Riggo#44 said:
So which one is it? Did Taylor get smoked or did Williams? (Besides Taylor was a rookie that year - how long has Williams been in the league?)
Lets see - the witnesses in the Taylor case are a bunch of thugs who stole some ATVs. Irvin had to plea his way out of trouble, and got busted again after that. You think Irvin's drug habit only hurts him? Tell that to a drug addicts family, tell that to someone who has watched a loved one overdose. That's just ignorant.
The best you can come up with is Jurgenson and Manley. How about Irvin, Newton, Williams, Tuinei, Hollywood Henderson, and if you want to talk about guns, let's talk about Barry Switzer...
Its funny how you give Taylor the benifit of the doubt that he may be inocent because a bunch of thugs stole his ATV ?
Yet these same "Thugs" as you call them are automatically guilty.
Of course, giving you the benifit of the doubt and the "Thugs" are guilty of stealing his ATV's, that still does not change the fact that Mr. Taylor is not allowed to pull an armed weapon out on them.
There is a reason for the law in Florida, its to stop people from doing exactly what Mr. Taylor is being "Charged" with good sir. If someone steals a possesion of yours...and especially if you have an idea of who and where they are. You should call the propper authorities and ask them to retrieve your posessions for you.
I'm sure we will have plenty to discuss once this trial is over.
From what I understand is that Mr. Taylor has to prove that he indeed did not pull a gun on deese yutes.
Tell your buddy I said good luck.
Good day to you sir.
PS, your right, this is all in good fun. I'm having a blast !
:
