Cajuncowboy;2824774 said:Elvis, and it's not even close.
CATCH17;2824778 said:I think its close and maybe even a coin flip.
An Apple vs Orange type argument.
CATCH17;2824778 said:I think its close and maybe even a coin flip.
An Apple vs Orange type argument.
Cajuncowboy;2824788 said:Elvis was more of an icon simply because he broke ground in an era that was resistant to his new type of music. Jackson came along during a time when music was looking for something new.
Not trying to take anything away from Jackson, but I think without Elvis, Michael Jackson may not have come along, IMO.
YoMick;2824814 said:I guess it fun to declare one an all timer.
Fact is: Elvis was best in his time. Michael was best in his time.
No need to declare one the greatest ever.
I think it's the total opposite.Cajuncowboy;2824774 said:Elvis, and it's not even close.
Yeagermeister;2824837 said:There is a simple answer for this. In 20 yrs will people flock to LA or Gary, Ind twice a year to celebrate Michael's birth and death......no.
Elvis is and always will be a bigger icon.
/thread
Hostile;2824857 said:Elvis never married a Jackson as a publicity stunt to revive his fading legacy.