Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,834
- Reaction score
- 103,558
Again you just repeat this because it emotionally seems relevant to you; however, anyone involved in statistical analysis would consider starter vs starter stats to be more specific than just season totals.
Feel free to call out to them for support of your position. And both you and they can take the time to continue to debate the validity of the numbers even further than that. You can break them down by down and distance, area of the field, players they ran behind, players they ran against. Take it wherever else you feel it needs to go. I have all the numbers I need to validate my position, I don't need anyone to approve of them or validate or attempt to invalidate them.
Selective intrepretation would be if I tried to omit certain games or that type of thing. Just using the most specific stats of when they were starters is not gerrimandering.
Sure it is. I don't care who's name gets called before the game to know who performed better.
Because when people find stats they don't like, they simply find new ways to try to undermine and invalidate them. And they fail.