Redball Express
All Aboard!!!
- Messages
- 16,253
- Reaction score
- 12,758
I do not want to point out the old Cowboy bias..I thought when that video of Beckham came out and our fans were calling for him to be suspended that it was just as stupid as this. The evidence was circumstantial at best. The primary difference I see is that I don't think there was any legitimate news source that accused him of smoking weed or doing coke even though there was more "evidence" of that than saying Elliott had been smoking weed just because he used the word "faded." There was just a lot of fan speculation while some news sources did say that it looked like cocaine and a blunt, but not actually that it was. SI wrote in its headline that Elliott "Admits to Being High." That is just wrong.
Elliott absolutely was within his rights and justified to tweet: “I expect that from little gossip site but Sports Illustrated? REALLY?” and "Actually I was referring to the few drinks I had which I said during the live stream. Doesn’t that make this defamation? You guys will [be] hearing from my lawyers @SInow.”
But..
what can you really expect?
While we have demonstrations in the streets over civil rights..
Zeke gets his rights attacked and he is supposed to shrug it off?
No no no.
It's the same with his dog subject.
Zeke has rights.
He needs to use whatever he can to defend himself.