NFL says no to Arm in Arm decal on Cowboys helmet

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,132
Reaction score
15,995
This is no surprise. If Goodell can not profit off of it, it's not allowed. As evidenced by all the players who have tried this same thing.

But don't worry, he will sell all the useless pink merchandise every year to make even more money!
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It's unfortunate, but you can see where the league does have to draw a line on these types of things. As Jerry said, there are a bunch of worthy causes and as a league they do have to be careful about precedents.

Not to mention that it's a very worthy cause but it's also at the center of a fairly incendiary topic that you can be sure the NFL doesn't want to find itself in the middle of if it flares up in-season, and it easily could.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,442
Reaction score
37,105
If the Cowboys were to make a statement like that they could offend some and even hurt thier feelings. This would be a poor reflection on the NFL.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It's the NFL...and it's the best way for the league to straddle the line on all kinds of issues, not just hot button issues.
 

Boyzmamacita

CowBabe Up!!!
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
64,100
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Idgit makes a good point, but it just doesn't seem right that the league said no to honoring fallen officers. They can say no to frivolous requests in the future, but this one seems like a power trip by the league office.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,686
Reaction score
44,617
I don't think its about offending anyone, just opens the floodgates for teams to put stickers for any and all causes

I sincerely agree with that take, but it's strange the league turns around and makes/allows its teams to wear pink in honor breast cancer awareness.

There just doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason.
 

TheFinisher

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,479
Reaction score
4,920
But they'll pay Beyonce to do a Super Bowl halftime show where she and her dancers are dressed as black panthers and promoted support for the Black Lives Matter movement.

CaqO2aVWEAAgsjB.jpg
 

Angus12

Well-Known Member
Messages
678
Reaction score
915
I don't see the problem. If they allowed the Cowboys to wear this sticker, while the other teams were not, they set precedence. Where do they draw the line. Pretty hard to then say no to anything else a team might want to add to the uniform. Once the NFL allows this, it won't be long before uniforms start looking like NASCAR.

There are plenty of reasons to ***** at Goodell and the NFL. This isn't one of them.
 

John813

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,735
Reaction score
36,775
I sincerely agree with that take, but it's strange the league turns around and makes/allows its teams to wear pink in honor breast cancer awareness.

There just doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason.

$$$

According to data obtained from the NFL by Darren Rovell of ESPN, the NFL “takes a 25% royalty from the wholesale price (1/2 retail), [and] donates 90% of royalty to American Cancer Society.”

In other words, for every $100 in pink merchandise sold, $12.50 goes to the NFL. Of that, $11.25 goes to the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the NFL keeps the rest. The remaining money is then divided up by the company that makes the merchandise (37.5%) and the company that sells the merchandise (50.0%), which is often the NFL and the individual teams.

Then consider that only 71.2% of money the ACS receives goes towards research and cancer programs. After everyone has taken their cut, only 8.01% of money spent on pink NFL merchandise is actually going towards cancer research (emphasis mine).

http://www.si.com/thecauldron/2015/10/26/nfl-breast-cancer-month-deangelo-williams
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top