You don't have to wait until June 1st to qualify a player as a Jun1 cut. You can qualify them as a Jun 1 cut beforehand and release the player while absorbing an acceleration of bonuses as if they were cut after Jun1. I don't know the dates for this but I think you could do it right now.
Well, the article is not dead on. Saying we blitzed Roy all the time to keep him out of level three is totally incorrect. We seldom blitzed RW last year. I will say I don't think Roy is blitzing as effectively as he used to. But I'm one who thinks his level of play has dropped off significantly all around.
But where I think some people are getting upset is the Roy sucks stuff, we need to cut him, he can't cover, teams are going after him all the time.
When you start using always and never you are setting yourself up as it is rarely true.
In fact RW is playing because no one on the team can beat him out. And they have gotten enough playing time to push him. No one does in all around play. I'm not entirely certain what that means beyond he plays better than Keith Davis and Watkins. But it does say that. So when people say we could have kept Keith Davis and cut RW, you are losing credibility.
The problem with RW is he has not gotten significantly better. He has gotten significantly worse. That's a problem. And he is doing things to aggravate fans and other players. Sure Ellis says some dumb things. But there was truth in what he said. His teammates are wondering what is going on with him. Why. Because they see the problem and it APPEARS they don't know if he is doing all he should do; in the least they wonder if he is distancing himself. Do I actually know that. Not for certain. But it APPEARS there is some llevel of truth in what he said.
And players who are on top of their game don't change their jersey number. That says reams. Sure you can write it off. But I think you're burying your head in the sand if you do.
So Roy does not suck, there isn't anyone here to take his place, and he needs to improve. There is not a lot to argue about with that statement. If you're fair.