Off-season. Dak for Rodgers or Wilson?

Adiba1977

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,817
Reaction score
4,569
If both those players say they want out would either of those teams be willing/dumb enough to take dak? Hypothetically asking for a friend.
 
Haha Dak in Green Bay. Green Bay is nothing without Rodgers. No way Adams stay to play with Dak. But Dak has a no trade clause (as everyone on here reminded me) so he won't be stuck in the frozen wasteland. Because Jerry had to give him a no-trade clause.
 
Yeah….no. We’d need to trade probably 40 first round picks to not only get rid of Dak and his contract, but to pick up Rodgers as well. We are (unfortunately) stuck with Dak. All we can do is hope he plays better which is looking unlikely since his slump has lasted well over a month.
 
Dak is our QB. He struggling as has every great QB. He’ll get it together soon.
well-waiting.gif
 
Yeah….no. We’d need to trade probably 40 first round picks to not only get rid of Dak and his contract, but to pick up Rodgers as well. We are (unfortunately) stuck with Dak. All we can do is hope he plays better which is looking unlikely since his slump has lasted well over a month.

Detroit would though, but only because they don't know any better.
 
Dak and 2 first round and 2 3rd for Wilson? I mean surely we have to give the other team more than what the Rams gave away with Goff.


At 33 with the Seagulls going to the bottom I’ll keep Dak
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR
So wait, Dak isn't good enough for the Cowboys, so the Packers or Seahawks would trade for him in a heartbeat?

Even suggesting this means you think Dak is good. Stop and think about it.
 
I had Rodgers going to the Broncos but now I think that is where Wilson ends up. Maybe Rodgers ends up with the Saints or Panthers. Either one would immediately be a contender.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,444
Messages
13,875,098
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top