OmerV
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,925
- Reaction score
- 22,449
I just checked out the lyrics. I was cracking up.The end of one lyric is "... so we can both watch X-Files".
I just checked out the lyrics. I was cracking up.The end of one lyric is "... so we can both watch X-Files".
He contributed playmaking on the D-Line. As a part time player in Dallas, and in only 9 games, he was 2nd on the team in tackles for loss and 3rd on the team in both QB sacks and QB hits.
The offsides were frustrating, but that was really one game, and a game we won. Don't exaggerate that into a suggestion it happened constantly and overrode any good he did.
Well, Define brilliant. I can think of good solid franchise decisions.
Grabbing Amari, since he is heads and tails better than any receiver available in 1st round of the draft.
Drafting LVE who everbody thought was a reach. Had a great rookie year.
Drafting Zeke over Ramsey. Ramsey is a childish tool.
Let's not forget about Taco, or Gregory, or......
I see you ignored tackles for loss …He had 4 sacks in 9 games. Let's not turn other guys on the team not getting sacks into him doing well at getting sacks.
Just one game? He had 8 Offsides, Neutral Zone Infractions, or Encroachment penalties and 3 games with multiple penalties. It was consistent (or constant). However...nearly half of his QB hits did come from one game (the hapless Giants with Jones).
The defense allowed 4 points more per game after he arrived (not saying this was because of him). So, what exactly did bringing him in accomplish? He was just a guy.
I see you ignored tackles for loss …
I don't know why posters think drafting Martin was such a big deal, that's where he was supposed to go, late 1st round.
There is a lot more to football, especially on the line than making some plays.I see you ignored tackles for loss …
lol - you say you aren't blaming him for the team allowing more points per game, yet you are using that to say that bringing him in didn't accomplish anything. That's pretty contradictory. For all you know he was a main reason the opponents didn't score even more after he came.
In the end, if he made more plays than the guys on the team before he came, that IS a contribution. It doesn't have to be All-Pro level to be a contribution, it just has to be better than they were getting.
I don't know why posters think drafting Martin was such a big deal, that's where he was supposed to go, late 1st round.
Taking Yosemite is a bigger deal to me but they had inside info on him.
Just give me one decision this team has made in the last 5 years, that was brilliant?
can you trust this clown show with the upcoming decisions
1. what to do with the Clapping Carrot
2. the Dak contract
3. the Cooper contract
4. the Byron Jones contract
I guess drafting Zeke and Dak and trading for Amari were just throwing darts at a wall decision process?Just give me one decision this team has made in the last 5 years, that was brilliant?
can you trust this clown show with the upcoming decisions
1. what to do with the Clapping Carrot
2. the Dak contract
3. the Cooper contract
4. the Byron Jones contract
Did the defense get worse, or would it have looked even worse without Bennett?There is a lot more to football, especially on the line than making some plays.
And no, I am not blaming him. I am not saying he is responsible for the increase in points allowed. I am pointing out that things didn't get better with him.
We gave up resources for a rental. During that rental, the defense got worse and the team lost more games. How is that a good move?
Quinn. Got value out of him than Lawrence.