My Newest 09 Mock

[DaBoys4Life]

He's not great in coverage by any means, but then again, he's the strong side I.L.B. and is supposed to be the big run stuffer and is racking up tackles and seems like he's getting a sack a week the last month, he's havign a great season for us no matter his coverage.

In wade's Phillips scheme the leading tackler is supposed to be the WILB nice try thanks for playing.

 

[ThatsmyQB]

In wade's Phillips scheme the leading tackler is supposed to be the WILB nice try thanks for playing.

WHAT THE HECK does that have to do with the Strongside I.L.B. being the bigger run stuffer???
the weakside I.L.B. needs to be the better pass cover guy, NOT the Strongside where James plays, NICE TRY!
All of that is IRRELEVANT, James is KICKIN ASSS and having a GREAT SEASON for us Stuffing the run and blitzing the Q.B.!

OH and just to PROVE MY POINT about how great James is playing this season, you you say the I.L.B. is supposed to thethe leading tackler, well, zach Thomas is the W.I.L.B. and is SUPPOSED to be the leading tackler in Phillips defense AS YOU JUST SAID, yet funny thing happened when you ACTUALLY do your research, James has MORE TAKCLES then Thomas.

Zach Thomas has 80 tackles and 1 sack

James has 81 tackles and FIVE sacks yet in Phllips defense as you say, the Weakside I.L.B. is supposed to be the leading tackler, so buddy, next time, get your facts straight.

YOU DO THE MATH and get back to me again and try and tell me again James isn't havign a great season for us.

Just do me a favor and BE A MAN for ONCE IN YOUR LIFE and just ADMIT you were wrong on this one.

A wise man once said it's Better for people to think you're an idiot then to open your mouth and PROVE IT!
Nice try, THANKS FOR PLAYING! !

 

[DaBoys4Life]

WHAT THE HECK does that have to do with the Strongside I.L.B. being the bigger run stuffer???
the weakside I.L.B. needs to be the better pass cover guy, NOT the Strongside where James plays, NICE TRY!
All of that is IRRELEVANT, James is KICKIN ASSS and having a GREAT SEASON for us Stuffing the run and blitzing the Q.B.!

OH and just to PROVE MY POINT about how great James is playing this season, you you say the I.L.B. is supposed to thethe leading tackler, well, zach Thomas is the W.I.L.B. and is SUPPOSED to be the leading tackler in Phillips defense AS YOU JUST SAID, yet funny thing happened when you ACTUALLY do your research, James has MORE TAKCLES then Thomas.

Zach Thomas has 80 tackles and 1 sack

James has 81 tackles and FIVE sacks yet in Phllips defense as you say, the Weakside I.L.B. is supposed to be the leading tackler, so buddy, next time, get your facts straight.

YOU DO THE MATH and get back to me again and try and tell me again James isn't havign a great season for us.

Just do me a favor and BE A MAN for ONCE IN YOUR LIFE and just ADMIT you were wrong on this one.

A wise man once said it's Better for people to think you're an idiot then to open your mouth and PROVE IT!
Nice try, THANKS FOR PLAYING! !

2 Tackles for loss what a great run stuffer.......

 

[ThatsmyQB]

2 Tackles for loss what a great run stuffer.......

That's your COMEBACK???
I knew you were still and always will be a LITTLE KID, only when you canadmit you screwed up will you EVER BE A MAN!

I noticed you said NOTHING about how you were going off how in Phillips defense the W.I.L.b. is supposed to be the leading tackler YET it's JAMES who plays the STRONG SIDE who's the leading tackler for L.B.'s., or the fact he has 5 sacks on top of that, but in YOUR OPINION he's not having a good year for us cause he only has 2 tackles for losses. LOL


OF COURSE NOT, why would I expect you to ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG even though it's right here in BLACK AND WHITE for the whole world to see! LOL

but that's O.K., you're sitll a little KID and until you become a MAN and that day will come when you can admit you made a mistake, and I can clearly see after you made NUMEROUS mistakes and got proved werong on ALL OF THEM, this is your comeback anod NOTHING about how you were WRONG, usuallyyou just put that stupid emoticon . instead of admitting you were wrong or instead of actually trying to respond when you got proved wrong.

so my guess is you will repson with the logical

But that's what I expect from a LITTLE KID, one day when yu're a MAN you might wanna own up to your mistakes, MAYBE, ONE DAY!

