John813
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,735
- Reaction score
- 36,775
I would franchise tag Law.
Yes, the cap hit is huge but it helps us in multiple ways.
First, it allows us to not reach, or panic and take a DE too high as his replacement in the draft.
Second, it allows us to see him prove that he can stay healthy for multiple years and produce at an very good to elite level.
Third, this team has some holes throughout the roster. Some may be replaced by young guys like Woods, but others we need to invest in the draft/FA. I doubt we have a replacement on the squad for Witten. Not sure if someone like Brown can be a #2 WR, still have question marks at linebacker etc...
Making another hole, especially with the production Law is bringing would hurt quite a bit. Much better to eat one year of a franchise tag than either let him walk(no pass rush) or blow our load and give him a long term deal(which could backfire).
Yes, the cap hit is huge but it helps us in multiple ways.
First, it allows us to not reach, or panic and take a DE too high as his replacement in the draft.
Second, it allows us to see him prove that he can stay healthy for multiple years and produce at an very good to elite level.
Third, this team has some holes throughout the roster. Some may be replaced by young guys like Woods, but others we need to invest in the draft/FA. I doubt we have a replacement on the squad for Witten. Not sure if someone like Brown can be a #2 WR, still have question marks at linebacker etc...
Making another hole, especially with the production Law is bringing would hurt quite a bit. Much better to eat one year of a franchise tag than either let him walk(no pass rush) or blow our load and give him a long term deal(which could backfire).