They cut a guy with 15 career receptions in 18 games. They are keeping a guy with 5 career receptions and 9 career receptions. We are pretty weak at WR beyond the top 3.
Im not saying Sanu is some world beater. But I dont see him being cost prohibitive after being cut. You could probably get him on a vet min. On a team that will probably play 3 WR sets more than 80% of the time, adding a guy that has started in a SB for depth is good insurance. Wilson might wind up a decent WR, but I would he more willing to go the unproven route if we are expecting 6 to 8 wins out of this team. With a team hoping to contend for a title, Id rather have better insurance at such a key spot. Sanu would ne better insurance.
Either way I would be looking at the cuts for an upgrade over Wilson and Brown