Moore fail or Dak Fail?

FVSTONE

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,243
Reaction score
3,167
oh, I am not saying and have continuously said it, its not all one or the other. its some of one and some of the other. Moore had issues, Dak has issues. together the issues became exacerbated.
and if Dak isn't going to win a championship, then Jerry totally screwed up. I don't blame Dak. he is what he is. he is not screwing up purposely, he just can't do it. so why in the heck jerry signed him. why did jerry handicap this team, why does jerry continuously do that. we all focus on Dak, as he is the QB, but there is a lot of crappy players with large contracts on this team that don't produce and the rest of the team is got holes. people on this board love to hate dak and some love him and he is polarizing and topic of 80% of posts on this board.

but Zeke? Lawrence? Gallup? Cooper crap? on and on and on. we tend to get just good enough, then throw money at players and we like our guys and not able to make the right trades or sign FAs to build a team the right way. Rams did it. tampa did it. eagles did it, SF did it. we haven't been able to do it for 27 years.
JJ signed Prescot because he was under serious pressure from EVERYONE to get a deal done, especially after he broke his ankle. All the football gods were saying Prescot was a great leader and a standup human being who was everything good about football, unfortunately something got into Prescot's head and he hasn't been the same since the start of the second half of season 2021. For some reason that QB who excelled under pressure is no more and can't pull the trigger in a timely manner when he has large defensive bodies around him. I don't think MM is going to be able to help since he has been around Prescot in both practices and game situations for a season and half of his QB funk. I sure MM would have intervened long ago if he had a fix for what is ailing Prescot. It's becoming vary apparent that Prescot's abilities don't play well in the NFL anymore.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,944
Reaction score
19,496
JJ signed Prescot because he was under serious pressure from EVERYONE to get a deal done, especially after he broke his ankle. All the football gods were saying Prescot was a great leader and a standup human being who was everything good about football, unfortunately something got into Prescot's head and he hasn't been the same since the start of the second half of season 2021. For some reason that QB who excelled under pressure is no more and can't pull the trigger in a timely manner when he has large defensive bodies around him. I don't think MM is going to be able to help since he has been around Prescot in both practices and game situations for a season and half of his QB funk. I sure MM would have intervened long ago if he had a fix for what is ailing Prescot. It's becoming vary apparent that Prescot's abilities don't play well in the NFL anymore.
JJ screwed up as JJ does. he could have signed him earlier for 25% cheaper and we would already been out of the contract. Stephen played hardball over a couple of million/year and he shot himself in the foot, because if you play hardball, you better have a back up plan in case they call your bluff and he didn't have a back up. Dak's agent knew they had leverage. that's on JJ and stephen. me, I ask for all I can ask for. they can say no and I go somewhere else, specially if I feel like I have leverage.

but to your point, after Mid season last year, probably after his leg injury in the NE game, he just hasn't quite been the same. very inconsistent. not sure why.
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
25,851
Reaction score
17,530
Well, when the blame falls on one player its becomes one sided. You provided no counterpoints to how it was not Dak’s fault. He went through no progressions and threw it to a receiver who was being zone covered by two defenders.
Who else did he have,
 

NumOneQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,432
Reaction score
3,764
So so wrong.

When Warner takes the first step to Lamb the right read is Hilton.

You guys thinking MLBer on WR you have to go to the WR. That's as dumb as Prescott's read.

The right read is the WR running down the other hash. Lead th WR to the inside, toward the post, and let him make a play.

Instead he throws it into coverage hoping his WR makes a play.

If you want your WR to make a play I know which option I'm going with. It's clear as day, but only the Prescott supporters are the one's that can't see it. Or see it but they can't and won't admit it.
You see the outside blitzer coming right at the snap in that formation you know the MLB has man on coverage in the slot. You’re not watching Warner to turn his back. That’s exactly what happens if you watch the film again and in a split second the QB throws it Ceedee. Blitzing on the right side means the slot has to be covered by the LBer. You can see the read and react. It was the Correct read all the way. Are you too air headed to understand they’ve probably seen this formation in film study and know SF will disguise the blitz and expect Warner to cover the slot vs empty backfield? I guarantee you they game planned this situation going empty set and know what to expect. This isn’t madden or peewee football. These guys watched a seasons worth of tape and know SF’s tendencies. Pull your head out of your *** because all you see are plays in Love Dak and Hate Dak. It’s simple football, you don’t have all day to throw the damn ball back there. Hold it and you’re getting sacked. Warner made a helluva play there.
 
Last edited:

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,837
Reaction score
37,296
Dak is a mental midget. Looked at the play once again, and he looks to the left before he turns the the right to throw it to Lamb.

