My mock V.1 4 Rds

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
Dallas trades Romo to Denver for DEN RD1 and RD3 picks in 2017. Denver is most likely getting 2 RD3 comp picks this yr which makes giving up that 3rd easier for them.

RD1*DEN
Derek Barnett DE Tenn
Adding another pass rusher to the stable would only make this DL better. With Lawrence's back uncertainty and Gregory's drug addiction this would be a smart pick. Mayowa is not a starter, better to come off the bench and in passrush situations.

RD1
Trade to Bears that want Kizer QB. Dallas gets 35 overall and they swap RD3 picks.

RD2*CHI
Curtis Samuel WR Ohio State
Explosive athlete who plays all over the field. Can actually replace 2 players in Lucky and Dunbar and do what they do better. Would add that vertical game, and he probably runs the best slants in college football. Nobody seems to be able to stop that route when he runs it.

RD2
Gareon Conley CB Ohio State
Plays man and zone very good. Takes chances that sometimes gets him beat but wont make the same mistake twice. Good size and gets physical. Makes plays on the ball.

RD3*CHI
Connor McDermott OT UCLA
Free is coming to his end and Green is always injured. McDermott is a huge man, and played Myles Garrett very well this yr. Could be the future at RT.

RD3*DEN
Jarron Jones DT ND
Has had some injury problems in college, but is a guy who can just get after it in the middle of the DL. Can play both spots inside. Reminds me of McClain.

RD4
Travin Dural WR LSU
A player who probably went to the wrong college because of what they do with the ball. LSU focal point is the run game. Dural is a mismatch heaven. If Dallas loses TW they are going to need guys. Butler is a UFA too. Dural has the same athletic abilit as OBJ IMO
 

Bigdog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,858
Reaction score
11,511
I like it but I am not sure I would take another Wr that early but would like to get either a LB, S, or another DE (you could never have too many DE that can rush the passer). Good job though.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I like it but I am not sure I would take another Wr that early but would like to get either a LB, S, or another DE (you could never have too many DE that can rush the passer). Good job though.
WR is a top need. TWill and Butler are free agents and Dez is not consistent enough anymore to be a true #1.
 

Bigdog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,858
Reaction score
11,511
WR is a top need. TWill and Butler are free agents and Dez is not consistent enough anymore to be a true #1.
Your right but I am hoping we bring one of those guys back at a reasonable price. From what I read, there are some very good Wr's in this draft but would not mind if we grabbed these two.
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,941
Reaction score
8,681
I like it...there's just a lot of optimism with the trade and where Burnett and Conley are being picked though. Obviously too early for anyone to really say, but I'd be very surprised (and happy) if it went down like this
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
I like it but I am not sure I would take another Wr that early but would like to get either a LB, S, or another DE (you could never have too many DE that can rush the passer). Good job though.

Dallas having Irving, Lawrence, Barnett and Mayowa would be just fine. At some point next yr add in Gregory too. At LBer Dallas is young, Lee, Smith, Wilson, Hitchens, Nacho Wilber will be top 5 next yr. A LBer in this drat wouldnt sniff the field. S i could see but again i dont see much playing team behind Jones, Wilcox Church and Heath. This defense is young and getting better with playing time. Next yr this will be a top 10 defense. Add in the right part i could see it top 5. CB i could see. But i think this team will bring back Claiborne. Scandrick, Claiborne, Brown and Conley would be the active 4. Dallas only takes 4 CBs to a game because of Jones ability to move to CB and the S' being able to be swapped
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
I have a hard time seeing any team giving up a #1 for what will be a 37 Y/O Romo in 2017. I hope your right but I just dont see it. I think they'd be lucky to get a 2nd.
Saw this weekend Jimmy saying teams are going to line up for Romo.
 

