I’m glad we agree this was a perversion of justice. I already knew this took place in the nfl’s system of justice, but thank you. And yes when Friel kept the lead investigator’s opinion and recomendation from the commissioner she was perverting justice.You don't get it, do you?
You use the silly term perversion of justice.
First off, justice is subjective. Justice, in legal terms, means due process, ya know, charges, hearings, trial, sentencing, and even appeals and possibly jail time or fines.
This "perversion" of justice, barrister, came IN THE NFL!
All teams comply with NFL rules and dictates not only from management but from labor.
Learn to separate the 2 systems of "justice" and you'll sleep better, silly C.
And further more, you know and I know that if the accuser could run for 150 yards per game, you'd be yammering for her "justice."
You don't get it. Neither does Jerry. The diff is he has a big financial stake in this case and you are just enamored of Zeke's midriff and yardage.
from someone who used to laugh and ridicule the tinfoil hat crew who is now firmly a believer in the anti-Cowboy conspiracy:
These teams are sole proprietorships (or, in come cases, partnerships), not corporations (Green Bay notwithstanding). So if revenues decrease modestly, an individual owner can easily weather the storm. They don't have to worry about panicked stockholders jumping ship to put their money in some dot-com they think is a better investment. No NFL owner is going to sell his team over a short term 3% decline in revenue - ESPECIALLY since a decline in revenue directly leads to a decline in operating expenses by virtue of the fact that the salary cap would come down.
Never agreed it was a perversion of justice as you see it in a monolithic universal system of "justice" however one defines justice.
Uh yeah ok, and you don’t understand what fundamental fairness means and or how it wasn’t part of this process.(sadder
)Otherwise you’d understand that I’m not saying this case should get the same rights afforded in judicial law. Just simply the rights the cba provided.
Uh yeah ok, and you don’t understand what fundamental fairness means and or how it wasn’t part of this process.(sadder
We can have a broader discussion of justice if you’d like. If so would you consider using your broken English style of writing or maybe the United Kingdom?? Style— or whatever you call it. I’d like you to entertain me please.
Uh yeah ok, and you don’t understand what fundamental fairness means and or how it wasn’t part of this process.(sadder
We can have a broader discussion of justice if you’d like. If so would you consider using your broken English style of writing or maybe the United Kingdom?? Style— or whatever you call it. I’d like you to entertain me please.
