Where in "The proposal included a modified seeding system based solely on winning percentage." does it say that AFTER divisional winners, it's based on winning percentage. NO It doesn't. First off what you're calling winning percentage is win/loss record. Winning percentage is as of right now in the NFC the highest winning percentage is 3 teams, Seattle, saints and packers at 75%, bucs at 66.7%, cards and rams at 62.5%, bears 55.6%, 49ers at 44.4%. Right now those are the 8 teams with the best winning PERCENTAGE. The reason they would go to this system is because not all of the scheduled games were played so not all teams would have the possibility of the same win/loss record. Now I'm sure they have tie breaking rules just like the current system that probably goes head to head, then divisional percentage, conference percentage and finally interconference percentage and if need be coin toss. You're confusing a system that was kicked around one time where all teams that qualify for the playoffs would be seeded based on their win/loss record and not automatically the 4 divisional winners were the top 4 seeds, but that's not what this proposal is.
.
.