Any expectation that Tolbert can handle the #2 role until Gallup back should be quashed at this point if history is any indicator.
It's almost criminal that Jerry and Stephen seem to think WR is just in great shape at this point. They are assuming Gallup will be back in a few weeks after the season starts AND he'll just pick up right where he left off.
They are gambling at the WR position. And if Lamb were to get hurt for a game or two early, wooo boy.
EDIT: Before the homers get wound up, I am not suggesting Tolbert isn't good or whatever. But he is what he is - a third round rookie WR. They don't typically hit right away and take time to develop. It's almost unfair to the kid to expect him to fill that #2 role effectively until Gallup is back and proves he's 100% healthy.
couple of different thoughts on this:
1. Tolbert will not be the #2 option in this Offense, Unless he is the only WR we can put on the field. CD, TE, RB, then you get into Tolbert and Simi should be able to help with that role as well, he is in his second year and then Brown as looked really good. What i am saying is, we don't need Tolbert to be the #2 target in this O with everyone else we have.
2. We can't/shouldn't go get more WR at this point, not with 2 that will be coming back and Brown and Simi and if we really do plan to be a run first team then CD, The TEs , Brown, Simi and Tolbert is more than good enough to get us a through a few games.
And if history was a reason not to do things: Dak should have never been on the field as long as Romo was healthy in 16, history tells us that Rookies don't win SB, Parcells, McCarthy should have never been hired, History tells us NFL coaches don't win SB with 2 different teams. There are a lot of things that have never been done before, until they are done first time.