NewyScruggs Blog: Quick Thoughts From Texas Stadium and L. Fitzgerald in '08?

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Monday, October 01, 2007

Quick Thoughts From Texas Stadium


This is what I liked from the Cowboys 35-7 win over the Rams at Texas Stadium.

1. The Cowboys are 4-0 and the defense is getting better.

2. The D didn't allow a Rams touchdown.

3. Terence Newman came in for an injured Anthony Henry and held Torry Holt without a TD.

4. The secondary hasn't allowed a TD pass since Week 2 in Miami.

5. Linebacker Greg Ellis making his season debut and getting a sack and half.

6. Wide receiver Patrick Crayton bounced back after dropping a sure TD pass in Chicago. Crayton caught seven balls for 184 yards and two TD's.

7. Nobody is missing Terry Glenn.

8. Everything Tony Romo brings to the team. Four total TD's. 339 yards passing.

9. Safety Ken Hamlin's hits and interception in the end zone.

10. Rams wide receiver Issac Bruce leaving the game with a "injury" after going on the radio to guarantee a win over the Cowboys.

11. 502 yards of offense by the Cowboys.

12. Just 62 yards of rushing by the Rams.

13. Rams just 25% on third downs.

14. Wade Phillips is the first coach in team history to start 4-0 in his first season.

15. The only other team in the NFC that is undefeated....Green Bay.

Here's what I did not like from the Cowboys 35-7 win.

1. Special teams coverage. Dante Hall ran back a punt 82 yards and combined for 266 yards. They missed Keith Davis who was out with an injury.

2. Seeing corner Anthony Henry leave the game with a high ankle sprain.

3. The slow start by the Cowboys offense again in the first quarter.

4. The slew of dropped passes by Cowboy receivers. I know of at least 65 yards they let slip away.

Newy Scruggs
http://www.newdawg.com/

Posted at 7:24 AM

Friday, September 28, 2007

Larry Fitzgerald A Cowboy In 2008?


Profootballtalk.com recently posted a story about the unhappiness of Arizona Cardinals wide receiver, Larry Fitzgerald. The Cardinals are becoming a run first club under new head coach Ken Wisenhunt which means Fitzgerald's numbers will go down. He may not be down for that blocking thing either.

The Cowboys should consider making a move for him after the season. Why not give up a first day pick for him? The Cowboys need to get younger at the position. Fitzgerald is just 23 years old and in his fourth NFL season.

Arizona locked up Anquan Boldin to a big extention two years ago and they may not want to pay big money for two wide receivers in a run first offense. The Cardinals have always had a reputation as a cheap organization. Fitzgerald will want to be paid big dollars.

They still have Bryant Johnson, a former first round pick on their roster.

Terry Glenn is 33 years old and will miss at least half of the year with a knee injury. Patrick Crayton is a free agent after the season and Terrell Owens is only signed through 2008.

Giving the Cardinals a first day draft pick for a proven commodity would be smart business. Imagine a 2008 starting lineup of Fitzgerald, T.O., and tight end Jason Witten. Scary.

Here's more on why think the Cowboys should try to make the move. If the Cowboys use a first round draft pick on a kid, they still need the rookie to develop. Taking a receiver in the first round is a true gamble.

In 2005 the following players were drafted in the first round:

Braylon Edwards, 3rd to Cleveland
Troy Williamson, 7th to Minnesota
Mike Williams, 10th to Detroit
Matt Jones, 21st to Jacksonville
Mark Clayton, 22nd to Baltimore
Roddy White, 27th to Atlanta

Not one of those players has made the Pro Bowl. Edwards looks like the only one who will be an impact player for his club this season.

In 2006 Santonio Holmes was the only WR drafted in the first round. Teams learned from the 2005 class.

So why not give up a 1st or 2nd round draft pick and pay Fitzgerald big money? It looks like a safe way to go versus trying to gamble in the draft.

Newy Scruggs
www.newdawg.com

Posted at 8:31 AM
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
i'd trade our 2nd or 3rd for fitz in a heartbeat! cross that problem off in a most serious manner!
 

QT

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,571
Reaction score
855
Please get Fitzgerald!!! He's better then any WR coming out of college. Trade a #1 for him.
 

adamknite

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,226
Reaction score
805
iceberg;1681042 said:
i'd trade our 2nd or 3rd for fitz in a heartbeat! cross that problem off in a most serious manner!

I wouldn't mind trading our first for him. I wouldn't trade Cleveland's though
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
I'm down with this one. Fitzgerald would be nasty lining up across from Owens.
 

zrinkill

Cowboy Fan
Messages
49,043
Reaction score
32,552
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I would trade our number 1 in a heartbeat. Then use Cleveland's to take BPA of need.
 

