dbair1967 said:
its not attacks...everything I've said about him was true SB...
So, you stand by the "trouble making thug" bit??
If so, I challenge you to back that argument up... show me one thing in his history that suggests a thuggish mindset on his part??
Absent that, nope, everything you said is NOT true... and a lot of what you said merely displays a superificial knowledge of the facts... for example-- Brooks' people claim that his positive test for weed was the result of ingesting second hand smoke at a party (and the report was that the level of THC in his system was rather low)... obviously, that might just be BS from his people, but I'll bet you didn't even know they were making such a claim, did you??
Having attended a few parties down in Charlottesville in a younger day, I can personally testify that weed is present at all of them, so their arguments don't sound out of the realm of possibility to me...
Before we continue to argue this, and before you take any of my arguments personally, I'd like to stress that while I have a problem with your take on this, you are a poster I hold in great respect... I don't want to come out of this with you feeling animosity toward me...
he was fat and incredibly out of shape, reports are he was over 280 lbs and only recently "got down" to below 270...
Yes, he was indeed fat... he was also injured, so he couldn't work out, couldn't work on keeping his weight down...
And like I said, he played at 265, ran in the 4.5s at that weight, so he can obviously carry it... so 273 pounds is NOT so out of shape that he can't back to peak condition... that issue is simply not a problem here...
he did get tossed out of school, not warned or suspended, TOSSED...I dont care that you think UVA is different than other places, they wouldnt be tossing a guy supposedly worth a top-10 draft pick at one point for simply smoking some weed on a couple occassions...
Which simply shows that you have no conception of the atmosphere at UVa, which alumni arrogantly refer to as "Mr. Jefferson's University"... they are a starchy, hide-bound bunch, and yeah, they have been known to boot athletes for offenses that other schools would never bat an eye at...
Think, pal, how many schools kick a guy out without ever having suspended him first??
The point I've been trying to make is that Al Groh has a very different kind of pressure put on him by the alumni, the boosters of that program... this move was probably forced on him... the evidence of that is the way he and the program are still trying to support him as he prepares for his NFL audition...
you say I didnt do my homework on the guy, are you privvy to info nobody else knows about him? How do you know his issue is ONLY hitting the bong a couple of times?
Don't go down that innuendo road, David... you're clearly assumed that there's something else there, and I'm telling you that I remember players being tossed for less...
And I have a strong distaste for trashing anybody based strictly on innuendo... if you've got something to back up your beliefs, bring them on... but you don't have anything, do you??
I do agree that IF we took him Parcells has gotten a recommendation from groh, but I think if that fantasy land scenario was going to happen Groh would have never tossed him off the team in the first place
I'm bettin' my last dime that Groh is gonna give Brooks a positive report to the scouts who attend... he wouldn't bother showing up there if he was gonna do anything to hurt Ahmad's chances, he'd simply let people who inquire know discreetly that he has little use for him... that fact alone should tell you that Groh really didn't want to boot Brooks, but he was given little choice in the matter...
No, I don't know that last assertion for a fact, but unlike your speculation that there's something else there, that we don't know about, my speculation is based on common sense (UVa wouldn't let him work out on-campus if he was persona non grata with them, and Groh wouldn't show up to the workout to support him)...
I'm sorry, man, but you have prejudged the guy while ignoring very real indicators out there that your judgement is flawed... perhaps that's because you didn't know about them, but I'd suggest before you pass a judgement like "trouble making thug", you really ought to make yourself aware of the facts...
Last summer, I was one of the most vocal critics of Maurice Clarett, I called him a punk... but when I made that statement, I had researched his history pretty thoroughly... I could discourse at length about his assorted transgressions... before you go rippin' on Brooks, you really ought to do your homework too... if you did, I have a hunch you wouldn't be so hard on the guy...
If you say you don't want a guy with a drug history on the team because you'll constantly be waiting for him to flunk another drug test, I can understand that... if you say you don't want the Cowboys taking a flyer on him because you worry that he won't do what's necessary to stay in playing shape, I can even understand that a little (though I personally think the only reason he got out of shape was his injuries)...
But I'm sorry, the hateful rhetoric you've aimed his way is just over the top, and I see no validity at all in the arguments you've forwarded against him...