-4 some. Thornton played the role of Ware and it was in the playbook and it was used some.

Thanks for making yet another point for me!
 
Nors said:
Also 2004 I called for 3-4 some. Thornton played the role of Ware and it was in the playbook and it was used some.

Thanks for making yet another point for me!
In your mind only. Therefore it's real lonely.
 
Hos - call GEICO at least you might save some $ on sandstorm insurance!
 
Geez who cares who was 'right', 'wrong' or indifferent about if we went 3-4, when we went 3-4, how much of it would be played, who would do well in it, or who would not?

The only freaking thing that matters is Bill and his Def-CS have got the D both more versatile and more dangerous pretty darn fast.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,178
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top