Is there something wrong with that?The front office should be looking for help at RB. Not that I felt good about Sanders, but we are 1 wrong fall away from having a Blue, Davis, Luepke backfield
then why diont teams bench their star RB every game in the 2nd half to bring in "Fresh legs?" I mean tey are aways better?Fresh legs is always better
I bet you were one of the many that was saying our backfield was utter trash before the season started also.The front office should be looking for help at RB. Not that I felt good about Sanders, but we are 1 wrong fall away from having a Blue, Davis, Luepke backfield
so we should Mafah and Blue some of Williams touches?You could be spot on about Mafah's abilities, and fit for this scheme. I just want to know who's who, no going into next year with questions about these RBs, play them all.
Losses to the Eagles and Bears. Possibly the tie to the Packers as well which could have been a win with better RB group.What cost them?
wait.... the offense put up 37 points in regulation, and you think we could have won had we had better RUNNING BACKS? You mean like Saquon? lolLosses to the Eagles and Bears. Possibly the tie to the Packers as well which could have been a win with better RB group.
well damn, I bet the Lions would give us Gibbs if we waved Tolbert in front of them. And people complain about our FO....smhMaybe look at a swap for a WR hangry team that has a back available?
Make Tolbert available with Mingo coming back.
In key moments where being able to punch the ball in on the ground inside the Red Zone against the Packers, instead of settling for a tie, would have definitely helped with a better RB group. Same goes for loss against the Eagles and possibly the Bears as well.wait.... the offense put up 37 points in regulation, and you think we could have won had we had better RUNNING BACKS? You mean like Saquon? lol
yes, I would rather have mafah than blue, he is a power runner, which fits our offense better.When is Mafah due back?
Well damn, if thats the case, hving the 90s offensive line would be much better than our current group. Having Roger Staubach would be a huge improvement at QB, or maybe having a defense that could make a stop would have helped also.In key moments where being able to punch the ball in on the ground inside the Red Zone against the Packers, instead of settling for a tie, would have definitely helped with a better RB group. Same goes for loss against the Eagles and possibly the Bears as well.
We have one of the best running games in the league so far.Losses to the Eagles and Bears. Possibly the tie to the Packers as well which could have been a win with better RB group.
You must be referring to his first carry, that awesome 6-yard run because the next three carries yielded a combined 1 yard.Then you must’ve been too busy posting in the game chat. He showed some burst, held up his end in pass blocking and understood what he was supposed to be doing.
Needs knee surgery.what happen, hang nail and Dr Jerry diagnosed him
Our starting and backup Oline is doing great! Problem has been the choice of gameday active RBs. That is where Schotty has messed up, and it has cost us, especially with our Defense not helping much at all these first 5 games. We have the horses, but Schotty decided to keep the bigger talents in the stable. Costly mistake.Well damn, if thats the case, hving the 90s offensive line would be much better than our current group. Having Roger Staubach would be a huge improvement at QB, or maybe having a defense that could make a stop would have helped also.
See my previous response above...^^^We have one of the best running games in the league so far.
