Moving on from Beasley

I've seen this idea pop up in quite a few threads lately. I'm not sure what spawned this. Admittedly with being in vacation last week and some other personal business, I haven't been as plugged in as usual, but where did this come from?

Did a coach or FO person allude to something I missed? Is it people just wanting change for the sake of change? Do you believe the difference in play between Switzer and Beasley is negligible and therefore are ready to pass the torch?

Can someone shed a lite light and share their opinions on this? I sincerely don't get it. I like Beas. I like his attitude, his work ethic and his skill set. He's one of the few real "gamers" we have on offense.

So, clue me in, please.
My boy Beastley is the one constant that needs to be nurtured on offense. That Switzer guy can't hold Beastley's jock.
 
Who will be the tomahawk




*whew,I'm out whiskey & think I'll dry out for awhile, as I went thru 2 half gallon jugs in less than 6 days,,,,I've got one of those cold steel 'Vietnam style' tomahawks,it's got it's uses in the field of bush craft:thumbup:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,204
Messages
14,521,147
Members
24,208
Latest member
CowboysQC
Back
Top