Let's take a closer look at the initiative. Here's a few myths ...
The Eagles are going to cut TO any way, so why not just wait until then ...
Wrong! You must think Eagles GM are fools! They know what they've got, and they are willing to barter for it. We've opened Pandora's Box, but through litigation, we were able to close it. We'll sell you, or any franchise the "box" for a lucrative trade/offer.
[
QUOTE]The Eagles aren't looking for a huge return for TO; Eagles want to dictate where TO goes if they can; so, if he can cut a deal with some AFC team, then they'd be willing to take maybe some depth player and a mid-round pick for him.
Actually, this myth has potential. I believe the Eagles are looking for a Huge return (see my comments above), but they may choose to send TO packing to an
AFC Team trade ...
Chargers Trade
Raiders (Moss trade)
Dolphins (Ricky Williams)
NFC
Commanders Trade (Arrington/Ramsey)
Cowboys Trade (Ellis/KeShawn)
Giants Trade (Burress/Shockey)
Bears (Brian Urlacher)
Question: I'm doing the research,
but perhaps someone else may have information regarding the legality of a TO trade. I read somewhere, perhaps a month ago, that we could not trade TO due to someting that came out of this recent arbitration.
If that's true ...then not only were the Eagles hurt by TOs off-the-field behavior, his lewd remarks about his QB, coaching staff, and various team members, but this TO saga would have gone down as the worst case of of a disruptive player in Eagles history.
If we cannot get a return on TO, then -- and only then, I say take him ...and I spit on the ground TO walks as closes the door to the Eagles locker-room (metaphorically speaking of course).