Ok-Romo or Roethlisberger?

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,312
Reaction score
32,716
Rampage;2039893 said:
in 05 big Ben was the biggest reason they got to the bowl. he was great in the 3 playoff games and yes i know he stunk it up in the bowl. but he's 4-1 in the postseason including the superbowl. he also didn't have the weapons Romo has.

:clap:
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I love Romo and think he will get his chance at having a SB ring but I think Dallas has to give him a consistent running game so that we are not having to deal with 2nd/3rd and long and expect Tony to make those plays every time. Roethlisberger in his championship run had a very good running attack to help keep defenses off balance
 

31smackdown

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
223
Every time I watch Ben I am amazed he doesn't get sacked more often.. he rolls and stands looking for an open receiver and holds the ball for a long time.. a lot of times his size and strength allow him to get away from the first arm on him, but 50% of the time I think he is going to get sacked.. It never really looks like he is hitting his progressions either, but that he is hitting the open guy once he buys time with the rollout.. in playground mode. Not that Romo doesn't do that too. Ben does have an arm though.. it's just his lack of quickness that I think may catch up to him.
 

bigE79

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,788
Reaction score
9,729
i tell you what,im also from pissburgh and my dad is the biggest stealer freak around but even he cant stand BEN and he couldnt believe they gave him the kind of money they did and would take ROMO anyday:star:
 

zeromaster

New Member
Messages
2,575
Reaction score
0
Hard to believe it's even a question.

Ben does not make the greatest of decisions with the ball. People get too caught up with his size and his early success.

I'll take Romo until he proves he just can't get it done in the postseason. Even then I wouldn't take Roethlisberger. I'd sooner draft a replacement.

jmo
 

Cowboysfan22

Member
Messages
616
Reaction score
0
Ben is not that great of qb compared to romo. This is because Romo had 4,211 yards and ben had 3,154 yards. Romo had 36 touchdowns Ben had 32. Romo had 215 first downs and Ben had 168. Romo is the best.:bow::starspin:starspin:starspin:starspin:starspin:starspin:starspin
 

Mr.davon24

PGH Cowboy Fan
Messages
261
Reaction score
0
I go through the same stuff I am from the Burgh Also..... IMO Ben was ok his first year or so. Comparing those two just isn't fair. LOL Ben is bum cheeks.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,982
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
This is one that will always be divided along party lines with very few exceptions.

Maybe of few Steeler fans would cross the line if Tony QBs a team that wins a playoff game and maybe eventually a Super Bowl. I'm with Romo, becasue, well, he IS better. But they have ammo too.

I consider Big Ben to be more like what David Garrard is developing into---a very good QB who is more of a game manager.
 

TwoCentPlain

Numbnuts
Messages
15,171
Reaction score
11,084
Where do you live in Pgh? I live in Lawrenceville. I didn't know there were other Cowboy fans here in Pgh. How did you become a cowboy fan? Me, I followed my favorite college player Tony Dorsett to Dallas.
 
Top