Mike McCarthy is making new playbook Dak inclusive and friendly

With Dak being given a big say about the new playbook, is that a good or bad idea?

  • Good

    Votes: 91 79.8%
  • Bad

    Votes: 23 20.2%

  • Total voters
    114

Cboyfan4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,936
Reaction score
2,444
Teams win, not one person. Yes the running backs contribute to team's success too. Elementary?? Name me one Elementary school football coach who can qualify to coach in the NFL.

You're already upset at the fact that we could win without Dak having to throw 50 times a game. If Dak passed for 280 yards, 2 tds and zero ints and we won.... you would be upset.

You would be upset that we won with Dak under center and it would nullify your ability to cry and moan like a ***** after a loss and/or blame Dak for a loss whether it's his fault or not.

This is the reason you type less after we win games with Dak under center. You are one of the few weak ones here who have NEVER given Dak credit after wins, or when he has played well, yet you type on the board daily after losses and blamed EVERY loss on Dak, even if it's the kicker or defense fault we loss. Go sit your Washington Commander smellin *** down somewhere lil guy.
Yes, for the most part, teams do win games, but 1 person can certainly lose games for a team.
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,230
Reaction score
3,584
Yes, for the most part, teams do win games, but 1 person can certainly lose games for a team.

Yes, you're right. But the quarterback is not the only person who can lose a game. Any ball handler can fumble, any defensive player can put the opponent in scoring range with a bad penalty, any offensive lineman can give up a sack at the wrong time or nullify a big play with a penalty.
 

SpaceCowboy99

Well-Known Member
Messages
557
Reaction score
672
Oh so hea making it a playbook with 3 plays? That's what Dak needs so we don't have to see the deer in the headlights look every game all season long. This clown has no ability to adjust. He's also not accurate enough to be a threat. That's why most serious secondaries can play man and rush him. He doesn't know what to do.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
10,021
Over thinking here.. maybe its as easy as "We dont want to run 90% pass plays where all 4 Recievers must read the defense correctly on their option routes and the QB needs to go through 4 progressions to find the open one.." "Hey we are schememing for aption a to be open if not look at option B if thats covered dump it to C, Run or make it a fan ball."
 
Top