It’s as pre-determined a play by a QB if there ever was one. He knew from the get go he was going to throw to Lamb, even though Hilton had open field.
 

12+88=7

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,570
Reaction score
3,057
You see the outside blitzer coming right at the snap in that formation you know the MLB has man on coverage in the slot. You’re not watching Warner to turn his back. That’s exactly what happens if you watch the film again and in a split second the QB throws it Ceedee. Blitzing on the right side means the slot has to be covered by the LBer. You can see the read and react. It was the Correct read all the way. Are you too air headed to understand they’ve probably seen this formation in film study and know SF will disguise the blitz and expect Warner to cover the slot vs empty backfield? I guarantee you they game planned this situation going empty set and know what to expect. This isn’t madden or peewee football. These guys watched a seasons worth of tape and know SF’s tendencies. Pull your head out of your *** because all you see are plays in Love Dak and Hate Dak. It’s simple football, you don’t have all day to throw the damn ball back there. Hold it and you’re getting sacked. Warner made a helluva play there.
It's amazing how this play was broken down by those who played in the NFL and they say that Lamb was the wrong read.

You say the LBer is blitzing but Prescott still got the pass off to Lamb. If he had made the correct read he still would have gotten the pass off to Hilton. The LBer means nothing because Prescott was able to make the pass.

Ball thrown into coverage versus ball thrown to an open receiver. Everyone sees it but you. Goodbye
 

NumOneQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,432
Reaction score
3,764
It's amazing how this play was broken down by those who played in the NFL and they say that Lamb was the wrong read.

You say the LBer is blitzing but Prescott still got the pass off to Lamb. If he had made the correct read he still would have gotten the pass off to Hilton. The LBer means nothing because Prescott was able to make the pass.

Ball thrown into coverage versus ball thrown to an open receiver. Everyone sees it but you. Goodbye
There are other analysts on this play posted, check those. You’re just spouting the same mess you sucked in from the clip in the top post. Now you’re convinced you’re an expert because you just hate the QB and you think anyone who points out the correct read is a Dak lover.
Basic football buddy, watch the play again. You don’t react to Warner turning his back. Stupid and this analyst is an idiot for saying that. I’ve never ever ever ever heard those words spouted during film session by any coach. Watch the LB and how he turns his back???? Keep making up BS so it fits your agenda.
 

12+88=7

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,570
Reaction score
3,057
There are other analysts on this play posted, check those. You’re just spouting the same mess you sucked in from the clip in the top post. Now you’re convinced you’re an expert because you just hate the QB and you think anyone who points out the correct read is a Dak lover.
Basic football buddy, watch the play again. You don’t react to Warner turning his back. Stupid and this analyst is an idiot for saying that. I’ve never ever ever ever heard those words spouted during film session by any coach. Watch the LB and how he turns his back???? Keep making up BS so it fits your agenda.
You're projecting. Agenda, no. But you yes.

I read the silliness that goes on between the pro Prescott supporters and the anti Prescott crowd. You are definitely in the pro Prescott camp.

Ok, forget the play. The reason Dallas lost was Prescott, facts. Let that simmer in your pea brain.
 

DickWhitman

Active Member
Messages
85
Reaction score
146
Dak fail. Should never have signed this very average talent to a huge contract that only the very best players deserve. Dak will never justify his contract. Wait and see.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,105
Reaction score
34,031
both failed. That said, we were just 2 games away from being in a SB. Mm must get the new OC right and we must draft well again.
 

Big_D

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,216
Reaction score
15,525
The combination wasn't working and you only have one option.
 

NumOneQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,432
Reaction score
3,764
You're projecting. Agenda, no. But you yes.

I read the silliness that goes on between the pro Prescott supporters and the anti Prescott crowd. You are definitely in the pro Prescott camp.

Ok, forget the play. The reason Dallas lost was Prescott, facts. Let that simmer in your pea brain.
Agenda? Laughable. You’re Prescott hater, obviously, so your arguments always come down to “oH knowS Ur Dak Luver”. You’re pointing the obvious out on why Dallas lost. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize bad QB play cost them a trip to the NFCCG. And you Dak Haters always resort to name calling when facts are thrown in your face. But you’re all of a sudden an expert after you see one stupid analyst pick apart a play on the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. “Duh, look at how the Lb turns his back1??!!” Too funny….
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,395
Reaction score
10,064
What makes it worse is that Hilton is running in the same area as Lamb. So it wasn't like Dak was looking way to the right on some sideline route and Hilton was open on the opposite side of the field.
Yeah TY was running straight to where Ceedee is. Dak is at fault for sure. But this should have been coached up to Dak. Where was Moore in coaching this to Dak?
 
Top