MySa Blog: Gannon ranks Romo No. 1 in NFC East

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
By Tom Orsborn on Aug 6, 09 03:04 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)

Former NFL QB Rich Gannon, the MVP of the 2002 season while with the Oakland Raiders, has joined SIRIUS NFL Radio's "The SIRIUS Blitz."

On the air yesterday, Gannon ranked Tony Romo as the top NFC East QB. He had the Eagles' Donovan McNabb No. 2, the Giants' Eli Manning at 3 and the Commanders' Jason Campbell bringing up the rear.

Here are Gannon's thoughts on Romo, McNabb and Manning:

ROMO: "I think now that he's dumped Jessica Simpson, he's got the golf clubs in the closet, he's able to focus, he's got rid of T.O., I look for him to have a great year, absorb and take on more of that leadership with the Cowboys. I just think he's got the best skills of all those quarterbacks. ... He's a great competitor. He's got a little bit of that gunslinger mentality like Brett Favre. He's willing to take chances. I really think he's probably going to have his best year in the absence of T.O."

McNABB: "Tony Romo ahead of Donovan McNabb, it's by just a hair. I think that Donovan McNabb is a solid player in Philadelphia. I think he certainly gives them the best chance to win. Remarkable run, all those championship games that they've been to. But they haven't gotten over the hump and that's the thing that concerns me a little bit. The other thing is, I'd love to see Donovan McNabb stay in Philadelphia in the offseason and train with that football team. I just have a hard time with a guy who packs up at the end of the season and moves out to Arizona; he lives out there and works out there. I just think, in this day and age, with the amount of money you're talking about and the importance of that offseason program, that I want my quarterback in town in Philadelphia."

MANNING: "I think he's gotten better each year and that's certainly something the Giants are very aware of. He had his best year last year in terms of his completion percentage, up around 60 percent, his passer rating [was] 86. The thing that has always concerned me about him is his completion percentage. Not the most accurate guy, just a career completion percentage around 55 percent. But I will say this: the Manning boys are tough. They are great competitors. They are tremendous leaders. He's the perfect fit for Tom Coughlin and that offense and that football team. ... The other thing I like about him is he lines up and plays every week. Four years in a row he has not missed a game. I look for consistency at that position and he brings it to that football team."
 

BIGDen

Dr. Freakasaurus
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
902
I agree. Romo is a top 5 (in the league) QB in my opinion.

McNabb is dangerous and has had a good career.

Manning is average to above average at most. I live in NJ and have seen just about every game he's played for the Giants. He needs lots of help to succeed. He's not accurate. He doesn't create opportunities. He's not mobile. He had a top D, top running game, but lost his 6'6" life saver and failed miserably last year. He has looked ordinary or less than that most of his career. He had a nice game at GB in the '07 playoffs, but was ordinary against Dallas and the Bucs. He did nothing the whole game against the Pats in the SB and threw TWO game-losing picks which were dropped (pure luck). Then he desperately throws a duck that sticks to a scrubs helmet and he's a hero. Whatever. That guy is the 3rd best QB in his division and, remarkably, he's the highest paid QB in the league. Good for him. He seems like a pretty nice guy, just not a very good QB.
 

DragonCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,498
Reaction score
250
Guy in my lab said that Romo was the worst in the NFC east and in the bottom half of NFL QBs. He also said that Aikman never started in college, so, yeah.
 

BIGDen

Dr. Freakasaurus
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
902
DragonCowboy;2870743 said:
Guy in my lab said that Romo was the worst in the NFC east and in the bottom half of NFL QBs. He also said that Aikman never started in college, so, yeah.

Was it a meth lab?
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Rampage;2870752 said:
I put Mcnabb slightly ahead of Romo.
Even with his putrid 86.4 career QB rating (despite playing in the QB rating-friendly west coast offense)?
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
theogt;2870756 said:
Even with his putrid 86.4 career QB rating (despite playing in the QB rating-friendly west coast offense)?
well he's played for 10 years with no weapons other than a rb and almost always has them contending. a lot of people on this site underrate McNabb so much it's funny.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Rampage;2870764 said:
well he's played for 10 years with no weapons other than a rb and almost always has them contending. a lot of people on this site underrate McNabb so much it's funny.
I just think he's too bizarrely inconsistent to be considered near the top of QBs. He has a habit of throwing at the feet of receivers.
 

BIGDen

Dr. Freakasaurus
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
902
Rampage;2870764 said:
well he's played for 10 years with no weapons other than a rb and almost always has them contending. a lot of people on this site underrate McNabb so much it's funny.

I agree with you. He's done a lot with a little for the most part. I think Romo is better, but I respect your opinion about giving the edge to McNabb. He is definitely underrated by many.

That QB rating of his is not bad at all.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
Rampage;2870764 said:
well he's played for 10 years with no weapons other than a rb and almost always has them contending. a lot of people on this site underrate McNabb so much it's funny.
McNabb isn't the only on this site who's underrated.
 

BIGDen

Dr. Freakasaurus
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
902
theogt;2870768 said:
I just think he's too bizarrely inconsistent to be considered near the top of QBs. He has a habit of throwing at the feet of receivers.

"Bizarrely inconsistent", well put. It's true. He's a talent that looks unstoppable at times, yet other times he is just awful missing wide open receivers. Having said that, I think he is a very good QB who regularly has his team in contention despite almost a career-long void at WR.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
BIGDen;2870771 said:
That QB rating of his is not bad at all.
It's not that bad, but it does put him somewhere around the likes of Matt Schaub, David Garrard and Jake Delhomme in terms of active QBs. Not exactly guys you look to when discussing top QBs.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
theogt;2870782 said:
It's not that bad, but it does put him somewhere around the likes of Matt Schaub, David Garrard and Jake Delhomme in terms of active QBs. Not exactly guys you look to when discussing top QBs.
yeah but none of those guys are anywhere near as good as McNabb and Garrard and Shaub have played for only like 2 or 3 years so the qb rating(a stat i really don't care for) is irrelevant in the discussion.
 

BIGDen

Dr. Freakasaurus
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
902
theogt;2870782 said:
It's not that bad, but it does put him somewhere around the likes of Matt Schaub, David Garrard and Jake Delhomme in terms of active QBs. Not exactly guys you look to when discussing top QBs.

Look at his "body of work". Look at what he's had to work with (very few weapons overall). He has been a big reason why his teams have contended. Although I think QB rating is important, it doesn't tell the whole story. Our beloved Aikman only had an 81.6 career passer rating. He was cearly better than that.

Ok. Now we need to stop this. I'm feeling a but uncomfortable with all this defending of McNabb :puke: .
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Rampage;2870788 said:
yeah but none of those guys are anywhere near as good as McNabb and Garrard and Shaub have played for only like 2 or 3 years so the qb rating(a stat i really don't care for) is irrelevant in the discussion.
Why on earth would you not care for QB rating? It has the highest correlation with winning percentage of any stat? Obviously it's the best stat there is in terms of determining any players impact on winning games.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
theogt;2870799 said:
Why on earth would you not care for QB rating? It has the highest correlation with winning percentage of any stat? Obviously it's the best stat there is in terms of determining any players impact on winning games.
like Troy Aikman?
 
Top