NFC-- 9th Different Team in 10 Years Goes To SB
- Thread starter DipChit
- Start date
ROMOSAPIEN9
Proud Grandpa
- Messages
- 2,251
- Reaction score
- 1
That's the true meaning of life.
- Messages
- 33,772
- Reaction score
- 31,539
DipChit;1313276 said:Hey.. I just give the Hags credit for barely making it over .500 this year.
The previous 5 SB reps from the NFC couldnt even manage that "simple" feat.
Hags deserve credit indeed. They were decimated by injury this year and hung tough.
Dallas on the other hand was virtually injury free and with a future Hall of Fame coach we..........well.............we..............laid a big smelly fart is what we did.
lewpac
Benched
- Messages
- 1,465
- Reaction score
- 2
I stand by my previous assesment..........it's a sad day for NFL Football the Saints play in an NFC Championship game, and we were a whisker away froma Seattle vs. New Orleans Champ. game.
Put yourself in 1993. If anyone would have said then that it would come to this, you would've dismissed them as a crazy loon. Whoever heard of such a thing being possible?
Hope the NFL is happy with this product. It's takes everything in me to watch. The only reason I watch now is to see someone lose. And that's a sad, sad state of affairs.
Put yourself in 1993. If anyone would have said then that it would come to this, you would've dismissed them as a crazy loon. Whoever heard of such a thing being possible?
Hope the NFL is happy with this product. It's takes everything in me to watch. The only reason I watch now is to see someone lose. And that's a sad, sad state of affairs.
DipChit
New Member
- Messages
- 1,594
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah lets face it.. it's just a crapshoot anymore.
I'm so confused.
I dont know whether to give Reid credit for being competitive year after year or pop him for only getting there once while Payton might get there his 1st year.
I dont know whether to give Gruden credit for winning it all in year 1 or pop him for being 10 games under .500 since.
Should I can people every couple years cause it's proven now that guys can get there in their 1st or 2nd year or should I give someone 7 or 8 years to get there.. like Holmgren.
Or is the old fashioned way still the best approach.. 4 years.. fair for both sides?
Get me an aspirin.
I'm so confused.
I dont know whether to give Reid credit for being competitive year after year or pop him for only getting there once while Payton might get there his 1st year.
I dont know whether to give Gruden credit for winning it all in year 1 or pop him for being 10 games under .500 since.
Should I can people every couple years cause it's proven now that guys can get there in their 1st or 2nd year or should I give someone 7 or 8 years to get there.. like Holmgren.
Or is the old fashioned way still the best approach.. 4 years.. fair for both sides?
Get me an aspirin.
