Newman Tackle on Moss

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Moss is a big guy what 8 years in the league? - I don't think he was ever "world class" speedster. League is catching up to him but he's still a huge threat.
 

followthestar

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,164
Reaction score
173
Moss' first couple years, i doubt a handful of guys could catch him. no doubt he's slowed a step - now maybe a dozen guys in the league could catch him... you gotta figure when he's steppin out he's goin all the way...
 

50cent

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,804
Reaction score
572
I thought TNew sucked, where is all of this love coming from now?
 

Meat-O-Rama

Vegetarians are so stupid.
Messages
2,615
Reaction score
614
He showed great catch up speed on the first of Santana Moss's TD catches as well. He just ran out of space, but he was closing fast.
 

Fla Cowpoke

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,025
Reaction score
12,046
Moss was one of the fastest guys in the league his first few seasons...supposedly ran in the 4.2's in college. He is not that fast now...probably a 4.4-4.5 guy. But those guys usually do not get run down from behind.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
I still think Angles came into play

Tnew actually had a head start in pursuit. Moss was running a deep crossing pattern that carried him to right sidelines from left and there aws a tad slowdown on catch. And a tad Moss overconfident that no one could run him down.

Kinda like that Green play running down Dorsett.
 

FRDRCK

DeWare94
Messages
973
Reaction score
15
has anybody noticed someting weird about newman's legs?

it seems they are curved weird or something
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Double Trouble said:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/nfl/20050418-9999-1s18forty.html

No one in the NFL can actually run 4.2. I think you can probably take every good time ever reported and add at least .1 to it.

As an ex sprinter / hurdler you are 100% right. All these college times are hand held and done by many who are clueless. It literally takes .005 to .01 seconds to physically hit the start button on the start gun. Thats why electronic times tend to be 1/10 of a second "slower" than hand times.....

You hear the word "slow track" at the combine. Thats BS - Its "real" time. Bo, Deion are on a short list of anyone whoever broke 4.3 at combine I believe.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Newman ran a 6.62 60 meters and a 10.20 100 meters in college, which means there's no question he's one of the fastest players in the league. And those are fully electronic times, so you know they're accurate.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
it's virtually impossible for some1 to run under a 4.3 40, those 4.2 times you see, are hand-timed, not very accurate
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
it's not just straight-line speed that Moss possesses, or used to possess, but his long legs, long-striders, with speed, can get down the field in a hurry
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Electronic times = real

Hand times are bs and always 1/10 of a second faster usually.

I ran a 7.65 electronic 55M hurdle. Not shabby!
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
yep, wish I scrolled through this thread more, so that I didn't have to say the exact same thing you said lol
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
summerisfunner said:
it's virtually impossible for some1 to run under a 4.3 40, those 4.2 times you see, are hand-timed, not very accurate

It's not impossible. When Asafa Powell set the world record in the 100 meters, he covered the first 40 yards in 4.25 seconds.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
summerisfunner said:
Adam DANG YOU AND YOUR STATS!! lol just kidding man, touche


Adam is right, but your point still stands. Most of the people that all these NFL commentators blab on about running a 4.2 don't really run a 4.2. It is possible to run that fast, but I'd say (guessing here) only about 10% of the people that have been "reported" as running a 4.2 actually really do run a 4.2.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
And apparently, when Maurice Greene ran a 9.82 in 1999, he covered the first 40 yards in 4.18 seconds. His splits were 1.69 for the first 10 meters (tied for the fastest ever), 1.00 for the second 10 meters (tied for the fastest ever), 0.92 for the third 10 meters and 0.86 for the fourth 10 meters. So he covered the first 30 meters in 3.61 seconds. Since 40 yards is 36.576 meters, we have to extrapolate the next 6.576 meters, and it comes out to 0.57 seconds. Total running time over 40 yards: 4.18 seconds.
 
Top