Bach;2991251 said:I see, the old "injuries and other issues" argument. Guess what? All teams have injuries. That team fell apart in crunch time and there was ZERO reason to bring Wade back.
You act like Jerry changed once he hired Parcells, but the day Parcells left, Jerry went back to being large and in charge. In fact, he hired Garrett before he even hired a HC, much like he operated in the late 90's when he controlled the coaching staff and ruled his puppets.
Wade was brought in for one main reason, Jerry wanted to continue the 3-4 that Parcells installed and Wade was a 3-4 coach. Much like Gailey was mainly and OC with a HC title, Wade was brought here mainly to be a DC and given the HC title. Garrett, Houck, Campo were all Jerry hires.
This team is digressing and unless we get another strong HC in here with pull like Parcells had or better yet, like Jimmy had, then we will continue to digress. Jerry's "way" isn't working and never has worked. We've only had success when someone like Jimmy or Parcells were here. We had some residue success immediately after both left, but eventually it falls apart.
thewivil;2990037 said:Was this just heresay, or did he have some facts or legitimate sources to back it up?
I can't see any player that needs to be benched that Jerry feels so strongly about that he'd step in for.
Chocolate Lab;2991979 said:That's my question, too. Was Norm giving recent examples of this or something? Why was this just coming up tonight when Norm has a show every weekday of the year to talk about this stuff?
And for people who say seats will be empty, etc... Nope, the coaches will get the blame. Jerry will just hire Holmgren next year, there will be lots of ads about the Walrus being in town and how he won a Superbowl by taming Romo's idol Fav-ruh. Good times will be ahead and faith will be renewed. That'll buy a few more years of interest and $$$ for Jerry.
Chocolate Lab;2992026 said:Well, I hope not. You know what I think of Garrett. I don't think he even grasps basic concepts on offense yet.
It's funny, all game today I was thinking of making a thread: "I want Parcells back....
.... for offensive coordinator!"
Why? Because Parcells -- and many others of lesser fame -- understand how you have to manage the quarterback, especially when he's not at his best. When it was 10-0 and we were backed up late in the first half, I told my buddy, "Now let's just run the ball or throw short passes here. If we have to punt, that's fine. There's nothing wrong with punting! But the one thing we can't do is turn the ball over here." And sure enough, Romo is sacked and fumbles and they get the ball inside our 10 and score a TD. It's crazy when our D is playing well and we have one of the best punters in football -- at altitude, no less -- to always be so aggressive.
So if we fail this year, I think we HAVE to have a new voice other than Garrett. Maybe Shanahan would work, too, I don't know. But I don't see how it can be Garrett as long as Romo keeps turning the ball over. Because as some coach told Romo on his way out the door, "You can't turn the ball over, son. You just can't do it."
Chocolate Lab;2992026 said:Well, I hope not. You know what I think of Garrett. I don't think he even grasps basic concepts on offense yet.
It's funny, all game today I was thinking of making a thread: "I want Parcells back....
.... for offensive coordinator!"
Why? Because Parcells -- and many others of lesser fame -- understand how you have to manage the quarterback, especially when he's not at his best. When it was 10-0 and we were backed up late in the first half, I told my buddy, "Now let's just run the ball or throw short passes here. If we have to punt, that's fine. But we can't turn the ball over here." And sure, enough, Romo is sacked and they get the ball inside our 10 and score a TD. It's crazy when our D is playing well and we have one of the best punters in football, at altitude, no less!
So if we fail this year, I think we HAVE to have a new voice other than Garrett. Maybe Shanahan would work, too, I don't know. But I don't see how it can be Garrett as long as Romo keeps turning the ball over. Because as some coach told Romo on his way out the door, "You can't turn the ball over, son. You just can't do it."
Chocolate Lab;2992058 said:One more thing on this that I forgot above... I happened to hear Jerry on that pregame show, and to me he always sounds drunk like that -- maybe not literally drunk, but drunk on the excitement of the game. I don't even know why they do that Owners Show, because Jerry usually seems so distracted and even more rambling than he normally is.
I was flipping around and also caught the excellent Ticket pregame when Sturm talked to Todd Archer for about 10 minutes. Sturm was asking this very thing about whether Todd thought Garrett had any kind of governor on him, because it didn't seem like it to him. Todd said they rarely get to speak to Garrett except for after his workout before lunch in the hall, but Garrett just agrees with every question so there's nothing of value said anyway. But Archer agreed that Garrett seemed to have free reign, and that's why Wade wanted Dan Reeves to help him. Of course, Jerry manged to throw a monkey wrench in that deal.
UVAwahoos;2991579 said:WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT FOR EVERY FAN TO UNDERSTAND THIS UTTER AND COMPLETE TRUTH?
So many Jerry apologists in this fanbase. It's rather sickening. Jimmy and Parcells were football guys. Jerry had a hand in a lot of the great decisions, but half those ideas probably wouldn't have even been entertained had the right minds not been around. This franchise is headed south fast and it's a shame because a descent coach and a gone form of Jerry is all it would take.
SultanOfSix;2992981 said:With all of the current Garrett disgust, one would think TO was right.
Oh, did I just go there?
thewivil;2990037 said:Was this just heresay, or did he have some facts or legitimate sources to back it up?
I can't see any player that needs to be benched that Jerry feels so strongly about that he'd step in for.