SlammedZero
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,747
- Reaction score
- 42,546
My initial reaction is that it sucks. I'm willing to give it a chance though. Just seems so weird, like I am not watching an NFL game. lol
My initial reaction is that it sucks. I'm willing to give it a chance though. Just seems so weird, like I am not watching an NFL game. lol
there are not that many injuries; and the NFL claiming they care is just for PR purposes. Here is a clue: NONE of these changes were requested by the players or players union.This is a big change and it is going to take some time for fans to adjust to the new rules. But I prefer the old rules. I h ave no problem kicking every kickoff into the end zone for a touch back. The few kickoff returns we see every year are some of the most exciting plays in football, but that's because they are rare.
I know they changed the rule because of injuries, but I haven't seen any stats on injuries during kickoffs. Are there really that many injuries on kickoffs? And what about punts? Less injuries?
Yeah kickoff had a significantly higher number of injuries. It was something around 30% of all ACL injuries happened on kickoffs and the concussions were something like 7x higher but I don't have a source to point to to confirm those numbers.This is a big change and it is going to take some time for fans to adjust to the new rules. But I prefer the old rules. I h ave no problem kicking every kickoff into the end zone for a touch back. The few kickoff returns we see every year are some of the most exciting plays in football, but that's because they are rare.
I know they changed the rule because of injuries, but I haven't seen any stats on injuries during kickoffs. Are there really that many injuries on kickoffs? And what about punts? Less injuries?
4th and 12 is too short. It has to be more difficult to mirror the almost impossible odds of an onside kick. Something like 4th and 25 or higher.Which is why I think a team should have a choice between an onside kick or a 4th and 12 conversion.
percentages sound great but sometimes the actual numbers are very small and since medical science can almost alwqays fix this maybe that is why the players union has not requested any of theses rule changesYeah kickoff had a significantly higher number of injuries. It was something around 30% of all ACL injuries happened on kickoffs and the concussions were something like 7x higher but I don't have a source to point to to confirm those numbers.
Punts are not as bad and this new kickoff is essentially set up to sort of replicate a punt return type of play
Here is what the NFL likely found and used as its basis to change the kickoff rule...This is a big change and it is going to take some time for fans to adjust to the new rules. But I prefer the old rules. I h ave no problem kicking every kickoff into the end zone for a touch back. The few kickoff returns we see every year are some of the most exciting plays in football, but that's because they are rare.
I know they changed the rule because of injuries, but I haven't seen any stats on injuries during kickoffs. Are there really that many injuries on kickoffs? And what about punts? Less injuries?
I do hate the new rules when it comes to onside kicks and hope they figure something out there. Ultimately though you're going to get more plays that can impact games by actually have some sort of kickoff rather than having 70% go for touchbacks and 1-2 surprise onside kicks per season.percentages sound great but sometimes the actual numbers are very small and since medical science can almost alwqays fix this maybe that is why the players union has not requested any of theses rule changes
Remember the SB when the Saints did the onside kick by surprise; that opportunity is now gone
Can’t agree with you on that one my good friend.Which is why I think a team should have a choice between an onside kick or a 4th and 12 conversion.
I think it was Philly for the past 3 or 4 years proposed a 4th and 20 play. But can't remember from what yard line.4th and 12 is too short. It has to be more difficult to mirror the almost impossible odds of an onside kick. Something like 4th and 25 or higher.
Thanks, this is interesting but note that this analysis combines kickoffs and punts when looking at specific types of injuries, including head and knee. Maybe they have more data to show kickoffs are more dangerous than punts?Here is what the NFL likely found and used as its basis to change the kickoff rule...
Here is the article describing in full detail of their in-depth investigation and analysis of all NFL injuries from 2017 - 2021, the different types of injuries and which happened either during kickoff / punts or regular plays in the NFL.
https://www.sportsinfosolutions.com/2022/04/06/study-what-is-so-dangerous-about-special-teams-plays/
Correct. Excellent clarification brother.Thanks, this is interesting but note that this analysis combines kickoffs and punts when looking at specific types of injuries, including head and knee. Maybe they have more data to show kickoffs are more dangerous than punts?
Also, this study deals in percentages not numbers. So if the number of head injuries on kickoffs is hypothetically 5 in a year out of 20 total, 25% sounds bad, but if we assume 6 kickoffs per game over 17 games there are 3264 kickoffs per year. How many head injuries is significant given that number of actual plays?
Also, given the new rule incentivizes kicking teams to kick the ball in play forcing a runback, instead of kicking the ball into the end zone and spotting the ball on the 25 with no runback, will result in more injuries.
As I said, I don't like this radical rule change But I can be open minded.
Most data points shows as percentages when dealing with injuries because so many go unreported, especially head injuries. Last year the NFL reported 219 concussions. If we use the chart AC shared we can assume roughly 17% of those happened on a punt/kickoff. My guess is that the majority of these are kickoff related, but we can just split it in half to simplify things which comes out to roughly 19 concussions. This is not a super high number that you'll be able to substantially cut into.Thanks, this is interesting but note that this analysis combines kickoffs and punts when looking at specific types of injuries, including head and knee. Maybe they have more data to show kickoffs are more dangerous than punts?
Also, this study deals in percentages not numbers. So if the number of head injuries on kickoffs is hypothetically 5 in a year out of 20 total, 25% sounds bad, but if we assume 6 kickoffs per game over 17 games there are 3264 kickoffs per year. How many head injuries is significant given that number of actual plays?
Also, given the new rule incentivizes kicking teams to kick the ball in play forcing a runback, instead of kicking the ball into the end zone and spotting the ball on the 25 with no runback, will result in more injuries.
As I said, I don't like this radical rule change But I can be open minded.
They should make it from your own 10 so if you don't make it, the other team is already in FG range or goal-to-go if they want to try for a TD. All desperate teams would try it when they have no other option but the mechanics would result in higher margins of victory so I'm not sure Vegas or the NFL would want that. The closer the game, the better for them.I think it was Philly for the past 3 or 4 years proposed a 4th and 20 play. But can't remember from what yard line.
The kickoff in terms of garnering up returns was 100% broke. They moved up the kickoffs by 5 yards to the 35 and NFL kickers can routinely boot it out of the endzone now. This is a list of team by team and the touchback percentage.Fixing what wasn't broke.