You can trade Tony Romo for one player in the NFL, but it cannot be a quarterback. Who are you acquiring?
You can trade Tony Romo for one player in the NFL, but it cannot be a quarterback. Who are you acquiring?
The idea of trading Rome is not fun. Can't play this game with that objective. But I'll do this... If Jerry released his grip on the GM job, would you rather that job go to his son Stephen or Will McClay? What other changes would be made under either scenario?
First off I wouldn't trade Romo for a Non- QB.
If I had too...
Probably Von Miller followed by JJ Watt ( I can't stand Watt though. Seems like a real tool bag.)
Actually, the better long term play is to trade Romo now if you can get multiple first round picks. But that is a pipe dream. And Im sure plenty of poster are going to cry about that idea. It doenst fit their "win now" agenda.
Actually, the better long term play is to trade Romo now if you can get multiple first round picks. But that is a pipe dream. And Im sure plenty of poster are going to cry about that idea. It doenst fit their "win now" agenda.
Romo is far more valuable to Dallas than what they could get for a 36 year QB--franchise QB or not.
We would never get JJ Watt in a trade, in other words.
No, the idea of trading Romo gives me nausea. There's no way for me to have fun entertaining that idea.