No pay, no spray: Firefighters let home burn

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
VietCowboy;3601941 said:
I definitely agree with this if possible. Not sure what you mean by contract.

Given the guy did not pay, not sure how he could sign a contract ahead of time saying he'll pay etc etc.

Unless you mean a contract with the fire department's insurance company that would pay for injuries and damages to the firefighter. This would probably increase their premium, which they'd probably pass onto the residents.

p.s. Our local news tonight featured a nearby county firefighter who say that their services rely a lot on donations for upkeeping. So, I'm guessing that taxes isn't enough either. I can definitely see the repercussion of that fire department if they chose to help out because if they are already struggling financially, imagine what would happen if no one paid unless they had a fire. Definitely not.
I would not charge a yearly fee without a contract that was therefore enforceable in a court of law.

In other words, you own your home, I am the FD affected by this. There has to be a paper trail to justify this charge. Then if you "forget" to pay there are clauses determining action taken and the FD can never be sued for liability.

It would be signed by all parties and binding.

Whether people want to acknowledge it or not there are boundaries set upon municipalities. They have to be respected and when there is an agreement of cooperation, such as this FD and people outside there municipality, then there has to be some form of enforceable agreement.
 

JohnnyHopkins

This is a house of learned doctors
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
3,610
Wow, I bet the other overdue accounts were paid immediately.

I don't know how they could ethically let the house burn. I couldn't stand by and watch that. I would add that I have a real problem with folks that don't pay their bills.
 

urface59

Active Member
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
0
This is bull. We give the government so much of our money already and this guys house and pets burn for 75 bucks. I don't care if it's the FD's policy or law or whatever, sometimes you just have to do the right thing despite the rules. If this was happening in my neighborhood i'd go highjack a fire truck and pathetically fail to put out the fire, but you can't just stand by and let some ones home burn down.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
I heard this guy was 75 years old. It is possible that someone that age did forget to pay a bill. Still sounds like a fishy story.
 

Concord

Mr. Buckeye
Messages
12,826
Reaction score
120
You let a guys house burn down and ESPECIALLY let his pets die...

In my book you're a piece of ****.

Karma
 

MonsterD

Quota outta absentia
Messages
8,143
Reaction score
5,876
Well here is the thing, maybe Hostile can account for this. Wouldn't the home be a near loss even if they did put out the fire? I mean this was not just a small fire next to the house the house was on fire. Water damage just takes care of the rest. I don't see it as "saving" the home. If it was just a small fire"relatively I mean" and was not widespread or just starting to consume the home, then THAT would be beyond asinine that the fire dept does nothing but watch it without attempting to put it out. Now that really is unethical, but saving the guy maybe a couple of thousand in maybe just whatever could be salvaged,, not really sure.
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
urface59;3602810 said:
This is bull. We give the government so much of our money already and this guys house and pets burn for 75 bucks. I don't care if it's the FD's policy or law or whatever, sometimes you just have to do the right thing despite the rules. If this was happening in my neighborhood i'd go highjack a fire truck and pathetically fail to put out the fire, but you can't just stand by and let some ones home burn down.

That's easy to say when it's not your job on the line. Take my word for it, every firefighter in the country right now is susceptible to losing their job, and there are over 500,000 certified firefighter/emt/paramedics dying to take it from them.

This is political, not personal. If those guys don't follow orders and protocol, they're putting their own livelihood in danger, not to mention their lives. I doubt very much there wasn't a firefighter on scene there that wouldn't have loved to be able to kick that fire's ***. It's what they live for, but their hands were tied.

...would you sacrifice your family's income and livelihood to keep another man's home from burning when you were specifically ordered not to?

You'd be a fool if you did.
 

urface59

Active Member
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
0
tomson75;3602833 said:
That's easy to say when it's not your job on the line. Take my word for it, every firefighter in the country right now is susceptible to losing their job, and there are over 500,000 certified firefighter/emt/paramedics dying to take it from them.

This is political, not personal. If those guys don't follow orders and protocol, they're putting their own livelihood in danger, not to mention their lives. I doubt very much there wasn't a firefighter on scene there that wouldn't have loved to be able to kick that fire's ***. It's what they live for, but their hands were tied.

...would you sacrifice your family's income and livelihood to keep another man's home from burning when you were specifically ordered not to?

