mattjames2010
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,712
- Reaction score
- 20,502
LOL fail.
Amazing at what threads have to be started for Dakota affirmation just because we signed little old Andy Dalton.
One reeking of desperation more than the previous one......this has to be be on of the best off-seasons in a long time!
Thanks for keeping things funny here
Winston and Prescott threw for more yards than Maholmes last year.it doesn’t require a rebuttal. You put up the most asinine chart in the history of asinine charts. Anything that has Winston and Dak ahead of Mahomes isn't worth looking at. All it shows is how low you’ll go to prove your point (a point that only Dak can prove mind you).
Winston and Prescott threw for more yards than Maholmes last year.
What criteria would you use?I'm in Dak's corner, but come on.
Talk about a massively broad definition of garbage time.
DOWN 21 POINTS OR MORE?
Holy .....
Oh Jesus Christ this thread isn't for you. It went completely over your head man.It doesn’t require a rebuttal. You put up the most asinine chart in the history of asinine charts. Anything that has Winston and Dak ahead of Mahomes isn't worth looking at. All it shows is how low you’ll go to prove your point (a point that only Dak can prove mind you).
Chiefs offense blew teams outWinston and Prescott threw for more yards than Maholmes last year.
He most definitely is.Winston is now backup?
Well they broke down percentage too. Chiefs were either in games or never down big. Says 0% of his yards came from garbage time.Chiefs offense blew teams out
This doesn’t include yards from point of being up by 21 I believe
Garbage time needs to be when you are leading by 21 also then. Or when you are leading by 17 or whatever number and their is 6 minutes or whatever left in the 4th Qt.So down 14 you believe should've been the criteria? Even though stats say the game isn't out of reach down 14?
So Dak gets all his years in garbage timeIt doesn’t require a rebuttal. You put up the most asinine chart in the history of asinine charts. Anything that has Winston and Dak ahead of Mahomes isn't worth looking at. All it shows is how low you’ll go to prove your point (a point that only Dak can prove mind you).
Good ol' @Super_Kazuya .......always the first troll to scream "troll" when you are one of the 4 posters on this site who troll harder than anyone.Disregarding the brainless troll attempt by the troll OP, I would say it's probably better to use win probability more than score. Garbage time is hard to measure... it's more about what the defense is doing than the offense. If the defense doesn't care if you are moving the ball as long as the clock is moving, it's garbage time. If the only way you can win is to get the ball back via an onside kick, which apparently plummeted to less than 5% last year, then it's garbage time.
I guess this is the response I'd expect from someone who can't really argue against this.
Don't you guys hate when people try to boost up how well a quarterback played especially when they have all those "garbage time" yards in them? Let's see what it looks like if you take out all of those garbage time yards out of it.
And yet I never create posts, I just respond to them, and here you are creating a post with an unsourced image created in Microsoft Paint with the only intent to rile people up. Literally textbook troll behavior.Good ol' @Super_Kazuya .......always the first troll to scream "troll" when you are one of the 4 posters on this site who troll harder than anyone.
Garbage time needs to be when you are leading by 21 also then. Or when you are leading by 17 or whatever number and their is 6 minutes or whatever left in the 4th Qt.
I guess Mahommes didnt have a single yard during garbage time.
yet I remember the Chiefs beating the Bengals 45-10. Mahommes was still completing passes when they were ahead.
You don't have to create posts to be a troll. Troll gonna troll though. I'm not gonna let you hijack the thread though man how was your Mother's Day yesterday?And yet I never create posts, I just respond to them, and here you are creating a post with an unsourced image created in Microsoft Paint with the only intent to rile people up. Literally textbook troll behavior.
So down 14 you believe should've been the criteria? Even though stats say the game isn't out of reach down 14?
Lol pretty moronic response by you.It doesn’t require a rebuttal. You put up the most asinine chart in the history of asinine charts. Anything that has Winston and Dak ahead of Mahomes isn't worth looking at. All it shows is how low you’ll go to prove your point (a point that only Dak can prove mind you).