It has nothing to do with being biased against Big Ben. He engaged in a public display of sexual stupidity. You think the fact that he may have been drunk makes it better for the league. I disagree. He was suspended because his actions reflected poorly on the league, whether the suspension was excessive or not that's what it boils down to. He made the NFL look bad by behaving badly in public.
Zeke didn't do any of that. In fact, Zeke doesn't appear to have done anything at all.
I'm not sure how you are drawing a parallel between the two incidents, and why you are acting as if it's feasible that Zeke gets suspended because Big Ben did. If you want to champion the guys who bang drunken sluts in public bathrooms, have at it. But a lot of companies would probably not want that kind of publicity.
"He displayed in a display of sexual stupidity" - Once again, the issue did not come from the sex in the bathroom. She admitted to it being mutual, she said she was sexually assaulted in the morning (after having sex with him AGAIN) and that's where the controversy came from
I don't care about what you "disagree" with. Your original post stated he got her drunk, you have no proof that HE got her drunk. It was from the girls testimony, he said/she said. You inserted your own bias into this and I called you out.
The NFL doesn't give a damn about what player is having sex in some clubs damn bathroom. Half the damn league would be on suspension if this was the case. It came from the controversy.
What is the parallel here? Someone question if the NFL would suspend someone on pure speculation. Big Ben wasn't charged with anything, everything in the girl's testimony was not supported by a dang thing. So, he was charged on nothing but speculation. A girl going to the police is exactly what got Big Ben suspended. It was NOT for "Having sex in a bathroom". You started out by saying he got her drunk just to sleep with her, now you're bringing it all the way down to "Well, it was for sex in public"
I mean, at least stay consistent.