I have no clue why we as fans are OK with NFL players using PEDs and are not Ok with MLB players using them. We all know that NFL players are clearly on them humans are not meant to be this big and fast. Head injuries will continue to get worse in the NFL, along with tendon and muscle injuries. And the head injuries in the future will DESTROY the NFL. Lawsuits from the players will take down the NFL in the future because clearly the NFL turns a blind eye to the players taking PEDs. They catch the players that are dumb enough to screw up there PED schedule. NFL knows it and Fans know it. I do not think PEDS make a better product. If everyone was on the same playing field and NOBODY was on them the product on the field would be better than it is now. You would have players that actually use proper form to play this game we all love.
This conversation in my opinion is fascinating.
I haven't paid attention to the general sentiment to know if people approve of one but not the other, but I will take a stab at it.
Baseball is less predicated upon size, strength, and speed. You can play in the MLB without this trifecta and you could get away with just having one of them in the MLB.
Just the opposite in the NFL. You'd have a hard time in the NFL if you don't posses a respectable amount of each relative to the position you play. Just without the prerequisite size you almost assuredly won't play in the NFL, and possessing size alone will give you a chance.
In that sense, I think some people (I don't buy into the idea) want baseball to be clean because it's a better reflection of natural ability regardless of size.
Also, in the NFL it's hard to draw a direct line from a single guy who's juicing to points on the board. Even if a guy could become JJ Watt by juicing, JJ is only getting to the endzone playing his primary position a couple times per year. In baseball it's damn easy to see a guy who hit a home run that barely clears the fence - and would have been an out without PEDs - putting runs on the board.
Lastly, and probably most important, the all-time records are actually reachable in baseball if players juice. Nobody is juicing their way past Jerry Rice's reception record, Emmitt's rushing record, or Peyton's TD record.
By my (not that big of a baseball guy, used to be) count, 4 of the top 10 HR hitters of all time are juicers. Bonds, A-Rod, Sosa, McGuire. Throw in Rafeal Palmeiro and Manny Ramirez, and 6 of the top 14 HR hitters have juiced.
Longevity is not rare in baseball, but it is in football. You see a guy like Bret Boone hit 125 HRs in his first 9 seasons suddenly turn it on at the age of 32 and hit 120 HRs in his next 4 seasons, and it becomes blatantly obvious that records will mean nothing if PEDs exist to any extent in baseball. A 14-15 HR/year guy becomes a 30 HR/year guy.
With PEDs, Cabrera is probably within 250 HRs of Bonds, and at the age of 32 he could have as many as 7-8 years to get there. Of course, 10 years from now some other guy like Trout who entered the game just young and who can hit will be in the exact same position.
Just my opinion. I don't think either should be tolerated. The whole beauty of sports, IMO, is that people are doing things that the rest of us can't. If they have to use PEDs to get there, kinda ruins it for me.