 

[DaBoys4Life]

That's your COMEBACK???
I knew you were still and always will be a LITTLE KID, only when you canadmit you screwed up will you EVER BE A MAN!

I noticed you said NOTHING about how you were going off how in Phillips defense the W.I.L.b. is supposed to be the leading tackler YET it's JAMES who plays the STRONG SIDE who's the leading tackler for L.B.'s., or the fact he has 5 sacks on top of that, but in YOUR OPINION he's not having a good year for us cause he only has 2 tackles for losses. LOL


OF COURSE NOT, why would I expect you to ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG even though it's right here in BLACK AND WHITE for the whole world to see! LOL

but that's O.K., you're sitll a little KID and until you become a MAN and that day will come when you can admit you made a mistake, and I can clearly see after you made NUMEROUS mistakes and got proved werong on ALL OF THEM, this is your comeback anod NOTHING about how you were WRONG, usuallyyou just put that stupid emoticon . instead of admitting you were wrong or instead of actually trying to respond when you got proved wrong.

so my guess is you will repson with the logical

But that's what I expect from a LITTLE KID, one day when yu're a MAN you might wanna own up to your mistakes, MAYBE, ONE DAY!

I hate when people assume that I'm not a man because of my age....but i'll let it slide because it's the internet and next time you say something like that I'll just put you on ignore cause that really irks me.....w

He leads the team in tackles by 1 by the guy who should be leading the team in tackles big whoop.....5 sacks don't = run stuffer neither does two tackles for loss.....so what are you saying really?

 

[cowboysfan31]

I would say that Bradie James is more of a run ender than a run stuffer. He can get off of blocks and move downhill to make tackles, but more often than not the RBs will end up with a positive gain before he gets them down.

 

[ThatsmyQB]

I hate when people assume that I'm not a man because of my age....but i'll let it slide because it's the internet and next time you say something like that I'll just put you on ignore cause that really irks me.....w

I don't ASSUME anything, I know MEN who are 17 years old, AGE has nothing to do with it, I call you a KID and NOT A MAN caue you NEVER admit you are wrong, EVER, not just this instance, every other time i proved you wrong in the past you NEVER admitted you were wrong even with all the evidence that says you are. LOL
So it's not your age, and I am not assuming anyhting, I base oyu not being a MAN off of your own actions on this board.

He leads the team in tackles by 1 by the guy who should be leading the team in tackles big whoop....

So he's leading the team in tackles by the guy who is supposed to be the leading tackler in phillips defense and that doesn't tell you he's having a great season?
Am I missing something?

.5 sacks don't = run stuffer neither does two tackles for loss.....so what are you saying really?

LEADING TACKLER= RUN STUFFER!

**** I am saying James is having a great seaosn for us ****!
He's the leading tackle on a team where his positions isn't designed as you said to be the leadign tackler and alos has 5 sacks, so HOW THE F**K does that not = having a good season for us??????
Cause he only has 2 tackles for losses???
That's your arguement?

YOU THROW OUT leading tackler and 5 sacks and use the 2 tackles for losses as your bench mark on who's having a good season or not. LOL

In a 3-4, it's tought to get a lot of tackles for losses anyway as an I.L.b. cause of all the congestion int the middle with only 3 lineman in front of you with 5 O-lineman anyways, how do oyu not get that?

But regardless, LEADING TACKLER and 5 sacks in ANYONE'S book on the PLANET = having a GOOD SEASON EXCEPT YOU, but since you don't want to admit you're WRONG on the whole W.I.L.B. should be the leading tackler anyway ordeal and you can't admit he's having a good season cause that would admit you were WRONG, you trry and come up with LAMEST EXCUSE you can find on the guy and that is he oinly has 2 tackles for losses, so like I said, you COMPLETELY THROW OUT LEADING TACKLER and 5 SACKS< and use 2 tackles for losses to prove your point he's not having a good season, ALL BECAUSE you just can't admit you wereyou a MAN, cause you REFUSE to admit when you are wrong even in the face of the CLEAR SOTNE COLD FACTS saying you are wrong, so I'm done with you, I'm not gonna waste my time arguing with someone hwo refuses to admit he's wrong and can't b a MAN and admit he screwed up.

so you know what, James has 2 tackls for losses, so he MUST be having a bad season, HAPPY?

