.......... recp yards td
Swann 336 5462 51
Pearson 489 7822 48
fredp22, also:
Pearson: 3 Pro Bowls, 3x 1st team All Pro, 1x 2nd team All Pro
Swann: 3 Pro Bowls, 1x 1st team All Pro, 2x 2nd team All Pro
Swann gets in because:
(1) He played for Pittsburgh
(2) He made spectacular plays and/or scored in SBs X, XIII, XIV
(3) He played for Pittsburgh
Drew is on the outside looking in because:
(1) He played for Dallas
(2) Instead of lining up against Aaron Kyle, Benny Barnes and Mark Washington, he had to face Mel Blount in two SBs
(3) He played for Dallas
Swann made two spectacular catches in SB X, had four catches for 161 yards, and without him, the Steelers would have struggled to score 7 points vs. the Cowboys defense in that game.
In SB XIII, he made a leaping catch in the end zone that only a handful of WRs in the history of the NFL could have made.
Drew was steadier, more durable and more productive; Swann flashier and the far more gifted athlete.
Actually, in SBX Washington had good coverage-position on Swann on his leaping catch up the right sideline and on his highlight reel catch up the middle of the field later in the game. Jerry Rice would not have made the first catch and likely would not have made the second - that's how spectacular Swann was in that game.
In SBXIII, Swann went high into the Miami sky to catch a TD over Cliff Harris and Charlie Waters. I can't think of any WR from the 70s (maybe Lance Alworth?) who makes that catch in SBXIII. For 99.9% of receivers that was an overthrown ball from Bradshaw.
For those reasons I have no problem with Swann being in Canton. In big games he was at his absolute best.
If pinned against a wall, I'd have to confess that I think Swann and Paul Warfield were better than Drew. Those guys deserved Canton. As did John Stallworth. I also think Pearson belongs in the Hall. What is keeping him out other than anti-Cowboys bias?