You'd be a fool if you did.


No, I'd be a fool if I let a corrupt government keep me from doing what I know is right.
 

Concord

Mr. Buckeye
Messages
12,826
Reaction score
120
urface59;3602844 said:
No, I'd be a fool if I let a corrupt government keep me from doing what I know is right.

No crap.

That's ********.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
tomson75;3602833 said:
That's easy to say when it's not your job on the line. Take my word for it, every firefighter in the country right now is susceptible to losing their job, and there are over 500,000 certified firefighter/emt/paramedics dying to take it from them.

This is political, not personal. If those guys don't follow orders and protocol, they're putting their own livelihood in danger, not to mention their lives. I doubt very much there wasn't a firefighter on scene there that wouldn't have loved to be able to kick that fire's ***. It's what they live for, but their hands were tied.

...would you sacrifice your family's income and livelihood to keep another man's home from burning when you were specifically ordered not to?

You'd be a fool if you did.
Tomson is exactly right. It doesn't matter if anyone likes it or not.

Look, a Fire Department is not an autonomous entity. They answer to someone. Let me give you a scenario that is likely very close to the one described above.

The city where the FD exists have responsibility for the firefighters, equipment, and citizens of their municipality. I hope no one disagrees with this. Undoubtedly they insure the FD and their equipment. Every time that equipment or active firefighters leave their jurisdiction their liability increases exponentially.

How does the city where the department exists know the condition of fire hydrants outside of their control? They don't. If a subdivision has a hydrant that is sub standard the firefighters could potentially be in more danger. All it takes is one rusty gate valve inside a hydrant and you have men inside an inferno expecting water and when the tank on the truck runs out, they are in danger.

If you guys do not think City Hall doesn't put pressure on these departments to have contingency plans then you are delusional. Not only that, but if they go outside the established contingenc,y they are now in jeopardy of being seen by City Hall as insubordinate.

I took an oath when I was a firefighter. We all do. If you think they didn't want to respond to that fire you're out of your mind. The adrenaline rush alone is addictive and these guys take pride.

But the chances are they were warned of the consequences if they disobeyed orders. It is easy to say you would disobey City Hall and face the music, because you don't breathe the air these guys do. When you wear that uniform you represent something, but you also are subject to the name of the municipality on your sleeve and the door of the truck.

I rarely talk about this. My partner and I were first on scene of a toxic spill from a tanker truck. My job when I saw the placard was to look up the Hazmat procedures immediately. My instructions when I saw the protocol were to keep everyone back 75 yards from the spill. My partner and I were ordered not to go any closer. I could hear the driver screaming for help. I had to listen to him die. It tore me up inside. I can't even begin to explain it to you. Sometimes I hear him in my dreams. I wish I was making that up, but I am not. I have been told he was going to die whether I got him out of the truck or not. Had we gone closer we too would have died. It was guaranteed. So we sat there hearing him plead and then his breath gurgle as his lungs exploded inside him little by little.

Our fire truck was confiscated by the EPA until they could determine it was contaminant free. They brought in a bulldozer and dug a trench in the ground. My partner and I were instructed to walk into that trench. Their agents in silver suits turned the reel fire hoses from a truck on us and they stripped us naked as they scrubbed us with brushes. There we were naked in front of God and everyone. Wool blankets don't feel comfortable on scrubbed until pink skin.

If you think I tell you that story to brag, you're out of your mind. I wish it never happened, but it did.

I took a course in air crash rescue. Did you know that if a military jet goes down and the pilot is still in the cockpit you can't approach the plane? You do the wrong thing and the ejector seat will kill you. I never had to face that, but just like that truck driver if I had I might have had to listen to a man die. I might even see it this time.

There is nothing simple about being a firefighter and nothing simple about following some orders. You can talk all you want about how unfair this is. I will tell you the most unfair thing about it. Putting that department in the position to ever make that call. That is the part that is unfair.

Like I said earlier in this thread. If I am Administration of that department I have something in place in case someone "forgets" to pay. Something that pays a lot more than the 75 bucks. It would not be negotiable because to respond means I put men and equipment on the line.

This is tough. I feel for the family that lost everything. I really do, but my sympathies lie with the Department. They acted right. I will defend them until my last breath. I have been there. It doesn't make it easy, but that job is never easy.