The Realist

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,504
Reaction score
2,027
Dallas having Irving, Lawrence, Barnett and Mayowa would be just fine. At some point next yr add in Gregory too. At LBer Dallas is young, Lee, Smith, Wilson, Hitchens, Nacho Wilber will be top 5 next yr. A LBer in this drat wouldnt sniff the field. S i could see but again i dont see much playing team behind Jones, Wilcox Church and Heath. This defense is young and getting better with playing time. Next yr this will be a top 10 defense. Add in the right part i could see it top 5. CB i could see. But i think this team will bring back Claiborne. Scandrick, Claiborne, Brown and Conley would be the active 4. Dallas only takes 4 CBs to a game because of Jones ability to move to CB and the S' being able to be swapped

Correct. People overstate our need for D and don't take into account who is already on the roster and how they will get them and their all D drafts to the 46 man game day roster and on the field.
 

Hailmary

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,117
Reaction score
1,870
Saw this weekend Jimmy saying teams are going to line up for Romo.
That's fine, but if Romo hast a short list is 1 or 2 teams that he wants to be traded to and Jerry's compliant, it won't make a difference if a dozen teams line up for his services.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,309
Reaction score
32,715
Saw this weekend Jimmy saying teams are going to line up for Romo.

You think Denver is going to give up their No. 1 pick and a chance to draft Barnett even though they picked Paxton Lynch in the first last year?
Well, this is fantasy so ...

Oh, and not enough compensation from the Bears to jump up in the first and we merely swap RD 3s with them. Giving up their third all together, now we're getting warm. A second, third and fourth. Now we're talking.
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,941
Reaction score
8,681
Saw this weekend Jimmy saying teams are going to line up for Romo.

How long do you honestly think the list of teams that could compete for a super bowl next year that don't already have a QB is? Cardinals, Bills, Broncos, Texans, and maybe the Jets? Now how many of those teams can absorb $18M into their cap? And now how many of those teams will Romo approve a trade to?

A bidding war for Romo isn't going to happen. We are just going to have to rely on some shrewd negotiating and cross our fingers Romo stays healthy and plays well for his new team. It's most likely going to be something like a 4th that can easily get to a 3rd, should get to a 2nd as long as Romo doesn't get hurt and plays like he can, and a 1st if the team gets to the super bowl...or something like that.
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
How long do you honestly think the list of teams that could compete for a super bowl next year that don't already have a QB is? Cardinals, Bills, Broncos, Texans, and maybe the Jets? Now how many of those teams can absorb $18M into their cap? And now how many of those teams will Romo approve a trade to?

A bidding war for Romo isn't going to happen. We are just going to have to rely on some shrewd negotiating and cross our fingers Romo stays healthy and plays well for his new team. It's most likely going to be something like a 4th that can easily get to a 3rd, should get to a 2nd as long as Romo doesn't get hurt and plays like he can, and a 1st if the team gets to the super bowl...or something like that.
miami 43mil
az 39
den 38
hou 24
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
the argument all yr has been this team needs to start romo because he will give dallas the best chance at a superbowl. but people dont think teams will want him for a 1st and 3rd. go figure:laugh:
 

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
since we're talking about hypothetical trades to Denver. I'd give them Romo, our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd pick for Von Miller. :muttley::muttley:

But I love the draft ideas. Looks good!
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
How long do you honestly think the list of teams that could compete for a super bowl next year that don't already have a QB is? Cardinals, Bills, Broncos, Texans, and maybe the Jets? Now how many of those teams can absorb $18M into their cap? And now how many of those teams will Romo approve a trade to?

A bidding war for Romo isn't going to happen. We are just going to have to rely on some shrewd negotiating and cross our fingers Romo stays healthy and plays well for his new team. It's most likely going to be something like a 4th that can easily get to a 3rd, should get to a 2nd as long as Romo doesn't get hurt and plays like he can, and a 1st if the team gets to the super bowl...or something like that.
Anyone who trades for Romo is only on the hook for his base salaries. Also they probably work a new contract in any case.
 
Top