Temo
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,946
- Reaction score
- 362
masomenos85;2783789 said:Scip always makes sense, that's his thing.
Meh, I've disagreed with his logic a few times; I don't post it often though
masomenos85;2783789 said:Scip always makes sense, that's his thing.
Temo;2783787 said:Well, it's not even that, but he was just stating that our scientific classification is as a "great ape", the taxonomic family. I thought it was weird to take a taxonomic classification so personally, but I suppose Scipio's explanation makes some sense in that regard. (Latinized "Hominidae")
If you want to see how ironclad the case for the evolution of man is, make a list of all the fossils discovered so far that "prove" the evolution of man from lower life forms, date them, and then ask yourself if abductive reasoning is not what urges it, and if it really precludes the possibility of quite a different in place of the theory of evolution.
SultanOfSix;2783797 said:LOL. I didn't take it so personally, and I know evolutionary classifications. I believe a lot of it is simply fill in the gaps in the name of "science".
As Nuh Ha Mim Keller once wrote:
For God's sake, look at the freaking picture on the article. It shows five different "transitioning" skeletons from chimp to man over a period of millions of years - millions of years!