 

[DaBoys4Life]

I don't ASSUME anything, I know MEN who are 17 years old, AGE has nothing to do with it, I call you a KID and NOT A MAN caue you NEVER admit you are wrong, EVER, not just this instance, every other time i proved you wrong in the past you NEVER admitted you were wrong even with all the evidence that says you are. LOL
So it's not your age, and I am not assuming anyhting, I base oyu not being a MAN off of your own actions on this board.






So he's leading the team in tackles by the guy who is supposed to be the leading tackler in phillips defense and that doesn't tell you he's having a great season?
Am I missing something?




LEADING TACKLER= RUN STUFFER!

**** I am saying James is having a great seaosn for us ****!
He's the leading tackle on a team where his positions isn't designed as you said to be the leadign tackler and alos has 5 sacks, so HOW THE F**K does that not = having a good season for us??????
Cause he only has 2 tackles for losses???
That's your arguement?

YOU THROW OUT leading tackler and 5 sacks and use the 2 tackles for losses as your bench mark on who's having a good season or not. LOL

In a 3-4, it's tought to get a lot of tackles for losses anyway as an I.L.b. cause of all the congestion int the middle with only 3 lineman in front of you with 5 O-lineman anyways, how do oyu not get that?

But regardless, LEADING TACKLER and 5 sacks in ANYONE'S book on the PLANET = having a GOOD SEASON EXCEPT YOU, but since you don't want to admit you're WRONG on the whole W.I.L.B. should be the leading tackler anyway ordeal and you can't admit he's having a good season cause that would admit you were WRONG, you trry and come up with LAMEST EXCUSE you can find on the guy and that is he oinly has 2 tackles for losses, so like I said, you COMPLETELY THROW OUT LEADING TACKLER and 5 SACKS< and use 2 tackles for losses to prove your point he's not having a good season, ALL BECAUSE you just can't admit you wereyou a MAN, cause you REFUSE to admit when you are wrong even in the face of the CLEAR SOTNE COLD FACTS saying you are wrong, so I'm done with you, I'm not gonna waste my time arguing with someone hwo refuses to admit he's wrong and can't b a MAN and admit he screwed up.

so you know what, James has 2 tackls for losses, so he MUST be having a bad season, HAPPY?

I'm done with you.

 

[Biggems]

are you two married, cause you fight like a husband and wife.....get a flippin room already.

 

[ThatsmyQB]

are you two married, cause you fight like a husband and wife.....get a flippin room already.

The guy or should I say KID just can't EVER admit he's wrong.
I mean, how can Bradie James be the leading tackler, have 5 sacks, and he STILL says he's not having a good season for us ONLY BECAUSE he has only 2 tackles for losses? LOL

Because if he admitted that he'd have to admit he was WRONG, and just can't bring himself to admit he's wrong, so he finds the most miniscule little stat of 2 tackles for loses as his arguement that he's having a bad season for us and isn't a run stuffer, and throws out the facts that he has 5 sacks and is our leading tackler, and uses 2 tackles for losses as HIS evidence he's not a run stuffer and isn't having a good season for us. LOL

I got noe respect for anye who can't ever admit he's wrong EVER no matter how much overwhelming evidence that proves he's wrong. LOL

It's COMICAL!

I like the part where he says he's done with me right after I tell him I would never respond to him anymore though, that's CLASSIC!

 

[DaBoys4Life]

are you two married, cause you fight like a husband and wife.....get a flippin room already.

I'd rather put him on ignore.

 

[cowboysfan31]

In case anybody would like to watch some of these players, here's when they are playing today:

Rashad Johnson- 3PM central time on CBS

Ron Brace- 12PM central time on ABC

Connor Barwin- 10:30PM central time on ESPN2

Troy Nolan- 7PM central time on ESPN

 

[ThatsmyQB]

In case anybody would like to watch some of these players, here's when they are playing today:

Rashad Johnson- 3PM central time on CBS

Ron Brace- 12PM central time on ABC

Connor Barwin- 10:30PM central time on ESPN2

Troy Nolan- 7PM central time on ESPN

Cool, thanks a lot, if you could do this every saturday for us that would be great since I don't have the time to look up all this stuff.

Also, you have only Ron Brace on this list, was wondering if B.J. Raji got injured or anything?

 

[Biggems]

Cool, thanks a lot, if you could do this every saturday for us that would be great since I don't have the time to look up all this stuff.