Portland Fanatic

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,488
Reaction score
31
I would love to have Fitz...even give up our second first rounder for him, BUT what kind of $$$ are we talking here? Romo and T-New come to mind here.

There is no doubt I'd take him over any other WR in this years draft, but we have to fit these guys under the cap.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
adamknite;1681054 said:
I wouldn't mind trading our first for him. I wouldn't trade Cleveland's though

heh, i'm starting the lowball but yes, i'd trade our #1 for him provided it does wind up being the lesser pick. :)

imagine this:

michael turner - UFA
larry fitzgerald - trade 1st/2nd round pick for
cleveland pick - bad arse NT (depending on how TANK does) or simply bpa

we go into the draft and suddenly are not gambling near as much and got quality at RB *and* WR before we even make a rookie pick.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
I'd give them the Browns pick if they asked nicely. There's not a receiver in this draft that is in Fitzgerald's league.

Dude is only 24 years old.
 

Portland Fanatic

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,488
Reaction score
31
iceberg;1681074 said:
heh, i'm starting the lowball but yes, i'd trade our #1 for him provided it does wind up being the lesser pick. :)

imagine this:

michael turner - UFA
larry fitzgerald - trade 1st/2nd round pick for
cleveland pick - bad arse NT (depending on how TANK does) or simply bpa

we go into the draft and suddenly are not gambling near as much and got quality at RB *and* WR before we even make a rookie pick.

Getting Fergy back and having Tank should cover the NT for a couple years...and we know Rat can play well there. I'd like to see Rat move to LDE and then we have trade options with Spears. I'd pick a big NT in rounds 4 or 5 if we have any concerns left.
 

dogunwo

Franchise Tagged
Messages
10,322
Reaction score
5,702
iceberg;1681042 said:
i'd trade our 2nd or 3rd for fitz in a heartbeat! cross that problem off in a most serious manner!
I mean seriously............what would be the downside of that?
 

NorthTexan95

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,463
Reaction score
2,482
I love the idea of trading for an established receiver or signing a free agent MUCH more than spending a high pick on one. Fitzgerald would be terrific!
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
I also agree that I would give our 1st for him, and then use Cleveland's first to get the next great CB. In the 2nd, I would look for a COP (change of pace) speed back or the next great Guard/tackle.

EDIT: Now that I think about it, I'm starting to agree with Theogt on this. Why not give up Clevelands pick, especially if you're out of the McFadden sweepstakes? Try and convince JJ to take an average contract, resign Barber and Romo/Newman and Crayton if it's conceivable.

Don't go after Turner, as that's too much money for the backfield, we can pick a really good guy up in the 2nd/3rd round, even with our other 1st round pick.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I wouldn't have an issue with trading a first rounder for Larry. One thing is clear, he could be a #1 for many teams. If you draft a receiver high in the first round, you are going to pay big dollars for an unproven player. This way, you get a proven player. He is young too.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
Portland Fanatic;1681079 said:
Getting Fergy back and having Tank should cover the NT for a couple years...and we know Rat can play well there. I'd like to see Rat move to LDE and then we have trade options with Spears. I'd pick a big NT in rounds 4 or 5 if we have any concerns left.

yep. a whole lot of living to do between then and now. we simply don't know today what we'll need in 8 months. i love talking possibilities but i don't like focusing on 1 and only 1 possibility, but that's been covered plenty these days. : )
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
theogt;1681078 said:
I'd give them the Browns pick if they asked nicely. There's not a receiver in this draft that is in Fitzgerald's league.

Dude is only 24 years old.

No kidding. If you can sign him for the same money it would take to sign someone at that pick in the draft, it would be a straight trade for a proven player rather than rolling the dice on one. At 23ish, the guy has many years of football left.
 
Messages
4,316
Reaction score
1
The Cowboys would be stupid not to offer their number one pick for a YOUNG PROVEN WR, not some unknown high risk draft pick. Calvin Johnson isn't out there this year

And Desean Jackson is 165 pounds and is more quick/shifty than fast.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Unless the Cards have no choice, they wouldn't trade Larry for just a #1. They would want more.
 

Portland Fanatic

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,488
Reaction score
31
iceberg;1681098 said:
yep. a whole lot of living to do between then and now. we simply don't know today what we'll need in 8 months. i love talking possibilities but i don't like focusing on 1 and only 1 possibility, but that's been covered plenty these days. : )

Agreed...it comes down the last half of the year and how well Tank plays...or not.

To be honest he may prove to be a better DE...we'll find out. If he does pan out what a steal we are getting.
 
Top