They did the right thing. Emotions don't count in the real world. That is the hard but honest truth.
 

TwoCentPlain

Numbnuts
Messages
15,283
Reaction score
11,162
VietCowboy;3601822 said:
The point of it was that the fire department does have a responsibility to those who pay for their services. This guy did not pay for it, and only expected to pay for it when he needed it. Sorry, but if everyone in his county did that, that would mean more of a burden on the main county's taxpayers.

How about healthcare? Should hospitals and doctors be able to turn down all those who can't (or won't) pay?

If fire departments want to act like this, hospitals should be able to also.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
So what if there had been a HUMAN in that house, Hoss? You still let it burn?
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
burmafrd;3603214 said:
So what if there had been a HUMAN in that house, Hoss? You still let it burn?

That's a VERY different situation.

As a firefighter, you're trained to take your own safety and the safety of your fellow firefighters into account above all else.....but the type of person that works to become a firefighter (there are most definitely exceptions), are typically not "idle" or passive in situations like that.

You weigh the possibility of death or injury to yourself first before making those decisions, and I'd be surprised if most firefighters wouldn't make entry on the house if there was human life at stake, and there was reasonable opportunity for rescue. It's about weighing risks and possible results.

Personal safety, firefighter safety, occupant safety, the safety of those in other life threatening situations, animal or livestock safety, incident stabilization, and property conservation are weighed in that order.

Personally, I'd have a hard time putting my job and my family's income on the line for the last three safety issues. Call me a scumbag, or whatever, but I'm going home to my family with my income still intact....it's not my responsibility to protect another man's property if it endangers my own.

These firefighters did what they had to do. If you have a problem with it, it should be addressed by the county, city, or whatever other governing body that creates the policies for that fire department.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Did the firefighters actually respond to the fire in the first place or did they know he hadn't paid so they didn't even respond?
 

VietCowboy

Be Realistic. Demand the Impossible.
Messages
2,966
Reaction score
54
nyc;3603338 said:
Did the firefighters actually respond to the fire in the first place or did they know he hadn't paid so they didn't even respond?

They didn't respond to him. They responded to a neighbor who did pay and was worried the fire would spread to his house.
 

CowboyDan

Anger is a Gift
Messages
3,476
Reaction score
215
To me, the most dispicable part of this whole ridiculous thing is that neighbors, with open checkbooks, were begging the firefighters to put it out. There's seriously something wrong with this form of service if you send the FD out to the house, then have to check and see if someone is up to date on their payments before you spray a drop of water on their burning house and pets. It's not humane. It's wrong. It reminds me of the movie Gangs of New York, when the fire companies fight over who's going to put out the house, as the house burns to the ground. This is 2010, we should be way past this BS.
Glad I got in before the inevitable lock on this thread due to the political topic.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
IMO, If the owner ask them to put it out, they should have put it out and changed the home owner the full amount that it cost to put it out. Then put a lien against the property until the owner pays off the owned amount.

This way, the owners house is saved (if he wants it saved) and the service is paid for.
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
Hostile;3601952 said:
I would not charge a yearly fee without a contract that was therefore enforceable in a court of law.

In other words, you own your home, I am the FD affected by this. There has to be a paper trail to justify this charge. Then if you "forget" to pay there are clauses determining action taken and the FD can never be sued for liability.

It would be signed by all parties and binding.

Whether people want to acknowledge it or not there are boundaries set upon municipalities. They have to be respected and when there is an agreement of cooperation, such as this FD and people outside there municipality, then there has to be some form of enforceable agreement.

Choosing to live in the rural areas where the fee/law is well-known to a reasonable person would count as acceptance of a contract in most courts.

I doubt they would recover damages if they took up a cause of action. Their beef here is with their insurance company. Hope they have insurance.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
Some things not brought up in this thread:

1. This isn't the first time he "forgot" to pay this fee. At least one other time he had a fire and they let him pay the fee the next day.

2. The fire started as a brush fire and he had at least two hours to get the pets out of the house.

3. He's had, from what I remember from the radio, 4 fires in the last couple of years at this location.

I'm on the fence on the FD's response. I just wanted to bring up a few facts that haven't been discussed.
 
Top