NFL network, overtime new rule passed for playoffs

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
752
the opposing team can go into a tie as i understand, but they have to kick a fg in their first possession, i dont know what would happen if the opposing team scored a td,

28 teams approved it as i understand it, again breaking news, so i may not have all details right
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Per Chris Mortensen.

The overtime rules proposal has passed by a vote of 28-4.

The proposal was passed as written just for the postseason, but the owners have decided to discuss adopting the changes for the regular season at their next meeting, in May in Dallas.

The new rule says a team losing the coin toss and then surrendering a field goal on the first possession should have a series of its own in OT.

It needed 24 votes for ratification.

The Competition Committee recommended the change in a vote of 6-2, and commissioner Roger Goodell supported the plan and was able to secure enough votes to get the move passed on Tuesday, a day before the expected Wednesday vote.

"We've had this discussion for a number of years," Competition co-chairman Rich McKay told ESPN.com's John Clayton. "We feel this year's proposal gave us the opportunity to a pretty good rule. Statistically we felt it needed to be changed. It wasn't creating the fairest result as far as field goal accuracy, field goal distance and drive starts."

The reason for the change was the increased accuracy of kickers since 1993. In 1994, the NFL moved kickoffs from the 35 to the 30, which created better field position for the teams that won the coin toss and received the kickoffs. Since 1994, kickers have had better than a 50 percent accuracy level on field goals longer than 50 yards.

Statistics examined by the committee showed that since 1994, teams winning the coin toss win the game 59.8 percent of the time. The team that loses the toss wins the game 38.5 percent in that 15-year span, or since kickoffs were moved back 5 yards to the 30.
 

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
752
The NFL has announced that the owners have approved the modified overtime proposal for the postseason in 2010.

The vote passed at a 28-4 margin for the postseason only, but the issue will be revisited in May with the possibility of including regular season games. Per the new rule, the team that wins the coin toss must score a touchdown to win the game, ensuring that both teams will get the ball in the majority of overtime contests. If the game is tied after both teams' possessions, it then moves to a sudden death format.
 

AMERICAS_FAN

Active Member
Messages
7,198
Reaction score
0
They could have made it even easier and said an OT quarter lasts 7.5 minutes (half the normal length of a quarter), and teams play those full minutes nad the one with the msot points then wins.
 

miamicowboy21

Active Member
Messages
2,836
Reaction score
24
Why in sports do we have to change everything. We've been playing by the same rules for over 50 years. Why change? You have 60 minutes to win in regulation. If you can't win, too bad. If Favre dosent throw that stupid INT before overtime, maybe their isn't an overtime to be played. I don't like this at all.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,983
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
dbair1967;3317423 said:
Per Chris Mortensen.

The overtime rules proposal has passed by a vote of 28-4.

The proposal was passed as written just for the postseason, but the owners have decided to discuss adopting the changes for the regular season at their next meeting, in May in Dallas.
That's the final hurdle. Good luck. Now, back to WhineFest 2010.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,637
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Overtime proposal passes
Posted by Michael David Smith on March 23, 2010 3:22 PM ET

The National Football League owners have approved a change in overtime, starting with the playoffs following the 2010 season, that will modify the sudden-death format and prevent a team from winning a game with a field goal on the opening possession.

The vote was 28-4, with the Buffalo Bills, Minnesota Vikings, Baltimore Ravens and Cincinnati Bengals voting against. It needed at least 24 votes to pass.

"It was really a good discussion in the sense that there's been a lot of debate, both publicly and privately, over the rule -- which is always good," Competition Committee co-chair Rich McKay said in announcing the vote. "We've had this discussion for a number of years. We felt like this proposal, which we call 'modified sudden death,' was really an opportunity to make what we think was a pretty good rule -- sudden death -- even better."

McKay stressed that the new overtime rule, which says the team receiving the kickoff can't end the game on the first possession unless it scores a touchdown, will apply only to the playoffs.

"Part of the reason we have different rules is we have different consequences," McKay said. "The consequences in the postseason are, go home if you don't win. In the regular season, we have 15 other games."

It's the first major change in playoff overtime rules in the NFL since "The Greatest Game Ever Played," when the Baltimore Colts beat the New York Giants in the 1958 NFL Championship Game.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
It's probably good.

I just think simpler is better. First to score a TD I would have supported fully. This is just complicated and convoluted, and there's no way Donovan mcNabb will understand it.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
superpunk;3317470 said:
It's probably good.

I just think simpler is better. First to score a TD I would have supported fully. This is just complicated and convoluted, and there's no way Donovan mcNabb will understand it.

I agree that it should have been first TD wins, but that would never have passed. This was probably the best compromise.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
ThreeSportStar80;3317483 said:
We football historians frown at change to what has worked for 50 years....

Being able to win a game from half the field away, to me, is not "working".
 

DominantD

Active Member
Messages
135
Reaction score
80
So if the defense secures a safety on the first possession, the game must be over as well. We better get that language clarified quickly.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
ThreeSportStar80;3317483 said:
We football historians frown at change to what has worked for 50 years....
lol where did you get your degree?
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,983
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
superpunk;3317470 said:
It's probably good.

I just think simpler is better. First to score a TD I would have supported fully. This is just complicated and convoluted, and there's no way Donovan mcNabb will understand it.
http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/DonovansGift.png
AMERICAS_FAN;3317482 said:
They could just make overtime a sudden death match between the kickers.
That would make it too "soccerish".

I'll put $50 on Buehler! :eek:hboy:
 

Manster68

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
1,710
ThreeSportStar80;3317483 said:
We football historians frown at change to what has worked for 50 years....

AMEN!

Apparently, defense and special teams just is not part of football anymore.
 
Top