BigStar
Stop chasing
- Messages
- 11,528
- Reaction score
- 17,081
I wonder if they are trying to convince teams there's no reason to trade in front of them for Wentz.
This, specifically to us and SF.
I wonder if they are trying to convince teams there's no reason to trade in front of them for Wentz.
I wonder if they are trying to convince teams there's no reason to trade in front of them for Wentz.
Pretty please.
And then hope the Chargers don't trade the pick.
I worry about Goff because I don't think he is a guy that will make a lot of plays outside of the scheme.
If we are committed to Garrett then we need a guy at QB that can create and imo Goff doesn't excel there.
Whatever the name is...if it is Cleveland they will probably be the wrong name for that team.
Their last few years of first round picks, even when they have multiple first round picks, have been astoundingly bad.
Danny Shelton
Cameron Irving
Justin Gilbert
Johnny Manziel
Barkevious Mingo
Trent Richardson
Brandon Weeden
Phillip Taylor
Joe Haden ---last really good first round pick imo.
Now let's look at their QBs
Johnny Manziel
Brandon Weeden
Colt McCoy (to be fair a third rounder)
Brady Quinn
Charlie Frye (to be fair a third rounder)
Luke McKown (to be fair a fourth roundeer)
I think this an entirely different group drafting this year.
Pretty please.
And then hope the Chargers don't trade the pick.
There have been through a great number of people over the years...and they still have sucked at drafting.
Haden, Thomas and Mack have been the lone first rounders that have been good since coming back into the league in 1999
So if the Ravens front office moved to Cleveland, they would all of a sudden start drafting crappy?
Not trying to be a smartarse here, but if entirely different people are drafting, how would that relate to people drafting in the past?
See Oakland lately as an example of a team that did a 180 in the area of drafting with a changing of the guard.
Goff's going to be the better player.
With all the uncertainty that comes with developing a franchise QB when you don't have one, take the guy with the fewest open questions. Every unknown with developing a QB is a potential to fail on a pick. Who care's how strong the arm is if the guy would only be able to get a job putting stars on Christmas trees if he weren't a good college QB?
I think plenty of teams would take Goff over Wentz. Not Dallas, but many others. It says nothing bad about either player. just more of a preference.
I trust Peter King's sources more than I do many other insiders. Besides, there's really no advantage to the Browns keeping things under wraps. Either a team is going to give up a ransom to the Titans for the No. 1 pick, either Cleveland moves up one spot for considerable less or Cleveland takes the quarterback who is left.
I know there's a lot of smoke being blown by a lot of front offices, but if Adam Schefter, Peter King or Jay Glazer share tidbits of information, I tend to give them more weight than other insiders.
He also showed his *** last year as another click mongering pseudo-journalist.
He used to be very in touch with the heartbeat of the league. He hasn't really been an "insider" in a decade though.
Also, the relative majority of these guys are relying on the same "sources" for their information. It's very common among journalists. I say that to further emphasize that I don't believe King is more privy than these other guys.
I think this an entirely different group drafting this year.
We'll have to agree to disagree.