Also, you have only Ron Brace on this list, was wondering if B.J. Raji got injured or anything?

perhaps he feels Raji is a late first, early 2nd

 

[cowboysfan31]

perhaps he feels Raji is a late first, early 2nd

These are just players I projected us taking in my mock. It's championship weekend so there won't be many chances left to do a list like this again this year. Maybe when all of the bowl games are announced I'll make a post with which prospects to watch in each game or something.

 

[ThatsmyQB]

perhaps he feels Raji is a late first, early 2nd

That would mean we'd have a shot at him, cause big N.T.'s built for a 3-4 usually drop, and there's always the possibility of us moving up if he is an earyl 2nd.
If so, does that mean he feels Johnson isn't a late 1st early 2nd?

Most people have Raji as early as #12 OVERALL, so you could be right that he might think he won't be there for us so why bother listing him, but he's worth a look if anyone is gonna be watching BC anyway since it could be interesting to see how Brace does (who's rated 4th/5th rd) against the SAME competition that Raji will be facing today and see how he compares to a possible 1st rounder in Raji.

 

[cowboysfan31]

That would mean we'd have a shot at him, cause big N.T.'s built for a 3-4 usually drop, and there's always the possibility of us moving up if he is an earyl 2nd.
If so, does that mean he feels Johnson isn't a late 1st early 2nd?

Most people have Raji as early as #12 OVERALL, so you could be right that he might think he won't be there for us so why bother listing him, but he's worth a look if anyone is gonna be watching BC anyway since it could be interesting to see how Brace does (who's rated 4th/5th rd) against the SAME competition that Raji will be facing today and see how he compares to a possible 1st rounder in Raji.

Raji has been my NT of choice in my previous mocks and I am a big fan of his. I feel like Brace is also an excellent player though and feel like both would be good NTs for us. I went with Brace over Raji this time because I feel like he'll be drafted a little bit later which allowed me to fill other needs earlier.

And no, I don't feel like Johnson is late 1st-early 2nd. I think he is solidly in the mid 2nd area, but I think he could easily fall into the 3rd. With all of the good OL coming out this year, I think that pushes Johnson down further than he would be in any other year. I can see atleast 4 OT's going before him (Andre and Jason Smith, Monroe, and Oher) plus Duke Robinson at G, and possibly Alex Mack at C. It's hard to be selected in the first 2 rounds when you're competing with guys like that.

 

[cowboysfan31]

BTW it looks like Brace might be out for today's game. He left last week's game with a toe injury and was supposed to play today, but I haven't seen him yet. So far though Raji hasn't done much, Brace's replacement is getting turned pretty much every play. Tyrod Taylor is making the BC defense look pretty bad right now.


And if anybody is interested in LB's, BC's Mark Herzlich is probably the best in the country. He wears number 94 just like Ware and plays just like him too. He managed to rack up 3 sacks, 10TFL, 6INTs, and 7 pass breakups this year.

 

[ThatsmyQB]

Raji has been my NT of choice in my previous mocks and I am a big fan of his. I feel like Brace is also an excellent player though and feel like both would be good NTs for us. I went with Brace over Raji this time because I feel like he'll be drafted a little bit later which allowed me to fill other needs earlier.

And no, I don't feel like Johnson is late 1st-early 2nd. I think he is solidly in the mid 2nd area, but I think he could easily fall into the 3rd. With all of the good OL coming out this year, I think that pushes Johnson down further than he would be in any other year. I can see atleast 4 OT's going before him (Andre and Jason Smith, Monroe, and Oher) plus Duke Robinson at G, and possibly Alex Mack at C. It's hard to be selected in the first 2 rounds when you're competing with guys like that.

I was talklin about Rashad Johnson, not herman Johnson.

 

[cowboysfan31]

I was talklin about Rashad Johnson, not herman Johnson.

Sorry, in that case I see Rashad Johnson being in the lower 1st to upper 2nd round. Safeties are a fickle thing though and I think there is a possibility that he could be had with our 2nd round pick. Herman has already been questioned in this thread, so when you said Johnson he is the first one that popped in my head.


As far as the BC NT's go, they've had a pretty good game. I didn't see Brace in the first half, but in the 2nd half he has been steady. He has been in the backfield several times and made a few big plays. For the most part he is just demanding double teams and clogging up the line. He did make a Cowboys-esque whiff on tackle in the backfield, though.