I think Henson will continue to develope. Someone made a good post about it, I think it was Rack..
He's been here for 2 offsesasons now, most rookie QB's dont do well until their 2nd or 3rd season. Taking into consideration that he hasnt played that long, you can almost scrap that 1st year and count that as college. I almost view him as a rookie because of his long absence to the game. Just like Carson Palmer sat on the bench his rookie year, I think it will benefit Henson to get more accustomed to making reads and getting reps in practice.
If he is still struggling next offseason, we still have Romo and Bledsoe. I don't think Romo will be a starter for us. He has played well in the pre season, I'm just not sure that he has what it takes though. Henson sure hasn't shown it yet either, so I'm not one of those guys who will sit here and just bash Romo because I tink Henson can develope into our starter. Romo deserves to be #2 on the roster, he's shown that, at this point, he is the second best QB we have.
Bledsoe should be our starter the next 2 seasons...so if Henson or Romo don't show enough this season, or in the offseason next year, we will be able to draft a QB or get one by some other means in the offseason. I think we have to give both Romo and Henson another year. Although I think it is unfair to put Romo and Henson in the same boat right now. Henson has played 1 year less in this league, and less college footballl. Id say give him 1 more year at least. But after that, I have to agree, the excuses have to stop. We cant stop gap for 5 years until Henson might be ready. He needs to show something within the next year
![·[A]koN·](/data/avatars/m/3/3798.jpg?1371882954){kind=avatar}
Well Troy is just about the right age for Tuna but he seems to only like old QB's who have previously played for him.
